Rutherford HablabbleBibble
-
Posts
31 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Rutherford HablabbleBibble
-
Sorry everyone. Been really busy the past three days. Selling wands door-to-door, obviously. Less than surprised Helena turned up dead, but less than thrilled she was able to take down another townie with her. Our vig winding up geting killed isn't very reassuring either. I'm pretty annoyed Barkonius ended up being ton, but even with a scum, vig, and SK, two full-on protectors is pretty unlikely, bodyguard or not. Vote: Drubulum Panck, but Belinda's a close second for my top suspect, as it seems she had access to a good number of PRs right before most of them started dying...but in the event Drub comes up town, we need to take a close look at Firuz. A protector, a bodyguard, and a one shot is just plain ridiculous.
-
I'm not singling you out, I'm just responding to you. I just really think it'd be a lot more fun for everyone if nobody had an attitude like this, whether it's part of a strategy or not. But again, it's more of a suggestion than anything.
-
I can tell, you weren't like this the past three days. There are 1001 different strategies that don't require such a bad attitude, but whatever flutes your boat. You can have whatever opinion you like. I'm just asking you try and take everyone else's into account.
-
I can see. Do you think using the same attitude as her is going to help at all? Yeah, she's been a dick, but ever since you claimed, you haven't been any better. It's not in the rules that you have to be unconditionally nice to everyone, just don't think you're any better because she did it first. As far as everyone else is concerned, you both just have bad attitudes. I'm not going to argue who has the right to call out who on what, just know how much easier and less of a headache it'd be if you both tried to knock it off.
-
Unvote: Helena Hippopaw. Vote: Barkonius Twitch. Three protector claims is two too many, he lied about having a modifier in private, and the watcher seems to believe he's the scummiest of the three. I'm willing to see how this goes, and I guess if it means keeping PR identities hidden...you can delay your death a little while longer, Helena. But both of you need to remember there are other people here, and the ridiculous attitude coming from both of you makes you a frustrating experience to have to deal with, regardless of who did first. We're all here to have fun, there's no need to drag everyone down with this behavior.
-
Who's the serial killer here? I'm calling you a dick mostly because you're being a dick, not because you're blackmailing the town. I'm more annoyed at your attitude than anything. That's not bad playing, that just doesn't make any sense. If you didn't have a purpose anymore, you wouldn't be here. My money's on you're now a totally self-dependent serial killer, or you can convert a partner.
-
I would be a lot more inclined to believe you're helping to town, if you weren't a serial killer holding our PRs hostage in order to, as you repeatedly state, survive, so that you can freely do absolutely nothing with no chance of winning. You're no penis. You're just a dick.
-
Well, you're loosing.
-
A vote against you is a vote against you, Helena. Vote: Helena Hippopaw. The Overlord has spoken! megabluck yeah!!!
-
You have a weird definition for being a sporting person, and there's no way the Alien Overlord would have a role like this and not have a way for you to win when one of you got killed. I'm disappeared you play like such an megablock, but I suppose we're going to have to deal with it. Anyway. How are we supposed to trust a serial killer? We have no way of knowing if you've betrayed us or not. Nothing's keeping you from giving the scum the PR identities. Hell, maybe you already have...I'd rather lose this game than comply with someone like you.
-
So....it's been a couple hours. Have you come up with/answered anything yet, Helena? At this point I'm ready to lynch your wrinkley gray asp out.
-
I don't think Ariattney is the only one waiting for expiations for this stuff... I hope you have a lot of answers coming.
-
Interesting night...another Penis down, but at least (what I assume is) the serial killer got nailed...even if it seems to be by the scum? My question exactly.
-
Alright. I've taken a good look at the past three days, and I've got my suspect. Vote: Godric Goaty-Blather. Now, let's take a look at why. I think it's a general conensus this was unbelievably dumb. Here, he explains his vote - because of Arriateney's personality quirk (I'm assuming). Apparently he finds that suspicios and thinks there have been dumber reasons to vote for somebody. I'm unconvinced of that. And that's about it for Day One. Moving on to Day Two; He thinks Wong's a scared townie, which is understandable, but then lashes out at Panck for caling him out on accusations from the day before. Rather defensive, in my eyes. Then he goes and votes for the person he thinks is a scard townie, on account of his role being dangerous. What?? That's not how a townie plays. You don't lynch somebody immediately for screwing up with their action once. That's like trying to lynch the vig for accidentally killing a townie, or an investigator who got a framed result. If you thought he was townie but used his role poorly, why not try and talk some sense into or reason with him instead? Something that doesn't involve lynching someone you think is townie? He begins to doubt his own thoughts on Wong's allegience, admitting he could be the scummiest or the towniest. Just goes to show how much thought he puts into his suspicions... No, wait, he's leaning towards him being scum now. That explains a lot, especially considering how he's now suddenly going along with what everyone else thinks. Suspicions turning right around over the course of a few posts isn't smart, no matter your allegience. Oh, and that thing about not believing it's a one-shot? That's gone too. He thinks it's a one-shot. Just like everybody else! Shocking. And just to re-literature, Wong is no longer a scared townie, because according to the shop everybody else, he's actually extremely scummy. And now today's defense. He likes adding his own reason and wanted to get his own opinion in, yet agreed with everybody else voting for Wong to the point where he didn't even need to add anything else...quite the contraception, no? I keep hearing that he added something to the case against Wong, but I can't seem to find it. Could you grab a quote for this, Godric? Apparently he viewed Wong as bad news. True enough, if you consider a townie with a 'dangerous' action to be bad news...if not, then he thought Wong was bad news for half of yesterday. The second half. After his opinion on Wong completely flip-flopped. Just in case you frogot. Here, I've even made up a flash summary of it all! Disclaimer: This flash summary is not an all-encompassing accurate representation of the case against Godric.
-
That's pretty obvious, you haven't raised any suspicions against me that go beyond "he's got a middle-road attitude." Are you going to let Barkonius make the accusations for you? (Speaking of which, Barky, can you re-state them so I can defend myself?)
-
I missed this. Where'd he say that?
-
Motivated, no. That doesn't mean I'm not going to, as I implied. Going through half a dozen pages of voting, unvoting, and revoting just isn't very exiting.
-
Well, thanks anyway, vig. (I assume.) At least Krup's not floating around my radar like a dead fly in the toilet anymore. It's just frustrating to see such a useless person be townie, and the same goes for Wong. Can't the idiots get stuck on the scum team for once? So, four penises down...that's no good. The votes have been so all over the place the last two days, I almost don't want to have to sift through them all to look for sous-chefs...but what else can we do at this point?
-
You do realize that with your line of your thinking, that makes you look suspicious too, because you're doing the exact same thing? The reason I'm not voting for Wong is because I still think he's town. Just because my opinion differs from the majority of voters doesn't mean I'm doing it because I'll be able to say "I told you so" tomorrow. I'm doing it because I think Krup is scum and Wong isn't - I'm not going to sheep along with what everyone else thinks to maintain a low-key image. That's what scum are for. In addition to dressing up in scooby black duds and crow masks.
-
I don't even know anymore...everyone seems to think the degree to which Wong screwed up with his action is just too much to be townie. I half agree, there were a lot of other, smarter things he could've done. But I still can't bring myself to vote for someone I'm conceived is just a townie, no matter how terribly he messed up. That pretty much sums up my thoughts. I don't feel right letting him slide off the radar just because an even bigger idiot is flailing around and drawing everyone's attention. I'm going to Vote: Durmudgelous Krup. Even in the event Wong is scum - I'll admit it as a possibility, though a doubtful one to me - yesterday's Provocarus Curse fiasco was probably to keep Krup, a fellow scum, afloat.
-
Nevermind, I think I've got it. -First you say you thought Snarky was a scum or had an oddly speciic win condition. -Then you say by refusing to fight accusations he could've been sending out towntells, because only scared townies or scum would fight back (which is flawed logic, not grammar), so when night came, you began having second thoughts. -Then you mention defenses he could've made. -So while you say you were sure that Snarky was either scum or neutral at the time, you didn't vote for him, and only a few hours ago you said if you had another choice to save yourself you would've gone with it. Did I get all that?
-
What the hell are you going on about? I'm too bossy trying to untangle your grammar to figure out what your point is.
-
I agree with you there, but because his role is more common townie than it is scummy, I'm inclined to thick Wong just made a dumb call on that one. I could be wrong, but for now I'm leaning towards careless townie on him.
-
Can't say I'm surprised. Three innocent penises, still in the night. I agree with the general concept us that 'Toasty' there is our SK, while the Odor Eaters are the ones turning people stiff. A little annoyed to see Krup still around and making useless comments - well, at least he's just wrong today, rather than unhelpful, I guess...? - but I suppose not killing anyone was a better choice overall for the vig last night. Nevertheless, unless someone comes forward with some sort of helpful revolution, my vote today is going with Krup. On the canary, thine information bequeaths us with the opium of those who wouldst see folly with the thought that Flabflom was indeed be'stiffened not by thine vigilante nor by killer serial, but the blackness of Odor Eater, as well as that dear Snoot was discovered 'ere morning dead not by hand of vig nor Eater - nay, by killer serial did he meet his moste untimely end! ...What? He talks funny. My point is, it's interesting to see what people think of the situation, the best example of which seems to be Krup, given that his opinion on who kiled who differs wildly from everyone else's because he's so self-impotent he thinks the night actions revolve around him.
-
Oh, fun curse. Well, I've had to go back and take a good long look at Wang and Snickerpuss, and I think I found two posts that aqueductly describe both of them. And look, they both know it too. At least they're awning about it. Vote: Snarky Snickerpuss, I guess....while I think Wang's behavior is scummier than his, it's not scummier enough to dispute this gladiator claim. I hope at least the vig's paying a tension and will off Krup tonight...