-
Posts
53 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Drubulum Panck
-
Sorry folks, my shes needed carrying for, so I was stuck with them for a while. They're all sad to see me go. Does anyone else know how to take care of dragons? Perhaps I should leave it in Rufus' hands. He's the only fellow reptilian I've got here...unfortunately. Alright, I must apologize for my not being able to make my proposed list of suspects providing evidence of their scumminity, but I will try to just make a quick read on some folks and see what I can come up with. Firuz Fox: I'm almost certain you are scum. From how I see it, it has to be you or Belinda, but since I've voted for you and said what I had to say. You provided the crucial vote yesterday that lynched Barkonius over Helena, and, seeing that Barkonius flipped, town, it would certainly have been more beneficial for scum to get a doctor lynched, especially when it was likely that Helena would get the axe at night anyway. Belinda: If Firuz is scum, I doubt you would be. It's possible, but not too likely. However, if Firuz is town then you have to be scum. Lulu: You've blown hot and cold in my mind, but looking back I am not too sure of what do think. At present, we're 13 people remaining and I wouldn't be surprised if six of us standing are scum. You are the only one, besides myself obviously, to not vote for me today. Now if the scum are six and have no reason to keep up appearances ahead of tomorrow, I would fully believe that you are town. However, if town can survive the night, meaning there must be only five scum, then I wouldn't be surprised if you are one of them. You most certainly wouldn't be my first lynch target, because I don't have a clear reading on you yet, but down the line... I think it likely enough that scum would have wanted to mix up their votes yesterday, especially since they didn't, as far as I'm can tell, care who got lynched since it wasn't one of their own. In any case, Timly has been 100% useless and I wouldn't at all be surprised if he flips scum. Normally one of the real quiet or circle-talking folk are scum, and Regelius, Wong, Krup, and Snarky (You could add a couple of others to this list) all ended up town. I wouldn't be surprised if you are the felon hiding in our midst who happen to get lucky and wasn't caught by town or SK. Orion: You have similarly been somewhat useless. Many people have put you up decently high on their list of suspicion-list, but somehow I don't get that impression off you. I don't know why, but I think you're likely town. Ariattny and Gertrude: I really think one of you must be scum. I would lean on it being Gertrude more likely than Ariattny. Gertrude was always ready to shoot down any ideas that didn't quite go her way. The way that you do it makes me think that maybe you're trying too hard to attempt to lead the town, and look like a good, not-backing-down townie. Ariattny I do think is town. Obviously she must have done something right to get both me and Barkonius protecting her on NIght 2. I'm not sure about her, but I think she's more likely town than Gertrude. The next four I haven't had a really good reading on, especially Langstone and Barty, but if it were put down to it, I'd probably put those two as town and Rutherford and Dillpickle as scum. Just based on gut feeling. Dillpickle also seems keen on trying to confuse people, mix things up, and get people to vote the way he thinks they should. Twatty: Good chances she's scum. Blabbed about nonsense all game and really never struck me as being townie. Not a top priority as there are decent chances of her just being dumb and not scum at the same time, but still definitely strikes as being more scummy than town. Of course, I'm a bodyguard and not a investigator, so this could be all wrong, but I think there's decent chances it's right or that it's the opposite of right. If anyone catches my drift, to them. Good luck town, and even though I can't see us winning at this stage even if we do survive the night, my heart is with you. Take care of my babies when I'm gone and make sure my she-dragons aren't lonely if their alpha-male has to leave.
- 55 replies
-
- FABULAND
- FABULAND Mafia
- (and 7 more)
-
What do you mean by this, exactly? How does Firuz being the scum blocker effect me being a bodyguard? Firuz was seen targeting Helena when she was blocked along with Barkonius and myself. I know that Barkonius wass not scum and I know that I am not scum, it's only logical for me to conclude that Firuz is the scum blocker.
- 55 replies
-
- FABULAND
- FABULAND Mafia
- (and 7 more)
-
I've been looking back on some people's odd behaviour, although I couldn't get much passed Day 2, which is kind of frustrating, but sometimes my connection craps out on me. I'll start with Ariattny since she's first on the list: Looking back, at back it was not difficult to notice the way Ariattny pushed the “Scum share their actions” thing, which was proven to be not entirely true, at least not to the degree Ariattny said. Now what I wonder is did Ariattny have an agenda behind this? Was she town pushing to clear herself, or scum attempting to look like a town who did not know clearly how the scum actions worked? Or was she just town and confused? Ariattny then got somewhat offended when Barkonius pointed her out as trying to confuse the town. She later on gave an excellent and detailed look at the scumminess of Wong, the only problem was that when he was lynched later, Wong turned up town, so Ariattny could be a townie looking for scum, or a scumster wanting to appear town by picking up on a suspicious-looking townie and getting them lynched. (Of course, this could be said of Gertrude or myself as well). For some odd reason Ariattny did not seem to want to be one of the first to vote for Wang. She posted that great and detailed look into Wong’s posting history, but then failed to vote. Whereas before she seemed to think for certain that Wong was scum, she then said she was not sure he’s scum. When Catalina (a proven and generally good townie) looked disapprovingly at the comment Ariattny got defensive and made an odd statement about saying facts when not knowing facts. Maybe it’s just me, but somehow I don’t get it. On Day 3 Ariattny calls out Gertrude, but doesn’t really do anything about it. He called her out for pressing on Purplonia. Now Purplonia was not scum, so if Ariattny is scum, she would likely have thought that Purplonia was town, could she have been trying to set Gertrude up for the next day’s lynch? It should also be noted that Ariattny made only two comments in all Day 3. I found this comment somewhat amusing, Barty! You talk about quiet animals being suspicious beause they may be afraid to make mistakes. You are one of the quieter ones around. Were you speaking from experience when you said that?
- 55 replies
-
- FABULAND
- FABULAND Mafia
- (and 7 more)
-
Now that's just a complete lie. I told you that I only found out that Barkonius was the one who counter-claimed sometime in the beginning of Day 4. Why would you say otherwise? I believe you already told an untruth yesterday as well. You were snooping around suspiciously behind the scenes already and I'd bet my bollucks that you are scum.
- 55 replies
-
- FABULAND
- FABULAND Mafia
- (and 7 more)
-
I'm in a bit of puzzlement at the moment as to who I should choose between Belinda and Firuz. If Belinda were town and since she knew that both me and Barkonius were claiming a protector-type role, I would have assumed that she would have told us to guard different people. However, I have a harder time believing that we could have had a doctor, a bodyguard, and a one-shot protector. Barkonius was town and I know that I'm town, Firuz has been on a number of people's suspicion lists before now, so I think I will Vote: Firuz Foxtail
- 55 replies
-
- FABULAND
- FABULAND Mafia
- (and 7 more)
-
No, I claimed bodyguard. I am a bodyguard. Barkonius, originally, from what I can understand, claimed bodyguard, but with a half chance of surviving, until he publicly stated yesterday that he was, the doctor, I guess. Bodyguard and Doctor are both protector-type roles. I know that I am town, but at this point I'd almost judge you guys for not voting for me. What does strike me as odd was that Belinda knew at least me and Barkonius were claiming protector-type roles, yet she allowed us to both target Helena the night before last. Whereas one would assume that she would have used her position as the Watcher, if she is town, to try to organize things a bit. Firuz popping out of nowhere as a one-shot protector seems really odd, and I kind of think he must be scum because I doubt we could have a doctor, a bodyguard, and another one-shot protector as well. Sure, although I don't exactly understand what you want me to explain. It seemed unlikely to me that there were two protector-type roles, and knowing that I was town, I assumed Barkonius was scum. Belinda also seemed convinced that he was the most scummy between him, Firuz, and myself.
- 55 replies
-
- FABULAND
- FABULAND Mafia
- (and 7 more)
-
I understand that it only makes sense for you to lynch me today. It was me for Barkonius and Barkonius' flipped town. I know that I am town as well, which sucks, and considering that there is likely enough, six scum and seven townies today, I can't see us surviving the night. Still in case we do, I will try to invest what time I can in looking at the remaining folks and pointing out who must be scum. In the odd case that you lynch me and we survive the night, then you will have at least something to work off of. I am sorry for screwing town over, but I really didn't think we'd have two protector roles, but it seems like we do. Furthermore, either Belinda or Firuz must be scum or Helena was never blocked on Night 3. I kind of doubt the latter could be possible, unless she converted someone or something for we would probably have seen a kill. I do reckon that a lot of scum probably did switch their votes from Helena to Barkonius yesterday, as I don't think they would've passed up the opportunity to get two townies fighting head-to-head and lynching each other.
- 55 replies
-
- FABULAND
- FABULAND Mafia
- (and 7 more)
-
Just for the sake of those who haven't understood yet, and since I just realized now that it hasn't been mentioned, I'm a Bodyguard. I realize that I failed to mention who I targeted on Night 3, which was because I thought it was obvious, but I targeted Helena. Now Helena was blocked so that must make either me or Barkonius the scum blocker. Actually, Helena contacted me. I didn't contact Helena. You also have your facts a bit mixed up. Both of us targeted Helena last night and both of us targeted Ariattny on Night 2. Obviously scum wouldn't protect Helena, that's because Barkonius is not a protector but a blocker. That, as I see it goes against the basic rules of mafia. When there are conflicting claims you have to test the claim and see which one is scum. At this point we haven't caught a single scum so I think we need to worry about that first and foremost. I think we have to be willing to take the risk so that we will be certain of catching our first scum. I haven't spoken to you in private in a week. I didn't claim to Helena. I claimed to the Watcher. I targeted Helena because the Watcher asked me to.
- 277 replies
-
- Harriet Slutter
- Harriet Slutter Mafia
- (and 8 more)
-
I targeted Sugarbottom Night 2 after targeting Gertrude Night 1. I can't talk a lot now, unfortunately, but I think it seems reasonable to me to lynch a suspected scum today, rather than Helena. The scum are equally as wary of Helena as we are. We both need to take her out in order to win, so why not let the scum waste their kill on her, rather than us wasting a lynch on her. I know that it may not seem great to change your votes, now, but doesn't it make more sense to vote for scum than to vote for someone who scum will want to take out themselves. Right now, I think it makes the most sense for me to Vote: Barkonius Twitch. Come on town, forsake your pride for a day and vote for the likely scum.
- 277 replies
-
- Harriet Slutter
- Harriet Slutter Mafia
- (and 8 more)
-
Did you even read my post? You have posted nothing but trash today. Focus on what's important! Helena is being lynched. I never argued that fact, I even said it's our duty to lynch her. Barkonius, for instance, look at this post. What do you have to gain by telling Helena this? Don't you think we all realize that she is trying to stay alive for a reason? Don't you think she knows that as well? Why fill up space with needless comments like this. Again, who are you trying to convince? Helena? We're lynching her. Don't you realize that? What more do you have to prove? The lynch is set let other discussions begin. If you have nothing useful to say. Don't say it. It's difficult enough scanning through pages of material without having to waste time loading pages full of needless filler posts.
- 277 replies
-
- Harriet Slutter
- Harriet Slutter Mafia
- (and 8 more)
-
What I wonder is what you people are trying to accomplish by being such pickle-dickles? A few of you have mentioned that you don't care whether town or scum wins now so long as Helena is lynched. Great! What a great way to play! Talk about a lack of sportsmanship! We are supposed to lynch scum here, that's our main goal. That's the rules of life to go against that and saying you don't care is just a waste to us all and shows that the rules don't concern you so long as you can get the last laugh on the likes of Helena. Honestly, she's not worth your time. We can be pretty sure that Helena is not scum, because if she is she has to be a pretty idiotic one, but in our great desire to lynch Helena, let's not forget to look at other situations that need our attendance. Sure we're all mad at her. She's annoying and it is our responsibility to lynch her, so why not? I understand that, but let's not waste this day in arguing with someone who will not be convinced by your arguments and who cannot convince you of hers. Focus on what's going on around us. Scum are tearing apart the town bit by bit, and we've got to do something to change that. Why must you waste our day by posting such garbage-filled rants that don't help us with anything? Are you trying to convince the rest of us to vote for Helena? Maybe, but you don't think that we can see that she's a liar ourselves? The situation has been clearly laid out and I think it's pretty obvious what the possibilities are as far as Helena bluffing or being sincere, etc. Let's focus on more important things. Helena may be our lynch for today, but we've got tomorrow to think about as well. For now I'm blank, but I'm going to put on my thinking cap and try to come up with something. We all know we need it.
- 277 replies
-
- Harriet Slutter
- Harriet Slutter Mafia
- (and 8 more)
-
Listen "matey", you deliberatly lied to us by claiming that Purplonia was town. Lynch all liars as the saying goes. Clearly you are not town or there would have been no reason to lie. What are you waiting for exactly? Trying to give us the least time possible to make a decision? And it seems like the scum have done the only useful thing for us this game in killing Purplonia.
- 277 replies
-
- Harriet Slutter
- Harriet Slutter Mafia
- (and 8 more)
-
Wow! Major coming in here. Trying to twist her words around, are you? Ping! ...or whatever. If I were someone else, I would say, "Wow AtE there," or something of the like, but since I'm not a fluffy little farm animal, but a really wise old dragon I'll just say that that really sounds like an Appeal to Emotion. I have to disagree with you there. It's not impossible that they are in fact on different teams. The fact is that Helena has, from what I have seen, not stated clearly that she discovered Godric to be scum (please point me out if I am wrong on this), so I don't think she's actually 100% certain that Godric will flip scum. That would leave us stuck in the same position as we were today after the Wang lynch failed, if Godric were to flip town. Would we take it out on Helena? We could, but I am sure someone will mention that Helena, being town, would not have known who she was lynching. Still, I voted for Godric originally, I think he is the scummiest here, and what Helena said, does make me stand a bit more firmly on that vote.
- 134 replies
-
- Mafia
- Harriet Slutter
- (and 8 more)
-
I was looking back at Purplonia's talk on Day 1, but it didn't strike me as particularly scummy. She talked about how lynching a vocal person usually doesn't turn up well for town, but then said that it would be easy for an odor eater to hide out among us. She then pointed Nicholas out for Nick's speaking nonsense and Odd, to say this as I didn't see Twatty's talk of Krup to be particularly telling against Krup. Defends Krup somewhat, still makes sense to me. 10th person to vote against Krup She then chastises Wong for using his action. Claims the unlikelihood of "Gladiator" being a scum role. Nothing we don't already know. Here he explains why he doesn't think Wong is scum and points out, in a manner of speaking, Godric for his idiotic words. Confusion regarding "They/It." Uses opportunity to poke Twatty a bit. A little odd if you ask me. May be scum? Slip-up? Not likely, but it's possible. Still in theory what he says is true. If you don't think someone is suspicious, don't vote for them. Calls out Gertrude and votes for her for not voting Krup. I find this odd. Gertrude clearly said that she found them both suspicious. It sounds like Purplonia may have had a good idea that Wong and Krup would both turn up town in the morning and was hoping to already start a thing going against Gertrude. I have to say thought that it's not anything incredibly scummy from her, though. Her vote on Day 1 was pretty late on, as far as the Krup votes went and on Day 2 she just kind of voted, but it seemed without any serious intention. Most of what I would call scum-tells came from today, though, and I don't think I need to point those out. The way I see it, is that it would be very difficult for me to think that Purplonia and Gertrude are both on the same team. Of course, Townies don't know who is who, but still something about them makes me think that they are not both town. Honestly, I see the case against Godric as being a bit more water-tight at this point than the cast against Purplonia. Vote: Godric Goaty-Blather Oops, some of those PMs, I was going to delete because they seemed to lack importance, which was why I wrote a summary about them. I must have forgotten to delete them though. *by PMs I meant quotes of course.
- 134 replies
-
- Mafia
- Harriet Slutter
- (and 8 more)
-
Do you honestly have that much of a town read on both Purplonia and Godric that you're unwilling to lynch either of them?
- 134 replies
-
- Mafia
- Harriet Slutter
- (and 8 more)
-
The votes are quite evenly split for now. I tend to see that as a good thing. It must mean that we're getting closer to the Odor Eaters and they're doing their best to make a lynch not happen. I see the points against Purplonia and Godric as being about even at this point. I would probably pursue my former thoughts of lynching Godric, but his synopsis or whatever you want to call it, on what people have said, etc, just doesn't strike me as something a scumster would do. I will try to look back on what they both have said the past few days, especially Purplonia since Rutherford already made a decent list against Godric. I can't say I care for the way you're trying to split the vote further DIll and Orion.
- 134 replies
-
- Mafia
- Harriet Slutter
- (and 8 more)
-
I have to say that looking over Rutherford's comments from yesterday there isn't really a whole lot of substance at all, something I hadn't really caught earlier due to his posts not being too short in general. Surprise, surprise, though, he only made six posts in total yesterday. I guess sometimes it's a bit hard to keep track of who is saying what when we are all somewhat unfamilar to one another. Anyway, I looked over the list and couldn't find anything particularly scummy. Perhaps it's just because I'm tired now. He is rather unhelpful though. He also doesn't commit to the bandwagon or to any of the other more serious accusations being spun, but votes for Krup (which I don't think in itself can be seen as particularly scummy. However, he does wait for the mousey thing to vote first. Maybe I will try to look a this posts on Day 1, but for now I don't think his level of scumminess really surpasses others by an incredibe extent.
- 134 replies
-
- Mafia
- Harriet Slutter
- (and 8 more)
-
I'm sorry. I'm busy looking over yesterday's thread, I'll get back to you if I think your lynch is worth pursuing. At this point our track record on lynching people similar to you hasn't been great, so I'm not certain whether to start going for it again or not.
- 134 replies
-
- Mafia
- Harriet Slutter
- (and 8 more)
-
Whoa, the punctuation was poor in that last bit. My apologies, but I think the meaning is still understandable.
- 134 replies
-
- Mafia
- Harriet Slutter
- (and 8 more)
-
Seems to be some concerns about my "beautiful work of art". No, I didn't pre-write it. I wrote it today. I sent messages, as I mentioned, to two people and already had the Wong-related potato messages saved for further study, so the play didn't take long to write, and I didn't have to be online (whatever that is) to do it, which made it easy for me. Originally, I thought that Flimflam had been killed by taking the bath, so I assumed the Catalina had been scum-killed. It seemed too odd to be a coincidence to me that Catalina who had played such a crucial part in discovering information against Wong would be killed the night after we lynched Wong and they both turned up town. That's one of the reasons why I wrote the play so you could help me determine who would be the most likely to be lying/have something to hide, for which reason they would kill Catalina. Furthermore, I had told someone that if Wong turned up town, I would stoop so low as to write a play about the fiasco, and I had to make good on my promise. I also wasn't sure if Wong was trying to attempt a sting or something by being so scummy and if so, if he gotten any leads that he had shared with a survivor of the night. http://www.eurobricks.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=81811&st=75#entry1577584 By the way, Dillpickle, as shown in the post, which is the only one the I believe Orion mentioned it. He didn't ask Wong to use his curse only to claim once he already used it. Unless, he did say what you're saying he did elsewhere. That's something of a lie, matey.
- 134 replies
-
- Mafia
- Harriet Slutter
- (and 8 more)
-
An ode to Wong (alternatively, the odd that's Wong): Act 1, Scene 1, Day 1: A cute, fluffy fabuland animal sits twiddling his thumbs. Let’s call him P1. P1: *twiddle, twiddle* Krup Enters. Krup: Hey, I know that there is a bandwagon going against me, but you shouldn’t vote for me today or tomorrow. P1: Oh…okay…well, right now I’m more suspicious of Snarky than you anyway. Krup: Great. I’ll feed you any information I get my hands on. By the way, I can be your mouthpiece if you have a plan. P1: Uh…okay? The only plan I have now is to find the scum and lynch them, so… Curtains close. Act 2, Scene 1, Day 2: A cute fabuland animal sits twiddling his thumbs. Let’s call him Panck, Drubulum Panck. Panck: *twiddle, twiddle* P1 Enters: P1: Hey, Panck, I’ve been giving this pamphlet out and thought you may want to read it to. “I got this weird message from Krup. He didn’t want me to lynch him on Day 1 or 2. I think he may be a neutral with a strange win condition that he needs to survive until Day 3. He also said he’d be my mouthpiece if I have a plan. It sounds like he’s probing for a PR.” Anyway, we chatted and he told me about his suspicions regard Krup, Flab, and Dill. He thought Flab and Dill were scummy. He asked me if I was the cop, roleblocker, or just vanilla. I’m not sure how he got this idea. Panck: Both things are odd. Since obviously the “he” you mentioned in the second bit can’t be Krup, who is it? P1: Wong. Panck: Do you mind making mention of some of this in thread? P1: zzzzzzzzzzzzzz Panck: Perhaps I’ll do some investigation on my own then. Curtains Close. Act 2, Scene 2, Day 2: Wong: I’m so scummy. Panck: Yo, pal! It seems like you’ve been fishing for power roles. Know what I mean? Wong: Is that so? Panck: Uh huh. Do you know who I am talking about or have you been fishing from more than one person’s pool? Wong: I’m just a one-shot gladiator. Panck: Hey, answer the question, scummy. Somebody said you asked them to claim. Do you know who I’m talking about or have you asked so many people Wong: Oh dear, I’ve asked too many people. I’ve only talked to you, P1, P2, and Catalina Interlude: Catalina (speaking from beyond): Hey! Why is my name visible and not P1 and P2s? Writer: Because you’re dead silly! Catalina (speaking from beyond): I still think it’s unfair. Back to the play: Panck: So who of those did you ask to role claim to you? Wong: All of them. They all claimed vanilla. Panck: *leaves room* Act 2, Scene 3, Day 2: P2: *touches himself* Panck: Hey, matey. I hear Wong was trying to get you to claim by PM. Is that true? P2: Nah! Why do you ask? Panck: He was fishing for others’ roles and when I poked him he said you claimed vanilla to him. P2: He’s dumb and/or lying. I didn’t claim to him anything. Act 3, Scene 1, Day 2: Wong: I hope that mean dragon doesn’t come back… Panck: Hello! Wong: Uh, oh! Panck: Why were you fishing? That’s scummy. Wong: I want to find out who is what and who to trust. Panck: That is a totally scummy thing to do. Wong: Well, I’m trying to work through them to find out what others are claiming. Panck: Wow! You really are scum! Act 3, Scene 2, Day 2: Catalina: Purr, purr! Panck: You’ve been speaking with Wong, I hear. Did she ask you to claim? Catalina: Nope. Who told you this? I spoke with Wong, but I was the one asking him questions. Panck: He told me so himself. Care to tell me what passed between you? Catalina: Sure thing. I asked him who he was suspicious of and he said Lulu and Dill. Krup, he said, is probably a town newbie. He said he thinks P2 and I are trustworthy. He never asked me to claim. I just sent him a text now in fact and he said something about “thinking like scum to beat them.” It makes no sense to me. He said he wants people to open up to him. Panck: He said you claimed vanilla. First he was saying he wanted people to claim so he could find out who to trust. Now he said he wants to work through you to find out what others are claiming. Catalina: Really? Panck: Yep. Interestingly enough, he said P2 claimed to him, when P2 didn’t. He also said P1 did. P1 actually did though, from what he told me. Catalina: *profanity* What is Wong up to? Panck: *shrugs* Catalina: I texted him asking who he spoke to apart from me and P2 Panck: … Catalina: He read my text, but won’t respond. Panck: Scary! Catalina: Now he did. Said he talked to one other person, Krup. He didn’t mention P1 at all. He’s totally scum. Mind if I let people know? Panck: Sure. I’m sleepy. …zzzzzzzzzzzzzz Ladies and gentlemen that was the story the transpired yesterday. At night I sent most of the details to two fellows in case I wouldn’t survive the night for some odd reason. I was like 95% certain the Wong would flip scum after that fiasco, and who wouldn’t have been? I found it odd that Catalina was killed this morning by whom I thought was the scum killer and that seemed more than coincidental, but now looking back it seems like it was the rabbit, Regelius, that was killed in the same manner as Catalina, therefore making it more likely an SK. Still why go for Catalina? There were quieter folk around. Also why would Wong lie about getting people to claim? Some kind of sting thing? Could anyone else be lying? Most of those I was suspicious were of have been killed, but there are still some folks around for example Timly and Godric who have both blipped my scumdar a fair bit.
- 134 replies
-
- Mafia
- Harriet Slutter
- (and 8 more)
-
If you had claimed it then likely we would have leaned slightly more towards Krup than yourself. Not likely, but possible. If the vote hadn't switched, you could still have used it after consulting with others who to use it on. You used the role anyway, so though you may still have had to use it, you could have at least had more information on who to use it on, if you will. Why would the scum want to take you out if you had a one-shot role like that? It's not like it's that threatening to them. If they wanted to form a campaign against you, also, they could easily have done so in the twenty-four hours we had. About Ariattny: care to be any more specific or will continue to be vague as you always have been? Why is it impossible that they are scum together? I'm not saying with total confidence that they both are scum or that either is, but I seriously suspect that at least one of them is, and I wouldn't be surprised if they both turn up scum. Let's look at it this way. If we had lynched Wong, as it seemed we would, then we would still have suspicions and probably lynch Krup the next day, correct? If you are them and you are scum, what do you do? You try to get people talking about something else. Warning, hypothetical conversation following: Scum says: "Gladiator is a normally townie role. Let's use that on Snarky so the focus will be on Snarky and Wang, then Wang can claim, people will naturally think he's town and go after Snarky. We get a townie lynch, and Wang runs off scott free. Hopefully, it will also have distracted enough attention from Krup as well." If that's their goal then the Day 1 part worked and the Day 2 part seems to be working in at least a few people's minds. I'm not saying that I can't be wrong and that there isn't a chance that one of them is town or they both are town, but I certainly wouldn't discount the possibility of them both being scum. Understand? Umm...no, you wanted to bandwagon on somebody who had gotten penalty votes, but wasn't really scummy at all. Did you really just realize this now? Don't worry, tomorrow's lynch is already reserved for Krup as far as I'm concerned. Nobody necessarily thought Wang was town yesterday, speaking for myself at least. Both Wong and Snarky were equally scummy, but Snarky seemed a bit moreso than Wong, hence the vote. How do you know the scum are staying far away from each other in thread? I had never heard of the role before either, but I am assuming that when most people had seen it they would've looked it up and seen that it is usually a town role.
-
Why? Of course, he was trying to save himself, it's true, but making us choose between himself and Snarky would ensure that there was no possibility of us voting out Krup. I'm not saying that even if he is scum he used the gladiator for that purpose, but it certainly is possible. Besides, it was only after he claimed that people switched their votes to Snarky, before that the votes were almost all on him. Anyway, it certainly seems odd that previously he had voted for Krup, but then when he went into the arena he chose to go against Snarky. I don't think any of us were particularly convinced that Wang was town yesterday, after his claim though, it did just seem slightly more likely that Snarky was scum than Wang. See above. It wasn't that one or the other was scummy, the fact was that they were both horribly scummy and Wang still is. That's why we're voting for him. Why do you think Wang collected a fair number of votes before he pulled his gladiator thing? Because he was scummy. Actually, I think you're wrong there. A scum would be more likely to use it early than a town would. Of course, Wong was in a bad situation, but still I think if he were town he would have at least consulted others before using his action. Don't you think so too? That's garbage. I think the very fact that is more often a townie role, and some people were really pushing that, is a good enough reason why the scum would use it. Trying to get people to stop voting for Wong, are you? A bit odd, don't you think, especially with theories floating around that you may be on the same scummy We are looking into voting out the scummiest person around for now, in my opinion. Why are you so convinced Wang is town? Why do we need to move on and follow other leads, so that your scummy buddy won't be lynched? The results of the Day 1 lynch has done nothing to clear Wong. Sorry, if some of the points have already been answered, I'm just catching up now. team? Oops, my post got mixed up while adding quotes. The "team? " part was supposed to go after the "you may be on the same scummy" part.
-
Wow, just wow! You think he's a scared townie with an action that you don't like and are afraid he'll use every day? That's your reason to vote for him? Seriously, if he actually is a townie and somehow the role is reuseable and not one-shot, then I'm sure he wouldn't continue to use the role for nonsense, hopefully. This is a really, really pitiful reason to vote the way you did. I mean, Wong has been acting scummy all day today and all day yesterday, and yet you settle on this as your reason to vote for him? Great job, buddy! Maybe it's just me, but it seems a bit of an odd thing to vote for someone just to get them talking on Day 2. On Day 1 it's somewhat acceptable, but Day 2? (I have noticed that your changed your vote, but this still seems a bit odd to me) Diggin' this comment. You're really exhibiting some scummy behaviour there, Timly. Still can't say you've done anything to lessen my suspicions of you.
-
Oh! I somehow missed that. Why does it make me suspicious? It was odd behaviour that I'm calling you out on. So what were you hoping to discover through your poke in the dark? Did you discover anything? For now, I am hesitating between voting for Krup and Wong again. Wong's not seeming to have gotten the town PM does seem suspicious, but it's possible that he just wasn't paying attention to it as he doesn't seem to have been paying attention to the Day Thread much either. I'm still not sure about the whole Gladiator deal being a scum role. There definitely is something very wrong about Wong, so I think I will vote: Wong Wang again.