Boris Biddlesdorf
-
Posts
19 -
Joined
About Boris Biddlesdorf
Recent Profile Visitors
549 profile views
-
Bad goblin! Very, very bad goblin! No treat for you.
-
I was just messin' with ya, Dickory. I'm not convinced about this lying thing. I would love for Wang's side of the story to be told but that seems unlikely with the amount of time left in the day. It seems that it could be a misunderstanding, since Wang doesn't appear to be the sharpest tool in the shed. I also can't seem to get around the circumstances of how the gladiator curse was used. I just don't see scum using it this early. I can see them using it later in the game when a mislynch matters more. I'm going to Vote: Godric Goaty-Blather. I just think he's scummier at this point. Not that it really matters anyway. I keep joshin' with Dickory, But I think a vote for Godric gets town closer to victory.
-
Okay, maybe I got you confused with Godric about that particular point. Goats look all the same to me. But your reasons for not voting for Krup are still stupid. I still stand by those. I get the impression that Krup sent messages to just about everybody yesterday. That, in itself, isn't suspicious to me. Can you tell us the circumstance under which he lied about contacting Krup? How would it have benefitted him? This old dog somethimes gets confused, How many times will the phrase "lynch all liars" be used?
-
Oh, come on. Just because you put a question mark at the end doesn't make it a question. Okay, maybe technically, but it's lazy. I think you're confused about how a town vote works. The point isn't about having a unanimous vote, it's about voting out scum. If you don't think Wang is scum, don't vote for him. Voting for him but reserving the right to say that you knew he was town tomorrow is scummy. There was absolutely no danger whatsoever of upsetting the vote against Wang here with one vote for Krup. Thnking otherwise is either stupid or a poorly thought out justification for a vote you know a townie wouldn't make. I don't think most of us are trusting just his word that it's a one-shot action. We're trusting to the fact that the creator of this story about furry wizards wouldn't unbalance the game by making such a role a recurring one. It would be tremedously overpowered. Even if you believed it wasn't one shot, you still don't say that you really think Wong is scum. If this situation was tremendously unbalanced in favor of us, the town, becuase of this ability, why do you want it gone so badly? Can you clarify this? How do you know he's lying? Whoops, forgot to rhyme. Dickory is being a lazy RP bum, People should only vote for who they think are scum.
-
I think the theory that Wang used his curse to get Krup out of trouble is bunk. Not quite as bad as "interludes tell us who has night actions" Krup's theory but still bunk. Basically, you guys think this because Wang chose Snarky instead of Krup for the gladiatorial match up. I think momentum had cooled for Krup's lynch before the point Wang used the curse. If he saved anyone, it was himself. I really don't think we can determine if either is scum based on the affiliation of the other. I do think the if Krup had anyone on his team, he'd say smarter things. I'm still on the fence about Wang, though. I'd still place even money that he's town. I'll have to do some research and thinking before placing a vote but it's still early yet. Wang just saved his own butt, Krup strikes me as a dim nut.
-
Even if you believed him to be a neutral, aren't there a few mich more likely roles such a neutral could have had? I would think a "survivor" would have put up some kind of fight instead of the repeated apathy he spouted. At this point, I'm not sure that Krup being alive is reason to lynch him. Just seems to be a bit of an idiot to me. He seems a bit conceded as well. I'm still on the fence about Wang. I find it much more likely that the gladiator role would be a town one, but it could go the other way. I don't blame him for picking Snarky as the other candidate since Snarky was putting off some scum vibes. Someone needs to stop taking their stupid pills. You think the scum killed Flabflom because of an interlude about magical furballs performing magic tricks? Seriously, pal, I hope the scum are that stupid to base nightkills on junk like that. It'd certainly increase the odds of us beating them. I'm not sure if those two are scum, But Krup's theories are certainly dumb!
-
Have the goblins been spiking my tea with whiskey again? Bad goblins! As for Wong being the one to use the ability, it could be a town role. In fact, a townie would be more likely to throw away the powerful ability early on since he wouldn't have scum teammates to pass it on to upon death or to confer with to use properly. I still say Snarky is acting scummier. If he isn't scum, it's not the kind of attitude a townie should have. Vote: Snarky Snickerpuss Sorry, almost forgot to rhyme. This whole day has just been screwy, I hope that Snarky goes kablooey!
-
The more I hear from Krup, the more I feel like he's a clueless townie drowning in a sea of inexperience. There's a chance that he's experienced scum putting on an act, but it'd have to be an awfully good one and if he were reall that good, he wouldn't have gotten in that situation in the first place. I feel I should Unvote: Durmudgelous Krup. Snarky has not quelled any misgivings I've had about him. Blatantly voting with a bandwagon for the sake of bandwagoning isn't much better than jumping on someone for making a mistake. His entire attitude does not seem to be townie based. Vote: Snarky Snickerpuss I'll let old Krup off the hook, But Snarky still seems like a crook.
-
I agree that Sugarbottom is probably not scum. My post that you quoted reflects that. Look, I can do this, too: Not reading a post well enough to understand it, scummy. Ping. Krup, it's nice to see that you are trying to defend yourself now. And in public. Since there's plenty of time left in the day, I'm going to hold off on unvoting. I'd like you to clarify this whole thing about Sugarbottom's prying. And explain a little bit better why you responded to the serious accusations the way that you did. If I were to place a different vote, I'm leaning more towards Snark than anyone else. The attitude of "anyone but me" is not a townie one. Maybe there's an interested third party floating around that needs to look out for him or herself. Sometimes I just have to roll my eyes, A townie plays for the team and tries!
-
And if I ignored your comments and vote without making some kind of defense, you'd say that was scummy behavior as well. There's really no way to talk to you, so I don't think I'll try anymore. Better for my blood pressure that way. I don't think you're scum but you're mooing up the wrong tree. Krup does seem scummy and I think he's been given enough of a chance to explain his statements. I think he seems scummy, not because he talked to someone privately but because of the way he responded to the accusation and the resulting back-and-forth with Sugarbottom. Vote: Durmudgelous Krup Of replying to Sugarbottom, I've had enoup, Then because of behavior I voted for Krup!
-
Um...what? Now's the time to tell truths, Krup, not hide behind roleplaying personality quirks. Try it again. Voting for people because of their roleplaying personality is stupid. And if we were to do so, there's plenty of people around here than a cow that can't count. Don't blame me. I think he's stupid, too. It's amazing how stupid some people can be, It's like they don't know how to play, you see! * imeant there a plenty of people more annoying than a cow that can't count. Sorry for mis-speaking.
-
I don't care what fraction of the day had passed, we obviiously have diffrent definitions of the word "beginning". You want to start a misguided lynch on that, go ahead. I consider myself active because I'm talking and helpful because I was turning the conversation away from weiners and gender confusion and back towards the crisis at hand. Perhaps you don't see it that way, but I do. We can have a difference of opinion without either of us being scum. I do find it odd how focused you are on me. Just go ahead and ignore any other converasation going on. I don't know what to say to convince you of my innocnence. If you can't see it, it's your loss. I'm confused at how PMing is ballsy or scummy at this point. Is there some new rule that says PMs are forbidden until day 2? How is someone talking in private a solid lead? Krup's words confuse me as well. Why admit to doing something wrong when it wasn't wrong? How did you "take it too far"? Maybe you can explain this misplaced guilt. I'm as innocent as I can be, This whole PMing lead seems like hooey.
-
It was hardly the beginning of the day. There was plenty of fluff goin' on before I spoke my piece. I'm not trying to seem active and helpful, I am active and helpful. Someone's gotta train them goblins and no one else wants to do it. I gave my opinion on the lurkers, and on the useless fluff that was being spread around. And really thats your only reason to vote for me. Because I'm not spouting fluff. I'd counter your other three points but they don't really exist, now, do they? What exactly have you been doing, Miss Counting Cow? I could say your nonsense vote seems as likely to be you trying to seem helpful as my candor was. I don't find you overly suspicious myself, though.
-
I'm just saying that. No one really screams scum to me right now. I am concerned that we have some members that are choosing to remain relatively silent. There's been a decent amount of time for people to post a few times. I think that it may be more likely for scum to try to lurk since we can't blame previous behavior for current behavior. It would be somewhat lazy for normally outspoken people to become lurkers to hide as scum but if there's one thing I believe in, it's laziness. It makes the world go round... Or it would if it really felt like it. Dickory's speech may be impaired, But for talking at least he seems prepared!
-
You might be getting better about that speech thing. That first sentence was hardly a question. I'd hardly consider myself overeager. My pants are still dry, see? It just semed to me that the conversation was getting more than a little derailed. I understand perfectly well that the first day of these situations are filled with fluff, I just figured we should broach the subject of, I don't know, lynching scum at some point today. If folks want to talk about gender misunderstandings and such, more power to them. I know I'm a (*checks in pants*) dude, so I think that puts me ahead of the game somewhat. Guess I'll just observe for a while, then, while you furballs sort those things out. Nicholas' speech might be getting better, Bruno is certainly no pants-wetter!