Tommi1983

I think it is absolutely impossible but even if it was it's pointless (at least in my opinion) to build it in such a short time. I spent almost 3 days building Unimog.

Thank you for advices. I'm going to contact LEGO. I agree that the pneumatic technology is poor and should be improved. Pneumatics could be very interesting when it worked properly.

Hi, I have a small problem with crane's claws of Unimog. I built this set recently and I've noticed a problem with them. When I close the claws without any object inside (so they are closed maximally) I can't open them again by th switch and I must touch them and slightly help to open. However sometimes this problem doesn't occur (I don't know why) and also after non-maximal closing (with something inside) it always does properly and I can open them. Do you know something about it?

I have motorized it by standard Power Functions set and I must admit that it gives a big improvement to this set but even without motorization it is very good. I can give even 9/10.

Absolutely the nr 1 set from the Series, at least in the meaning value/money. It is great, I have it. Original building is similar to Scandinavian design which I like and this set reflects it very well.

Thak you for the cool review. I have this set too and it's great. I would like to share with you my opinion. The idea of the Architecture series is not to build 100% realistic replicas of the buildings but to reflect an essence of them from the artistic and architectural point of view using only basic, standard LEGO bricks, and I think it's very good idea which makes Series distinguished and exclusive. Slovenian architect did it really good in this set. What about a clock brick. I don't know what to think about it. LEGO has had this brick with clock from many years ago and it shows a clock, so why not use it in this set? From the other hand it slightly provides a kind of dissonance to the rest of the project. However, all in all I think it is a good idea to use it and I can't find better solution.