That’s completely fair — I think most people here would probably say the same.
I’m not really looking at it as “investing” either. I buy sets because I like them, and I’m not trying to optimise for returns or anything like that.
What I found though is that once your collection gets a bit larger, it becomes surprisingly hard to keep a clear picture of what’s going on — not just the value, but things like how it’s changed over time, or which sets are actually moving vs just sitting there.
Using BrickLink for checking prices is exactly what I was doing as well. The part I found tricky was keeping that consistent over time without it turning into a bit of a spreadsheet exercise.
So it’s less about “is this a good investment?” and more just:
having a consistent reference point
seeing how things evolve over time
and not having to manually keep everything up to date
But yeah, I completely get the “just enjoy the sets” side — that’s definitely the main thing.
That’s really helpful — and honestly very familiar.
What you described is pretty much exactly the path I went down as well:
Brickset for the overall picture, then Excel to fill in all the gaps — especially for things like BrickLink orders, Pick-a-Brick, and the odd purchases that don’t fit neatly anywhere else.
It does work, but like you said, it gradually turns into something you have to maintain rather than something that just gives you a quick overview.
The time aspect you mentioned is actually a big part of why I started building something for myself. Not to change the approach, but to try and keep the same kind of visibility without having to keep everything updated manually.
Completely get what you mean about interests shifting as well — LEGO has a way of expanding into all sorts of directions 🙂
Really appreciate you sharing how you approached it — it’s useful to see how others have handled the same problem over a longer time horizon.