DavejspTechnicMOCs

deleted

@Void_S Thanks for expressing your support, i really appreciate it. In all honesty, the virtual pivot steering wasn't originally planned for this car, i was creating the MOC and also messing around with this kind of steering trying to figure out a simple way to controll it, and the solution i ended up with just happened to fit this car quite nicely (i know it adds more complexity, and is kind of overkill for this simple build), but i was like, why not... and here it is.

Yeah, i think you got a point there.

I really appreciate the support @JopieK, thanks, it fuels my passion. Design the model, create the instructions, create the renderings, take photos, create a video, publish all that online is in fact a lot of work, very time-consuming. Well, seems this MOC topic is going kinda off-topic with thise feedback discussion and such, which was not my intention at all. Sorry for that.

Thanks for the support guys. Much appreciated. I will still continue doing my thing, which is small to medium remote-controlled cars with simple or disproportionate designs, with maybe some interesting mechanics/concepts here and there :D

And i appreciate it! Thanks for your contructive comment.

Yeah, this MOC, and my MOCs in general are not meant for audiences who like realistic builds, at all. My objective is to make a car with exaggerated looks, kind of childish even, that's easy and quick to build, and yes, i'm under a tight piece budget, none of my MOCs reached 600 pieces, it is small for performance of course. Well, i'm totally fine quitting my posts here if they generate a negative response from users, i understand eurobricks community prefers high-piece-count, detailed and realistic looks and mechanisms and stuff; i just wanted to reach out to other people like me within the community, thought there was a space for these simpler models too.

deleted

deleted

deleted

deleted

Thanks, yeah, it's my own version.

Hi, i might try using that frame and test it out. I actually considered using a flat version but didn't go forward with it because it uses the old 4L differential, which a lot of people don't have. I understand and you got a point there, i just mentioned buwizz because it can deliver higher voltage to the motors, making it go faster. The objective with this MOC was really to achieve this kind of control using standard lego parts and source most of the necessary parts from a set that a lot of people have. Thanks.

deleted

deleted

deleted

deleted

deleted

Thanks for sharing your point of view. Yeah, i just found it odd, so many views and almost no comments, but it's ok, really. I dunno lol english is not my native language and it just sounded cool to me, so, yeah, why not call it dunner XD By the way, does that name resemble any word it shouldn't? Or sounds bad in english? Oh, i perfectly understand that, thanks.

Thanks for the support, i really appreciate it. I dunno what's up with eurobricks comunity... my thread has nearly 400 views at this point and only you went forward to say you find it cool. Maybe there's simply no interest for this kind of MOC...

deleted

deleted

Yeah, i kinda was forced to do that because this is a pure C-Model, i had to use the available parts to build it, and the front axle really needed stability, so sacrifices were made, but i'm considering releasing a non-C-model version with additional parts and improvements.

deleted

Done. Is it acceptable now?