Benicia Bear

HELLO AGAIN HELLO AGAIN HELLO AGAIN FENCE-SITTING HIPPO DENIES SITTING ON FENCE ONCE MORE FORGETFULNESS RAMPANT IN ..... THIS PLACE THANK YOU for working on clearing this up. I'd said (in the thread) I sang the first lullaby that came to my head, which I shall reprise for you now: YOU ARE MY SUNSHIIIINE MY ONLYYYYY SUNSHIIIINE YOU MAKE ME HAPPPYYYYYY WHEN SKIES ARE GRAAAAAY AS YOU CAN imagine, the baby dwagons told me very quicky they loved it and they were completely asleep so fast, so I could stop now. Twinkle twinkle little star would have been my choice had I known, though. ONTO OTHER business: EACH MORNING we have been convening to report in our actions. In addition to being so keen to claim Baby Dwagon baf, you were also very keen early yesterday morning to tell us you used the Normalizer action, even though you didn't see the need for it. (You didn't see the need for it because you knew I'd keep my word because you know I'm not scum! ) Today you didn't say anything at all about your night action when you posted first thing: This was in the midst of conversation where everyone was literally reporting their night actions and discussing them. It actually make you look like you were busy giving out bombs (or hopefully just a single bomb). It's not like you've had a whole load of other stuff to say. And it really is important, how can you think it's not important when everyone else is reporting their night actions? And was it "not important" or were you "testing" Leatrix? This, of course would only work with the assumption that the bath-giver would RECEIVE SOME KIND OF NOTIFICATION OH MY GOOOOOOD YOU GUYS!!! DO WE KNOW ANYONE ELSE WHO RECEIVED A NOTIFICATION???? WE DO! THE FOX! LOVELY APPEAL to emotion here, but you've not contributed anything, as Leatrix has surprisingly correctly pointed out. I think you made that mess yourself. WELL NOW THAT'S a little bloodthirsty. And unneccesary. You do notice this theory (me apparently lying about getting a notification) has now fallen apart? You even helped. ANOTHER +1 for the soft defense. Foxy, what would be a better way to look like a dumb townie than forgetting to send in your night action (to leave you freeeeee from the obligations of having to prove anything while you go out to block or try to kill people)? Yeah, no baby dwaggon hater would ever do that, like eveeeer. Oh and Hyacinth was hippoing around yesterday telling everyone what her role was before she even "failed" to use it, so are you just trying a bit too hard to pretend you're not priviy to information here? JUST REMIND ME PLEASE, why is that? I'm a NUISANCE?? WHAT KIND OF REASON IS THAT?? That sounds, like Gilford said, like you just want to seize this opportunity to try to lynch me. THIS IS, BIZAARELY the most helpful thing you've said. The recipient of the Baby Dwagon action receives notification, thank you. Is this how Hyacinth knew that Leatrix should have had a notification? You know, in Hyacinth's "plan" to see Leatrix's reaction when she didn't get one? So the remaining scum are you, the Hippo and....? My goodness, I could vote for both of you (except I actually can't, in case anyone thinks that's a soft claim). For consistency, and because Foxy said she'd vote for her too (thanks!), I will: VOTE: HYACINTH HIPPO

She said she did. We don’t actually know what she really did. She was scum, and scum lie. Even if she did protect someone, why would she choose a scum buddy to give as her target? Why not choose someone like me, who had already been deemed townie enough for someone else (Corrina on that night) to protect? Like I said earlier, she knew she’d be safe to do that because the role stopper had already claimed to target Mobley and the other investigative roles were turned off.

I still don’t get why? Because I tracked the guy who was a lot of people’s top choice for a lynch yesterday, who fortunately turned out to be vig-killing a scum?

As I have already said, I was literally just sent a role PM in the morning saying I sang a lullaby to Baby Dwagons the previous night. Nothing about protection or anything else. No that was out of line on my part, and I am sorry for calling you a dumbass. However, I'm not lying, and I take exception to that. Ok, well I was told I sang to you. Thanks anyway.

I'M STILL HERE AND STILL TALKING NO, successful recipients are told they do something, which is different. There isn't a notification either way, even if they are targeted. IT IS POSSIBLE Mobley targeted Caladon. It is possible it was one of the scum and the result was lost amongst the excitement of scum night action results. It is also possible Mobley didn't use it, as he vocally thought it was useless. YOU CERTAINLY DON'T TRUST HYACINTH BUT... Myabe she claimed and was unable to follow through because the other scum needed her on something else. Maybe she missed the bit where recipients get a PM to say it was successful, so now there's an effort to throw that shade onto me. If you didn't get a notification from on high that you bathed the dwagons, then you didn't bathe the dwagons, but that would assume anything you say is true. @Omrom dear, sweet, adowable dwagon, did I sing you a lullaby on night one? Or maybe people would like to ask the Forest God questions themselves? OH AND, DID RUTHERFORD SAY YOUR fruit came with a side of Voyeurism or Protection or something? Because in that case they serve very different purposes.

Fair enough; I went back to look, and you were the first one to post and say you protected me. I wouldn't be difficult for an evil bunny to come along and say "oh yeah, I totally protected her too" especially knowing the scum had turned off all the investigative roles and that the rolewatcher had already claimed to watch Mobley. I'm not saying you're complicit in that, just for the record. What fits? Yeah you sound so, so sad BECAUSE I TOLD YOU ALL I DID YESTERDAY WITH THE LULLABY AND THAT WAS MY POINT, NOBODY WOULD WANT TO KEEP THEIR PM SAYING THEY GAVE A BATH TO THE DWAGONS UNDER WRAPS, SO NOBODY HAS, AND HYACINTH DIDN'T USE HER ACTION BECAUSE SHE WAS BUSY SETTING BOMBS. OR BLOCKING.

OH FFS YEAH I DID, BECAUSE I GOT A PM FROM THE HOST TELLING ME I DID. NO DUMBASS, I WAS GIVEN THE ROLE OF SINGING A LULLABY TO THE BABY DWAGONS, SO I DID. IT IS CONSISTENT WITH ME BEING GIVEN THE ROLE. It's hard to paraphrase a short (and unexpected) night action result, but it essentially said words to the effect of: You sang a lullaby to a baby dragon last night, except it was in baby dwagon speak, so wuwwaby and dwagon. @Corrina Cow, is there anything you can share from your role PM for Day/Night One that might clear up this craziness? BASED ON what?? Wishful thinking? I don't like how you and Bartosz are lining up to get rid of me, especially with soft support from Parvani. Why are none of you all that bothered about Hyacinth? Or are you trying to lay groundwork for her to be able to say "well of course I used that action and the reason nobody will confirm it is because we have all now agreed that people don't get a PM from the host with Baby Dwagon actions." EXCEPT FOR THE FACT THAT WE DO GET A PM FROM THE HOST, BECAUSE I DID.

OH YEAH OH YEAH OH FFS LEATHER DADDY BULLDOG HAS HEAD STUCK IN PAIL SERIOUSLY Bartosz, you seem to be determined to find me suspicious of something. First it's of being the Trickster, and now it's of being scum. To quote our resident Guard Captain (AND HOLBROOK THANK YOU FOR POSTING THIS MEME SO IT'S TO HAND): IS IT BECAUSE Bixby said she protected me? Maybe she did, maybe she didn't, who knows? Maybe if she actually did then she did so because she thought the role watcher might target me? Maybe she protected someone else and thought she'd look more town by saying she protected me? MAYBE SHE DID SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT? Only her scum buddies will have an insight into that. Seriously dude, wtf. ABSOLUTELY NOTHING unless you love WIFOM. WHY WOULD THE scum turn off all the informative roles if the scum HAD most or all the informartive roles? They might have had one and just not wanted to risk the others being used against them, but it would be strange if they'd had most of them. RETURNING TO YOUR MILD suspicion: THANK YOU FOR protecting me, especially if Emeric blows up tomorrow night. Although I don't want Emeric or anyone else to blow up tomorrow night. I didn't have the rolewatcher role ond Day One, so I'm not clear of what you're trying to accuse me of now. Since people were asking about choice of targets, now seems a good time to discuss mine. I was going to either track Hyacinth or Rutherford, and I chose Rutherford on balance (that guy everyone thought was the trickster up until a few hours ago, remember?) because Hyacinth should have been able to confirm herself by giving out her Baby Dwagon Baf. Speaking of which..... No mention on whether you were successful, or who you gave the Bath action to? Are you waiting to see how the night actions were reported? We already have two people who were apparently blocked, so you must have given it to somebody, right? But nobody has said they've received it.

OH YEAH OH YEAH OH YEAHHHHH BABY!!! LAST NIGHT I tracked Rutherford Raccoon, and I doubt anyone will be surprised that he targeted Bixby Bunny. Nice choice Rutherford, and congrats on your wings!

OH YEAH OH YEAH OH YEAH IT'S NIGHT TIME AND ALL IS PEACEFUL AND QUIET AND EVERYONE'S HOLDING HANDS AND ENJOYING THE SPOOKY PEACEFULNESS AND QUIETNESS! ENJOY THE PEACEFUL QUIETNESS EVERYBODY!! Those baby dwagons are so goddamn cute.

OH YEAH OH YEAH OH YEAH EVERYBODY'S TALKING ABOUT HOW NOBODYS TALKING YOUR THEORIES are interesting and make sense. Genuine question, though, how should it have been reported with a rolestopper targeting a mirror? No salt, I'm just asking because I'd assumed it would work how the trash panda reported it, so if it doesn't then that's a new perspective for me. Kinda feel bad about the whole "leather" thing now. IT'S ODD YOU have this list of people you suspect based on their roles but you don't include Leatrix and her unsuccessful watching, Hyacinth and her weird normalizing of Corrina (BECAUSE SHE DIDN'T WANT TO WASTE IT), and Marlowe and Rutherford's apparently mirror reflected roles (and let's not forget your unsuccessful tracking) yet you somehow include me for claiming the role everyone said should be claimed. BORF yourself TO SPEAK TO YOUR first point, Mobley was apparently role-watched by Franczeska who saw Mobley having the vig kill action used on him, indicating that the kill Gilford confessed to was indeed the vig kill, but yes I agree with your second point that just having the vig role doesn't make him town, and that on balance he is more likely to be due to the bus driving poodle. I CAN VERY MUCH see the logic in this, or at least most of it until the names got a bit screwy. I assume you mean "Both Parvani and Gilford made their claims...." and by Frankie you mean Franczeska I didn't get that straight away. AN INTERESTING ADDITION to Corrina's theories and certainly food for thought. WHY OH WHY OH WHY ARE YOU CLAIMING? WHAT POSSIBLE reason do you have? You want to make sure EVERYONE knows you have some harmless action, and it's apparently so the scum and the trickster can't claim it? Why not just PM someone you trust at the beginning of the night? Do you really think you might die and your claim will die with you? I think this is possibly the least helpful way of appearing helpful I have seen. I claimed yesterday because I was given the role after a bunch of people said the falsifier should claim. Claiming the way you are is either selfish or disingenuous. NO, THE PURPOSE of a townie is to eliminate all the threats to town, not hop about trying to be the towniest of town. Only scum need to worry about looking town. I think this hippo has a concussion. WHAT IS ALL this stuff about losing actions? Why are you all so certain about that when I thought that was discussed before all this and declared to not be a thing? I REALLY AM torn between wanting to vote for Hyacinth for her scumminess and her hippety hoppety fippety floppety, and also wanting to vote for Rutherford as there's been a good case made that he's the trickster. TO MY knowledge I've not seen the trickster try to kill anyone yet, so for now I'm going to vote for Hyacinth but I think a lynch of either would be helpful to us. If my vote is needed on Rutherfod, then I'll happily switch, but I won't be around for the very end of the day. VOTE: HYACINTH HIPPO

OH YEAH OH YEAH OH YEAH ELEPHANT AWAKE NOW BUT STILL LOOKS LIKE ELEPHANT! OK, THANKS FOR checking in. Planning on saying anything else? NO SALT. They did do you a favor and that's a good thing. I just didn't realize I said that out loud, because that's kinda my character quirk and how I ended up with these spray-on leather pants. Oh yeah baby, they hit the curves in all the right places and I'm doing it again aren't I? Goddamn it! They are ALL WELL AND GOOD as long as they are accurate (and inaccuracies have ALREADY BEEN demonstrated), and people don't mistake vomiting up abridged versions of events as some kind of helpful analysis when all it is is an exercise in editing. If you want the unfiltered version, read it for yourself.

OH YEAH OH YEAH OH YEAR EVERYONE WANTS TO BE AN ANALYST TODAY AND BABY DRAGONS HAVE ATTITUUUUUDE! NAH FAM that's not why, you're not reading. THAT was why. You mean all that COPYING of someone (BARTOSZ) else's list, or the ENDLESS asking people how they chose their target? It's not impossible they wanted it to look like you might be a vig kill (not knowing you had the vig action yourself), or thought you'd be the least likely to be protected. Anyway, they did you a favour. ARE YOU THE FORREST GOD? THE father of baby dragons? eewww WHOEVER YOU are we love you too. Not like that fam Vote: Extend the day or whatever makes it easier for you rly

OH DEAR OH DEAR OH DEAR! ITS SOMETHING OCLOCK IN THE MORNING AND ALL IS NOT WELL! But I look hot af in these slamming new pants and shirt! SO THAT EXPLAINS why I was told I sang a lullaby to a baby dwagon last night, so I can confirm you did what you said you did. You were clearly dreaming of my bitchin' new shirt. Firstly, thank you and secondly I don't think he would have lied considering he was town. Maybe it's what Corrina said about him not wanting to share an additional purpose. They got entertained, I SANG THE FIRST LULLABY THAT CAME TO MY HEAD AND IT JUST SO HAPPENED TO BE THE BEST LULLABY IN THE WORLD! If you're going to say Caladon was the vig and killed Mobley (and we know the vig killed Mobley unless Franczeska's lying), then the scum would still have been trying to kill Gilford even if that was some elaborate plan to kill Caladon. Would scum be able to give up a compulsory action like Busdriver in favor of killing? I think that's the only way it could really make sense, but Parvani seems genuine and it's a pretty far-fetched way of trying to confirm one of your own. THAT.. that actually makes sense. So some more information on the Falsifier role I had. I could target the Investigator and make it insane, the protector nd turn it into a bodyguard and the mirror to turn it into a deflector. Not particularly sinister roles apart from the insane investigator, but I didn't see any help in using the role, which is why I was happy to stay home. And sing to BABY DWAGONS as it turns out. Everyone seems to have claimed a role and some of them have even been verified (not to say the animal has, though) for instance I am happy enough to think that Corrina wasn't off murdering Caladon as she was busy forcing me to sing (that requires the not unusual assumption that scum can only use one night action at a time).

OH YEAH OH YEAH OH MY EARS AND WHISKERS THE MOUSE IS VERY SAD AND BIXBYS SHOWED UP NO WORD ON MISSING RACCOON So what? There was a lack of bears too. That wasn't the point I was making. Nobody here is a n00b, despite Mobleys whining that he didn't know what was going on and hadn't been on anything like this before. Yup, it's all recycled and second hand anyhow. CARE to ask nicely? It affects either the Investigator, the Protector or the Mirror. I'm not going to say how because the scum don't need to know everything. If I die you'll see I wasn't lying and wouldn't have used it, and if I don't and if you all still really need to know then I'll tell you tomorrow. IM SO GLAD YOUVE come around to everyone else's way of thinking after nearly everyone but the Goat and the Mouse said claiming anything other than Falsifier was a bad idea. Determined to defend the Mouse? Looks like he won't be lynched anyway rn.

Yes, I don't think any other CLAIMING would be a good idea. There was discussion earlier about the falsifier, and I appreciate you don't agree with claiming it, but I'd rather say now that I have it and I'm not going to use it than risk being killed and then either someone else claiming they had it or people trying to say I used it when I didn't. What the hell kinda bullshit is this? Thank you Marlowe, you know I find your interpretations most interesting!

OH YEAH OH YEAH OH WHAT THE HELL IT SEEMS CALADON CROCODILE IS VERY SENSITIVE TO NOISE SO WE MUST ALL BE VERY VERY QUITE AND NOT MAKE ANY NOISES SSHHHHHHH! AND I WAS IN A FASHION SHOW AND HAVE A NICE NEW TUNIC. IT'S GREEN! ISN'T IT GORGEOUS? I LIKED THE YELLOW ONE TOO BUT SSHHHHH! EMPHASIS mine. I am almost certain there aren't any ANIMALS here who haven't been on a boat at LEAST SIMILAR to this before. I don't think this is all that new. Second hand and recycled, really. NOT SURE I'm going to buy that you can't Englishly good when you can chat about the INTERROGATIVE, subjunctive and declarative. I'M BEARLY LITERATE MYSELF Yeah I'm proud of that joke but the the subjunctive refers to things that SHOULD HAPPEN, and perish the thought IT might not. I'M actually INCLINED TO believe you about the role YOU CLAIMED, as that was HOW I interpreted OMROM's response to me, but implying that OBVIOUSLY we were all going to claim and then blaming what you said on badly englishing when you SEEM TO KNOW a lot about it, well, that seems disingenuous to me. Never thought I'd vote for someone over grammar Vote: Mobley Mouse A TRUELY heartrendering tale that brings a TEAR to the eye. You are a close second for being voted for I doubt he's much bothered by that because it just doesn't seem like you're taking THIS seriously. Baby dragons ARE at risk Gilford! Some would SAY we have all been all ALONG. I have CONSIDERED whether or not to say anything, but I think it's better ON BALANCE to claim today. I WAS given the Falsifier role, but obviously I have no INTENTION of using it as it is definitely not compulsive.

OH YEAH OH YEAH OH YEAH IT'S ALL MADNESS ON THE SHIP! THER'ES SHARTING CUDDLING AND TRUNK LOVE!! I don't even know what that is, maybe it's fun? Only like most of them. Like whaaat? I think someone else said it, but even if they turn roles off, they still have to kill someone and the more they know the easier they can plan their actions. Do you and the mouse want everyone to claim? We can't be certain people will or won't get more than one action, and the scum might assume that if someone has one action they won't have another, so revealing who has a day action again helps the scum work out who has what. Knowing who had what role will be MUCH MORE important tomorrow. SORRY I MEANT, much more. I hope you're ok after you're accident! Clumsy hippo. I hope you don't get splinters in your ass from that fence you're sitting on!

THANK YOU Omrom, you are a HELPFUL and adorable fierce baby dragon! Green is such a relaxing color.

OH YEAH OH YEAH OH NO! BIDDYBORAXBIDDY IS DEAD! I didn't know Torgam the Mighty was such a pretty dragon. I don't think we're going to find these in any books, so can you tell us what these roles that you added do please Omrom?

OH YEAH OH YEAH OH YEAH! I AM THE oh I think I can stop shouting I am the TOWN CRYER, so apparently I'm LOUD and I cry? WE WILL RETURN THE BABY DRAGONS SAFELY HOME! I think maybe eggs for breakfast OH YEAH OH YEAH OH YEAH!