JintaiZ

@Duvors So you are following the bandwagon when the majority can't be reached without your vote, but you're not following the bandwagon if the majority is reached anyway? Strange behavior...

Same here.

Why exactly would they do that?

But then again, there are already a lot less scum than town, so they wouldn't want to not use their action.

The scum would have almost no advantages in this case. Why do they need to take it as a challenge? All they probably want is to win the game.

They're sealing their own fate by mentioning it. They probably guessed it correct on night one and nobody got killed the next day, so they just blocked the same player again.

Again, I don't think your theory makes any sense. That's not too likely, either.

@Kaanere Miss Pierce, do you mind giving us some other theories?

What activities?

This won't give scum any advantages.

I'm not sure what exactly is going on but there is no way scum will be sitting out for three night straight. I'm going to quote: I said this before but scum can always evaluate the crew on the next day. The theory that they were drunk is just a complete joke. Vote: Vivian Pierce (Kaanere)

Miss Pierce, I'm not sure if your theory makes sense... If the traitors know who's on their team, why don't they start by killing random townies? Maybe you could clarify?

I don't think the scum will wait for three nights straight.

I'm assuming the supposed blocker successfully blocked the killer on night one, then targeted the same player on night two and night three.

I'm just going to take an extra step and get the majority reached: Vote: Spencer Milford (KotZ) Separate post: Sorry, forgot to unvote... Unvote: Vivian Pierce (Kaanere)

I think it should be 16 hours and 20 minutes if my math is correct?

Vote: Vivian Pierce (Kaanere) For two reasons: I can't believe there's only 18 hours left and she's still not commenting. Again, inactivity itself is not an issue but it's starting to look like she's purposely trying to avoid discussions. I've said it before, bur scum will never sit out.

Unvote: Put your name in your signature! (KotZ) I need some time to rethink. I can see where you are coming from, but it looks like he's really trying hard to defend Vivian...

Good point, but I don't think that's what killed Wembley. I (and most other members) voted for him because he was unhelpful and sarcastic.

@Kaanere Miss Pierce, it'd be nice to hear from you.

To be honest, I'm a bit annoyed that Milford is blaming me and Lawson when he was the one who sealed the fate of Wembley. I think most of us can agree that we needed a lynch, but then don't put the blame on anyone if that person turns out to be town! Therefore... Vote: Put your name in your signature! (KotZ)

Fair enough, but she's not adding any real value to discussions.

Vivian said: I marked the things I find interesting with bold. Why would the scum sit out all night? Killing just about anyone would help them. They don't need time to evaluate the crew. They can just kill a random townie and it will still help. This makes me think that Vivian was probably blocked and could not perform the kill. Not voting yet, I need some time to think.

Observations: The result was somewhat surprising given the way Wembley acted, but it's still quite unfortunate (like I mentioned above). I was a bit confused about Wallace not following the bandwagon at first, but now I can see why he did that. Vivian continues to be suspicious for me, especially since she said "the scum sat the night out for some reason." That is downright impossible, and killing just about anyone would help the scum. Vivian didn't provide any reasons other than "following the bandwagon" when she placed her vote on Wembley. That just makes her even more suspicious.

Indeed, very unfortunate that we have lost a loyal pirate. I still don't understand why he chose not to share the results of the investigation if he would have been lynched anyway...