Marwyyn

Which is why one shouldn't pass on a scroll unless the role is more likely to benefit town than scum depending on the scenario. (Unless of course the scroll holder is scum in which case you do you I guess).

If someone fakeclaims sending a scroll (for whatever dumb reason), then the person who actually did send the scroll will obviously know they're lying.

Yeah and so is voting. What are we thinking? Lynch? No lynch? C'mon I wanna hear opinions, thoughts, commentary, recipes. Gimme it all. Wait I'm pretty sure it doesn't say anything about the scroll getting passed to other people. Either it goes straight to Traveler or it doesn't right?

Let's all remember that there could be a Gorgon Traitor who didn't get recalled. So something like the above post could be a Traitor trying to single to the other scum by acting overly scummy. I meant to say "quoted post" not "above post".

In the beginning? Yeah. Sure. Why not. Towards the end? No. Nah. Uh-uh. To much chaos when one wrong move could mean game over. Also can he choose not to submit a action?

Odd. Just...odd.

Or maybe it becomes void and a new random player is given a new scroll on the next day? That or they just stack up I guess. I mean maybe in the beginning an extra role could be helpful, but towards the end, it could throw a sea-monkey wrench into a town block's plans, unless it's a ability that can do no harm like a protector role. But hey, even that could do harm if we have for example a vigilante. Now if the Traveler was in the town block that could be a different story, but we don't know what their win condition is, so they couldn't be fully brought in.

I'd gladly do the honors by hammering a chisel into their head.

Yay, Pew Pew.

Right, well I'm going to go build a commemorative statue of our fallen King while we wait.

Oh no! The King is dead! We'll get to the bottom of this!