Vicont45

No, you did not understand me correctly. I also had in mind 3-way-gearbox. In position "Left tooth Down" works only Drive the movement, while functions to controlled by the "Right Tooth" is not active. In position "Left tooth Up" Drive the movement is not active, but works the functions "Right Tooth" (crane and outriggers) Yes, it is quite likely. Because in the Unimog 1 motor drives the 3 functions, and in the 42070 - 2 motors drives the 6 functions. All converges.

Yes, I agree with you that the "right tooth up position" to controls the turning of the crane AND the winch up and down. Offer my version of the functional on image:

I agree with you that the successor of the Porsche will not be 1 year right behind it, but not the fact that it will be in 2018. It is very likely that it will be 2019 or 2020. I agree. This trend is pleased. I would like, that similar combine from several sets was more and in the future.

Yes I agree. It looks like a real three-stage gearbox. Overall, I liked the idea to combine a 3-set - it brings more variety. But this processor looks like something small. Take a look at the number of parts of three sets: - 42057 = 199 pieces; - 42061 = 260 pieces; - 42063 = 603 pieces; Total 1062 pieces (it is a not bad quantity) In appearance harvester consists of about 500-600 pieces. It means that a lot of pieces is not of used. IMHO, this reminds combine dial 42048, an improved version, they differ in that: - Added 1 step in the gearbox; - Added to the suspension on the rear axle; - Added 3 cylinder engine; - Added vintelyator on the engine; - Added 1 seat for the passenger; Except for the suspension, the differences compared with the 42048 is not very principled. In principle, it combines several sets - it's a good idea, but I would like to combine was more technically complicated and more functional.

Judging by the frame of the video, in the front grille a used piece # 4562009: Rack 7 M x 4.

It is illogical explanation. Because these are different market segments with different target audience, and they should not affect each other. For example, the entire range of LEGO, I'm interested only in series "Technic", while the other series me do not care.

I think that Lego have reached your limit, releasing 8 models in the 1st half. Is 11 models for 1 year - it is not enough?

It is a pity that this is still "2 in 1" rather than pneumatic ...