KimT

I was trying to make a joke on the Ahsoka sigfig thingy. Sorry if it came out harsh.

Your point being?

Could it be because they're scans of retailer catalogues? What did you expect?

Wow those magazines you guys are doing are really great I've already downloaded the English version and I'm truly impressed with the layout and high quality of the articles. Thanks for making them available

This kind of experince would do good in one of the reviews on this set. I'll merge this into a review shortly.

Best of luck with your entry.

No need to go further than the bucket Worst set ever. It was poorly designed and the idea of making a Star Wars Bucket a lá the basic brick buckets was a bad idea.

Hmmm.... Not sure what to think of this. First of all let me say; Thank you for putting up a list of all the species made into LEGO And to all you enthusiastic members trying to help improve this index - good job. Those of you who think this is an odd topic, just stay away from it. Noone's forcing you to post and a good old saying is: "If you got nothing to say- then shut up!" I am sorry that you think you've grown accustom to rudeness on this board, that's not one of our goals around here. If you guys think pictures would be great, heck then why don't you find those pics and post them here? It's always easy saying what one think needs improvement, but not really doing anything for it. Deeplink them here and the thread maker can consider wether or not to post those pics in the initial post. "Stay on Target!" And who even cares wether or not Ahsokadeahgwua is spelled right? Rancor has NEVER been made in LEGO - read the topic please Tusken or Tusken Raider doesn't really matter, does it? We all know what he means.

That's because you'll have to click the picture twice and end up with this in your web url: http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Legoroni/F430TargaTop/dscf0707.jpg Which you then copy and paste into the img tags like this: [img=http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Legoroni/F430TargaTop/dscf0707.jpg] And tadaaa! You'll have this: Nice MOC

Yes and wrong topic. That belongs in the "Star Wars sets anyone?"-topic which is on availability and such.

30004 Battle Droid on STAP - click the picture for the review. Or click here for another review of this one

Nope, but he sure is throwing stones as he's leaving Dammit...

Wohoooo! New background picture. Great photo and very funny caption

Bear in mind people that these are preliminary and will probably change to some extent.

That is exactly what I asked people not to post like. That is NOT keeping this argumentative.

Wisely put. Yes anyone may enter the MOC Index Raffle on the Chrome Darth Vader and everyone may enter the Battle Pack Contest. Be aware though, that I'll be checking every single entry and if I find any double accounts or stuff like that - I'll ban the members with no prior warning.

Hmmm... I actually like the Grievous minifig and I believe that the conversion from movie to LEGO version is perfect. Ah well, we can't agree on everything

Ease up on the amount of smilies please.

Please read the rules All you have to do is take a picture with the entire set the same way they're usually displayed on the boxes.

No worries Oky. Anything I can get my hands on will be used for contests. How do you think the 66308 ended up here?

What do you think?

The Sith Infiltrator may be poorly designed, but consider how old it is and compare to other LEGO sets from that peroid and I'll say that it's quite good. Not a set I'd buy today, but back then - hellyeah!

Ok, the next one to vote anything but the 10198 Tantive IV / Rebel Blockade Runner will get the hammer. Definately

Indeed it is. Thanks for capturing those pics for us Jesper. No topic is ever over I wish they'd done this one for us.

Consider this a warning. We'll not allow ranting topics around here. But if this stays argumentative and sober, then we're willing to let it live. And I really don't think he meant Exo-Force figs. This is solely for Star Wars sets and figs. Pedro gave a good intro on how and what to post. Let's keep it that way. Or else I'll have to call the