Eurobricks Vassals
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Kuramapika1

Spam Prevention

  • What is favorite LEGO theme? (we need this info to prevent spam)
  • Which LEGO set did you recently purchase or build?

Profile Information

  • Gender


  • Country

Recent Profile Visitors

378 profile views
  1. @Stephan: as @The Mugbearersay it is a colition problem; see these pic: 44358; so it needed to be corrected.
  2. Someone have troubles using the aliases to find the parts? I can't do that.
  3. The problem is in the part 2454. Five minutes ago, I use another part (mesh) with the number 46212 and it allow me to use it. Somehow, part 2454 retains some unknown info on the .g file.
  4. It changed to 2454 automatically.
  5. @Stephan: I downloaded the files and haven't any problem with them.
  6. I checked the part 39739 problem and the issue is the connectivity: it slightly misaligned and needed to be moved to the corner. Hope it helps.
  7. @M2m: I don't know if you checked these page, it have the size of triceratops. These one have pics with plates around. Hope it helps.
  8. I'll try it. I just use the 2x+1 (deduced of the official outer cables in where x=long of cable), i.e.: O.C. 3L have seven flex points. So in my case the flex cable 33L have 67 flex points.
  9. @Stephan: about my parts, release what you consider to be released. I did little progress with the flex cables, specialy the 33L; I need to rework it entirely (move the flex bones to show in Brick Studio).
  10. In order to avoid any conflict, I changed the part 2699 for 664201. So I do this with the intention to no highjack any number again. And I updated the link in where the flex parts are adding the part 664201, the assembly folder with part 6642 and the .g files that I missed to include. Also I changed the word colition to outlines (this is the correct one) in the edit line. My apologise to many changes. I hope it works fine.
  11. @SylvainLSwhat you say it is true as long as you use the Ldraw individual parts of a composite one. But you can made a part using their subparts without combining the individual pieces, example part 2698: using LDPE, you can create the whole part and then assign the number and (in the header) add the info clarifying the purpose of the file, i. e: conversion to LDD, that include the necessary sub part, etc. In this way you leave free the numbers in LDD to be used in other parts.
  12. @Stephan: Here is the improvements and new parts: Part 2901 All flex cables Part 6642: solved problem with right "gate"; I created it and asigned number 2699 since it not be in use (in Ldraw correspond to a subpart of the Technic Action Figure) Add 6549.xml; forget to do the last time (the .g file is added, if you don't deleted it) Part 6272: I see no problems with the connectivity Part 32181: my part haven't any clipping on it On the toothed parts (2712, 2719, 2792, 4262, 4273 and 4442): aparently the problem is the connectivity; it seems that have "colitions" issiues and prevent proximity to each other, my solution: use two conectivity per toothed side per part, one shrinked a lot and the other not so to allow proximity. Part 41894: if you are talking of (sub)part 32496, it is no my design. I only use it in the assembly file. Finaly: almost all parts have outlines (that's why I add the same parts in a preview post) Tha's all for now; any problem tell me and I try to solve it. Have a good day.
  13. @Stephan I have finished the improvements and the flex cables (and add part 2901). Talking abaut the parts 2997 and 2998: I don't see why the needed of modifications on the tyres and rims because Bricklink and other couple of web pages say that. I'm true to official parts and there is no official sets that have these combinations. So please, I beg you, publish the parts 2997 & 2998 as I made. Thank you so much.
  14. @Stephan: I found the problem: it's in the part 6282.lxfml and 75815.lxfml. In they are the alias number line; delete it, save the file and load again. Maybe it works. By the way, witch side of part 6642 are you talking abaut, the upper or lower section (viewed from the top view, with x axis pointing to the right)?
  15. @Stephan thank for the info. Part 6272 I can do little to nothing but I'll try to correct it anyway. For part 6642 (and the other flex system connectors)... Well, I am making improvements on them since I'm creating the flex cables (and made it flexible) so I recommend to leave it as is. I mentioned the flex cables: wath numbers do you recommend to use since there are a lot of them? Because the official numbers are alphanumerics.