WorkDrone

[xenologer]

Because every Space Dock needs maintenance bots to do the dirty work.

Factory Link

Edit:

Larger pics when moderated,

thumbnails:

[Starwars4J]

I hope you don't take any offense to this, but the MOC is really "cute". I love it *wub*

Only thing is, maybe instead of two black droid arms total, have 4-6.

//\

|| |

like this^

[Kahgarak]

Wow,very simple and nicely designed.I like it.

[xenologer]

Thanks!

'cute' is no big surprise, because I was thinking of AlphaTeam DeepSea's TeeVee when I made this. :-D

also partly inspired by the ROV minisub from Ocean Odyssey; in fact I made a yellow underwater variation (in real bricks) as an assistant for my AquaRaiders before this Spacey one.

[Bonaparte]

I was thinking of AlphaTeam DeepSea's TeeVee when I made this. :-D

That was also what I was thinking about when I saw your MOC.

Lots of details for such a little MOC *y*

[zero1312]

Oh, *wub* *sweet* *wub* *sweet*

That's so cute!!!!!

[Asuka]

A very nice and useful robot vehicle!

[Brainbox]

Anyone see the resemblance?

Nice MOC. Like everyone else has said, it's cute. I get the impression that may not be a suitable quality of a worker drone. Oh well. *y*

[Starwars4J]

Anyone see the resemblance?

Nice MOC. Like everyone else has said, it's cute. I get the impression that may not be a suitable quality of a worker drone. Oh well. *y*

Hm, that second picture doesn't seem to be working. Anyway what about it do you think needs improvement?

[Brainbox]

Hm, that second picture doesn't seem to be working. Anyway what about it do you think needs improvement?

My second picture? It works for me.

I didn't mean that it needed improving, I meant that being 'cute' perhaps isn't a word that a worker drone would want to be described as. I like it as is.

[Starwars4J]

My second picture? It works for me.

I didn't mean that it needed improving, I meant that being 'cute' perhaps isn't a word that a worker drone would want to be described as. I like it as is.

Ah. As for the second picture all I see is a little square that says "www.TFU.info"

Does anyone else see it?

[Bonaparte]

Ah. As for the second picture all I see is a little square that says "www.TFU.info"

Does anyone else see it?

That's also what I see.

What are we supposed to see Mr. Brainbox?

[xenologer]

What are we supposed to see Mr. Brainbox?

Apparently the site his image is from doesn't allow remote linking.

But if you Cut+Paste this address in a new window it seems to work:

http://www.tfu.info/1985/Decepticon/Shrapnel/vehiclemode.jpg

[Starwars4J]

Apparently the site his image is from doesn't allow remote linking.

But if you Cut+Paste this address in a new window it seems to work:

http://www.tfu.info/1985/Decepticon/Shrapnel/vehiclemode.jpg

Nope, that just gives me a new window with the protection image again...

[Bonaparte]

Nope, that just gives me a new window with the protection image again...

I've solved the mystery. My Firefox gives the msg "The image http://www.tfu.info/protected.gif cannot be displayed, because it contains errors." (right click on the "www.TFU.info"-image --> Properties --> The alternate text contains this msg). But with IE it works. So I could finally see this mysterious image :-D

I converted it from .jpeg to .gif so all problems would be fixed and uploaded it to my BS:

[Starwars4J]

Ah! Thanks for the trouble, Bonaparte! I don't really see the resemblance, but it's nice to finally see this mystery picture :-P

[Bonaparte]

Ah! Thanks for the trouble, Bonaparte! I don't really see the resemblance, but it's nice to finally see this mystery picture :-P

It was no trouble at all.

But I also don't see much resemblance. It must be the "arms" :-D .

[zero1312]

I think he was refering to the arms and the bulkiness of the body. :-/

[Brainbox]

I think he was refering to the arms and the bulkiness of the body. :-/

Yes, that's correct. I was just reminded of Shrapnel by the bug look. I kind of wish I hadn't bothered now... ;-)

[iamded]

Hehe, that's cool. A nice little worker bot. Awesome. :-D