SearchFunction Posted January 28, 2021 Posted January 28, 2021 Piece #18677 together with crossaxles and tubes could potentially be used for an easy bridge connection. I don't have any of the new parts, I was just fooling around in LDD. It does leave some studs, but its a quick fix. No need to make a connection in the bottom. Thoughts? Bridge idea by SearchFunction, on Flickr Quote
Stuartn Posted January 28, 2021 Posted January 28, 2021 That looks quite good. Frankly, I don't care if there are some studs, it is better to sacrifice that than to not have a gentle and clean curve, which you've achieved. I like the use of the tube pieces to fill in the gaps. Quote
koalayummies Posted January 28, 2021 Posted January 28, 2021 Yeah that looks good! I agree with Stuartn, some exposed studs aren't a deal-breaker but if they are you could use the inverse piece and reinforce from the bottom but it might restrict the angles you can achieve. Still what you've got here is great. Quote
moparacker Posted January 28, 2021 Posted January 28, 2021 (edited) Great idea SearchFunction. I expanded on it some with the suggestion koalayummies gave using the 11458 part and capping the axles with a cross axle extension, but with all of the piece in black to mimic expansion joints used on bridges. Edited January 28, 2021 by moparacker Fixing the image as there's no "preview" feature. Quote
SearchFunction Posted January 28, 2021 Author Posted January 28, 2021 I looked a bit closer at it again. Unfortunately I don't think the inverse piece will allow travel in the downwards direction when placed underneath. But I realise that you really only need 4 connectors, not 8, so thats even less studs. The tube I used dosn't exist in DBG, but there are plenty of other options like moparacker mentions. Quote
moparacker Posted January 28, 2021 Posted January 28, 2021 Yup, good call on the interference with the inverse piece. I spaced checking that on the build. Moving the hinge assembly down one plate will leave an odd gap with the inverse piece. I had initially tried with the 18677 two plates lower, but that leaves an unsightly gap and slight height difference between the road surfaces. Quote
SearchFunction Posted January 28, 2021 Author Posted January 28, 2021 Not as bad as I thought. Bridge with 2021 roadplates render by SearchFunction, on Flickr I suppose one could just use regular 3938 hinges. It dosn't give a smooth gap, but its a lot less noticeable. Quote
jpx Posted January 28, 2021 Posted January 28, 2021 What a great idea! I've just tried it (I don't have many grey technic round things...): Only thing is, where the sloping road (?) meets the cross-walk/zebra stribes, you can't have the 18677, since its just a bit more than 2 plates 'high'. But using 48336 and 60470b and a few tiles, made it look good :) Quote
danimarroquin Posted January 29, 2021 Posted January 29, 2021 (edited) Love this new road plates , the have so many uses for them . Edited January 29, 2021 by danimarroquin Quote
SearchFunction Posted January 29, 2021 Author Posted January 29, 2021 21 hours ago, jpx said: What a great idea! I've just tried it (I don't have many grey technic round things...): Only thing is, where the sloping road (?) meets the cross-walk/zebra stribes, you can't have the 18677, since its just a bit more than 2 plates 'high'. But using 48336 and 60470b and a few tiles, made it look good :) Cool! You don't need to connect it at the bottom though. You can just slide it up to the edge. Hmm OR I guess it would have to be connected through the white plate sticking out running along the surface and connecting to the pillar. Quote
Dazzzy Posted January 29, 2021 Posted January 29, 2021 It's a cool idea for the new road system, and the studs that are there doesn't spoil it as they're minimal really. The inverted pieces work pretty well the other way, if you want to do a draw bridge/lifting bridge. (did this digital build for a contest a couple of years ago) Quote
koalayummies Posted January 29, 2021 Posted January 29, 2021 @Dazzzy that is a beautiful bridge! OP: here's another possible stud-less solution using 49307 in the gap, smooth for cars driving over it but it has a bit of a jagged look from the side: Quote
SearchFunction Posted January 29, 2021 Author Posted January 29, 2021 I agree, that is one beautifull bridge Dazzzy. I havn't seen that part before koalayummies. That is also a nice solution. I wonder if maybe technic beams could be used also? Hmm gonna do some experimenting! Quote
SearchFunction Posted January 29, 2021 Author Posted January 29, 2021 I think I got it. However this is now a complicated 45 piece solution, so like the opposite of what I wanted , but I'm sure It can be done simpler by someone smarter than me. The key piece is #45590 which is a technic rubber piece (?!) which due to its "8" shape will allow the roadplate to bend a lot more when used in an L shape construction to be mounted beneath the plates: Bridge connection, 2nd try by SearchFunction, on Flickr Bridge connection, 2nd try by SearchFunction, on Flickr Quote
Vilhelm22 Posted January 30, 2021 Posted January 30, 2021 Very nice! I wonder if LEGO themselves will ever come out with something of this kind..... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.