This post has been edited by LEGOMAN132: 12 December 2009 - 05:58 AM
2010 Train Sets Now w/ high res image links: 5/6/2010
#17
Posted 12 December 2009 - 03:54 AM
The Green Brick Giant, on Dec 12 2009, 10:44 AM, said:
LEGOMAN132, on Dec 12 2009, 11:38 AM, said:
In Cpt. Zuloo's interview with Jamie Berard (I hope I got that somewhere right working from memory) the designer of Emerald Night, he ruled out any more cars for it. He also said it was unlikely single cars would be sold in the forseeable future because their sales have been poor in the past.
#18
Posted 12 December 2009 - 04:25 AM
This post has been edited by Legoliner Pilot: 12 December 2009 - 04:26 AM
-

#19
Posted 12 December 2009 - 04:27 AM
Legoliner Pilot, on Dec 11 2009, 06:54 AM, said:
Yea I agree here. The Metroliner has IMO the best interior for any LEGO passenger train made. It had, snack bar, sleeping area, toliet and sink, cargo area, engine room, seating, and Driver area of course. Basically everything that a real life train has.
This wasn't hard to accomplish either, no new molds or special building techniques developed.
Now all they have as an interior are seats and tables and if we are lucky they have storage for suitcases
I also agree with Holodoc and what is the Power source. If they make PF, will they include all the motor parts? Will they include track?
They are called Cargo and Passenger Train not Engine. The EN is listed on LEGO.com as an Engine.
Or will they still have the parts available separately which would be

Brickshelf Gallery Bricklink Store
My Latest Review: 7641 City Corner
Are you a train fan? Let us know about it in the Train Tech Registry !!
-Macoco
#20
Posted 12 December 2009 - 04:48 AM
Legoliner Pilot, on Dec 12 2009, 03:25 PM, said:
Yes, that's correct a level crossing is where the train line crosses a road at the same level. I haven't bought one since the 4.5V blue track era, so I'm also interested to see what its like.
#21
Posted 12 December 2009 - 12:03 PM
Quote
for this. Unfotruantely it is not feasible and TLG doesn't seem to have any such
plans in the near future. Train is like an adult-only series, especially those
individual cars. They don't allocate too much resources for somethign that doesn't
have a comeback. They had to drop another exclusive model just to bring out Emerald
Night this year. Fans asked for seperate cars and this would mean they'd have
to drop out anotehr exclusive for that. Imagine not having Medieval Market Village
just for the sake of a train car, that wouldn't make sense sales-wise. Train
is not an evergreen theme and it's either in the City theme or exclusives. City
has its internal things and trains can't take all the space and those models
do not satisfy adults anyway. As for exclusives, liek I have mentioned, there
are betetr things to produce. So train is like a stepchild If you want to
see more of it, you have to buy more of it. So that they'll invest more.
That's what we've been told. Sorry to hurt your feelings, I lvoe trains too.
#22
Posted 12 December 2009 - 12:32 PM
Quote
Unfortunately we won’t be releasing any more wagons for the Emerald Night but that’s not to say there future trains won’t have wagons, but traditionally they haven’t done as well. Many fans say that they buy 5 or 6 wagons for every train, but it hasn’t shown that way in our sales numbers. So it has to be a very specific, very appealing wagon to be able to be on its own. Otherwise we have to think of a more creative way to offer it. So I wouldn’t say there is no potential of wagons in the future but at this time we would have to use one of our… basically every year there will be a specific number of sets and each set is given an article number, for example in the Lego Exclusive last year we launched 6 or 7 items. So you could say, ‘Okay you can have the wagon or Medieval Market, or the wagon or the Rebel Blockade Runner’, so when you only have a limited number of sets and you look at the potential and decided will people as a whole buy more and be more excited about something like the Medieval Market or a train and then another train wagon. It just takes away the potential to launch another item like the new Pirate Ship that is coming out; you could argue why couldn’t that be a new train wagon? In then end we can always make those decisions, we have an article number but when you have so few, it’s hard to justify doing a wagon when traditionally the sales of wagons have not been so strong.
#23
Posted 12 December 2009 - 12:34 PM
Thanks for the info.
Quick Links: My introduction topic - My first sets - My LDD MOCs. My Brickset: Have list - Want list.
#24
Posted 12 December 2009 - 06:15 PM
We have to buy more Emerald Night sets:
- add the carriages to the engine
- turn the remaining engine parts into something else
At least we're not forced to buy a motor and battery with each Emerald Night - therefore it is feasible to buy more sets without making more engines.
Green tanker anyone?
The question is, would TLG make more EN sets if we bought the lot sooner than they expected? If not, could we petition for there to be one AFOL exclusive train set per year or two, while-ever we bought them?
The recommendation for the RC train sets, on the TLG website, is to add no more than 2 carriages to the ICE train and no more than 4 wagons to the goods train. This indicates that TLG don't design trains to have a lot of wagons. They couldn't pull them if they sold them. At least the train power and market policies are consistent! TLG is no longer in the ready-to-run train market.
We just have to be creative ourselves - that's what it's all about! I think this century MOC trains are the best anyway. Mine are here.
I'm working on hybrid trains, to make PF and 9V trains sit more easily alongside each other. We have to be creative with the electrics too!
Mark
#25
Posted 12 December 2009 - 06:33 PM
My problem with Emerald Night is that it isn't a train! It's half a train that cost $100 and will cost $250 to make half a train run! That's just insane. LEGO now admits that the Train theme is for adults, then why did they get rid of 9V Trains? Does LEGO even think before they do something?
#26
Posted 12 December 2009 - 07:08 PM
The Green Brick Giant, on Dec 12 2009, 08:33 PM, said:
If I remember right, it all started with a broken mold for the 9V tracks. It turned out to be too expensive to replace it and keep producing old rails. They switched to all plastic ones for cheaper sets.
#27
Posted 12 December 2009 - 07:40 PM
cagri, on Dec 12 2009, 02:08 PM, said:
But that's just a LEGO lie.
The tracks are cheaper now because there are no metal pieces, however the mold is the same. Plus it's not any cheaper when it's still $16 for 8 pieces of straight track. Nothing became cheaper, all LEGO did was piss off AFOLs, and chrildren can't afford the trains.
#28
Posted 13 December 2009 - 02:53 AM
I could of course build my own coaches and this has crossed my mind. Unfortunately the rarest parts used for the coach, such as the windows, aren't available on DesignbyMe in the more common colours, let alone
#29
Posted 13 December 2009 - 04:08 AM
#30
Posted 13 December 2009 - 12:40 PM
It's the retailers, who insist on never purchasing ANY train sets or wagons - many people would buy them because there isn't any other MOVING item in the City range (i.e. moves on it's own).
It doesn't help that Lego left the train line to rot like old wagons, then blame US (not the country) for poor sales! Look at the 1991 era - plenty of seperate wagons, track etc. to keep adults and child alike buying to expand their collection - "We can buy Timmy a train set for christmas and then he can buy extra wagons or track when he wants - and we can buy him them for his birthday too". Not any more.
Lego needs to realise that AFOLs WILL buy the 'kiddies' sets - because they SHOULD be cheap enough for us to buy, then customise. That's what being a AFOL is partly about - buying a set then detailing it/tweaking it so it'll look/perform better.

Sign In
Register
Help
Add Reply
Top
MultiQuote













