Kendall Odell

Vote: End day early

So he's claiming tracker? We know Benjamin targeted him on Night 1 so unless someone blocked Ben then his action wouldn't have gone though anyway? At least I think that's how that would work. Sorry just saw this message. If he was watcher and targeted you then surely the bus driver targeting you mean he would've gotten results for Ansel? But yeah he's definitely lying.

What are these said night actions?

You'd have to be pretty unlucky to be the target of an insane investigator via a redirect. As far as the jailkeeper claims go. I think there’s definitely been a mix up somewhere. Either in communication of a role from player to player or understanding of the role from the host.

*bang* *bang* *bang* Inventor sounds very likely. We’ve had a couple of those in the last few games. So we know that: Benjamin is a town blocker. He blocked Louis on Night 1 and Myself last night (night 2) Someone blocked Liam last night (possibly one of the two alleged jail keepers?) *clang* *bash* *bash*

Unvote: Arthur Hargraves Vote: Louis Townsend

I’ll concur. It’s not a great defence. Day One is always random, baseless votes. Regardless I can assure you you’re barking up the wrong tree with me. I’m town and everything I’ve done so far has been in the interests of it. True. But I’ve learned never to assume anything. However improbable. But I agree with you here. I’m leaning slightly more Town with Warren despite his role claim post not making sense in many areas.

*bash* *bash* *bash* *clang* It was the third vote of the day. I wouldn’t call that hiding since others just waited for a bandwagon to start and pile on. Indeed, and a bodyguard can be any alignment so a cop investigation would be the decider. *clang* *clang* *clang*

*bang* *bang* *clash* *clash* I can see how it looks scummy. I think it’s better to place a vote than to sit on the fence and not hold a position at all. Which is why I went for Paul. I also voted for Paul on Day One. Would scum vote for each other on Day 1? If I was scum why would I actively call out a team mate so early? Why would I call out a teammate for being too quiet and risk drawing attention to him? I agree with your position on Zachary. I’m going to Vote: Arthur Hargrove. Looking back at yesterday. He makes short, sometimes fluffy, posts which don’t actually say anything at all. But make it look like he’s adding to the discussion. I don’t know who’s been involved behind the scenes. But from what Uve seen in the day thread Arthur hasn’t contributed much. *bash* *bash* *bash*

*bash* *bash* *bash* My point about the bandwagon happening so quickly was that it was a lot of people jus saying Vote: Paul. With no real reasoning. It’s not the fact it was for Paul that was the problem. More the fact that it was so sudden. I voted for Paul because he didn’t respond to anything. And I wanted to make sure no one would backtrack on the lynch. *bash* *bash* *bash*

*bang* *bang* *bang* Whoo! We caught one! Sad to see my trumpet buddy Robert go. Possibly. Bodyguard is a hard role to prove. Since as you said the only way we know if he’s telling the truth is if he turns up dead. Warren was asked a lot of questions regarding his claim but didn’t answer any of them. *bang* *bang* *bang*

*clang* *bash* *bash* *clang* *clang* Oi! I’ll have you know the crew love my drum solos. *bash* *bash* *clang* *bash* *clang*

I didn’t mean seal as such more guarantee the Lynch. So if someone was to unvote/backtrack at the last minute we would still have enough votes to secure the lynch.

*clash* *clash* Just to seal the lynch vote: Paul Lapointe. Paul has done nothing to defend himself here. If he comes out with something amazing I’d reconsider. *bash* *bash*

*clang* *clang* *clang* Isn’t this the role of a normal bodyguard anyway? What? How would you using your actions cause a confusion when analysing voting trends? This makes no sense. And the Bus Driver would have known Ethan was intended to be killed because he switched him with Ansel. And I presume he would have told Ethan all of this. I don’t like the way the bandwagon has suddenly amassed onto Paul like this. Why do you think this? *clang* *bash* *bash*

*bang* *bang* *bang* I think you’re reading into what I said too much. When I said that I “noticed that as well”. I wasn’t trying to make it out like Zachary had made some great point or anything. The point I was making was that I noticed that there was a long gap between Morgan’s initial post and his defence. Which was (likely) down to scurvy issues. I quoted the wrong person there. The scum are the informed majority. So they would be aware of who is town. But Robert has a point as they may not be aware of who their teammates are. *bang* *bang* *bang*

*bash* *clash* *bang* I don’t know. A bus driver claim would be pretty hard to maintain in the long run. Especially with more night actions results giving us a clearer picture of who is doing what. The only advantage it has is causing confusion I guess. I did notice that as well. But then Morgan has been silent today so who knows? *bash* *bash* *bash*

*bash* *bash* *bash* Whoa, lots as happened since I was last here. So to my understanding, Ethan has been approached by a Bus Driver telling him that he directed the night action aimed for Ethan at Ansel hence why Ansel was killed during the night. Role madness is possible but we can’t just assume it simply because a previous voyage was. *bash* *bash* *bash*

*bash* *bash* *bash* I agree. It’s unlikely a Vig would strike on Night 1 and potentially take out a another town player. They’d wait until later in the journey until they had more evidence. Good catch. William did contradict himself there. Voting for someone else but then agreeing with said person on the next line about a lynch candidate he hasn’t even voted for. *bash* *bash* *bash*

*bash* *bash* *bash* I’ve seen this kind of thing in the past. “Look at me, I didn’t vote for the town player therefore I’m definitely not scum!”. I’m interested to know, who do you find suspicious? Who do you think might be scum? This sitting on the fence attitude isn’t helping. *bash* bash* *bash* This vote from yesterday pings me a little. We had 7 pages worth of discussion and all William can say is that he finds Ethan chaotic. He also agrees that Reginald should speak up and say something about his suspicions but chooses to stay off the bandwagon. Are his scum mates also on the bandwagon? Is that why he deliberately chose to stay off and not vote for Reginald? I could be grasping at nothing hear.

We can play some music *bash* *bash* *clash* *bash* *clash*

*bash* *bash* *bash* Now that Morgan has come forward and explained himself it might be better to look elsewhere. As I’ve said before. I think a lynch is important for Day One (or just in general). I don’t like William and Zachary’s pop in popular out attitude but I don’t see any point in trying to get them to talk. Truthfully I didn’t like Reginald’s vote on me as I’ve explained before. In the interest of a lynch I will: Unvote: Morgan Marchand Vote: Reginald Aston *bash* *bash* *bash*

*bash* *bash* *bash* 15 eh? Will that be enough for the rest of the journey? I hope so. But I also agree with Mitchell. Surely you must have much more to say. *bash* *bash* *bash*

*Bash* *Clash* *Bash* ?? It absolutely is! At least for the first few days when we don’t have the results of many night actions to go off. What would you class as enough evidence to make a vote this early on on our quest? It’s hard to say whether you sitting on the fence is you genuinely trying to be helpful or not wanting to be responsible for the death of a townie so you can shift the blame onto others in the upcoming days. Don’t forget my vote for Morgan! Reginald’s vote for me did ping me slightly as well. He talks about how voting must be done correctly. But then goes on to make a completely random vote. Albeit that has been changed since. *bash* *bash* *clash*

*bash* *bash* *bash* Tis’ a man made of straw. I jest of course. A straw man argument is when an opponent attacks a distorted version of someone’s argument. *bash* *bash* *bash*