nokialover31

For my first hanger, I would go with 2 x LEGO 30225c01, because it's easier and cheaper! in fact, how much would be explensive do a SNOT hanger of 50cm x 25 cm?? I also think that LEGO is made of things that fit togheter... so i like to have also dots in the floor to fit minifigures on them... minifigures can't just floating on the smooth floor... very unstable...and TIE fighter 7146 resting base, for example, should fit on some dots... so I buy 2 x LEGO 30225c01 and see what happens... maybe I will do something good...

Thanks markus, for example to build this hanger i would need many many piecies of different type, how can I order all of that? I can buy from many many sellers on bricklink but it would cost many shippings?!?

I am not expert, how does bricklink work? I usually buy on ebay.com, is it the same mechanism for bricklink?

What is I would use 2 LEGO 30225c01 joined togheter?

I would like to build an hangar fot my Star Wars Ships, I have only small ships (original trilogy): x wing 7140 y wing with tie fighter of Darth Vader 7150 tie fighter (the first made, the one with black and blue parts) 7146 The question is: how could I make an hangar for these ships? I can buy a grey baseplate but hangar has smooth floor, should I buy hundreds of smotth elements to cover all the floor??

Unfortunately, before I knew all these things on walkers, I bought 7671 and 7250 sets, believing they were the walkers nearest to the Original Trilogy's ones. Now I see my mystake and I bought today 8038. So, now I sell 7671 and 7250.

I collect LEGO star wars only from ep. 3-4-5 http://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?pg=1&catString=65.258&catType=S Anyone like me?

I followed your suggestion and I bought 8038's AT-ST. Hope I did well!

Today I bought 8038's AT-ST, but i just want to understand why you all believe that 8038 is more accurate then 7657. 7657 has a lateral multiple cannon more movie accurate then 8038, and even head and eyes seem to be more similar to movie's AT-ST. 7127 from 2001 is not good, but why you all prefer 8038?

http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Lumix/STAR-WARS/8038/p1040359.jpg http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Lumix/STAR-WARS/8038/p1040360.jpg http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Lumix/STAR-WARS/8038/p1040368.jpg Why 8038 is better then 7657?

10174 is UCS series, I don't collect them

Ok, i bought it... even if it's from 2009 and i would prefer the original sets!! Now I wait it arrives from US to Italy... I don't want to do an Ewok's battle set, I just want some pieces I like...

i collect lego star wars from episode 4-5-6, i have to choose between these 2 walkers for my collection! 7217 or 7657??

7217 or 7657?? suggest me

Thanks! What do u suggest me to buy? 7127 or 7657? I'm a classic original espisodes 4-5-6 lego star wars collectionist, 7127 is from 2001, 7657 is from 2007, but this last one is more 'imperial' then the first version (7127). Why chwebekka is on an imperial walker?! In 7657 there is an imperial man instead.

i found: it's 7657 SET

I found this image: My question is from which set this walker if from? I've never seen it, I have 7671 and 7250, but where does this in photo come from??