ADHO15

That seems like a lot of figs for a simple set. I thinks $30 is a bit cheap as well with a big vehicle and a possible two new moulds for unique charactes. Also, if they were to make an Octuparra Droid, it would most likely be CW-style in a Christophsis-based set. Don't get me wrong though, I'd love the set you described and would buy it without hesitation. I'd even pay £50 for a set like that!

I think he means the same style as the Radiant VII cruiser released in 2007 but the CW version from Jedi Crash. I hope there isn't one of these as I would have to sell my current one for the new one!

Yes, Penguin, they all look very nice. Now I see why you buy the other sets for your MOCs. The results are great! Keep MOCing and MODing, buddy!

Is the Republic Dropship with AT-OT not considered as a UCS as it has a 10... number? I know you probably meant a 'proper' UCS: a large, detailed version of a vehicle but I just thought I'd say that to remind you they have technically made one UCS. A very warm welcome to Eurobricks, by the way!

We know, thank you. Please try to catch up with what's been posted many times.

Each one of those posts had something relevant in it too, not to this topic but I was just helping Ashoka find their way. We were just having a side-chat at the same time. Anyway, finished now. We've had those for so long as well. Please read up before posting!

Check the 'Star Wars Sets Anyone?' thread or there's an English thread somewhere where more local people may have an idea. They don't notice new models pop up and more space being taken up by it?

I don't think so as I remember somewhere saying it was a Shop@Home exclusive. Sorry. My parents don't like it either but I manage to persuade my mum while my dad's out.

Ah, yes. I see now. I knew there was a reason.

I think you quoted the wrong person. EDIT: Never mind, I've just seen you're edit.

Good searching Mendoza007, but we have had that picture around for a short while now. It's not your fault as it's not on the first page and you're new. KimT hasn't added it for whatever reason. Any new pics you can find would be great!

My name is the first two letters of my forename and the first two of my surname followed by my age when I joined. I use the name as a username for everything, changing to ADHO16 for most things from July last year, like my PSN name. Not very exciting but simple and easy to remember!

I haven't seen any pictures of it open. I'll check now. (tut-tut for double posting ) EDIT: No. I don't think it can hold a droid as there are no pics of it open and there are no pictures on the back of the box that suggest otherwise.

It could be. I thought it was until I saw that picture. TLG did originally use it for Qui-Gon, suggesting they still make them. I agree now. That picture looks a bit different to Obi-Wan.

Also, people may not buy the RGS and AT-TE when this new, similar set is released. I concur. A very accurate design!

A very good MOC. Very accurate to the 'real' design. It looks very small though when it should really seat four. Does it have an interior?

I find this happens a lot too but if you look here, it looks like there's something that fires them all from the back. Also, it shows how the walker attaches to the dropship.

They provide a little playability for the kids that buy them. They are sometimes and every time I flick one, I lose it! They look alright on the AAT as they don't stand out as missiles. In my opinion, they look good and add a nice touch to small military vehicles. I can't see how they would sturdily attach to either. They may just be decorative and held together only by the top. Just a theory.

There aren't many modern Star Wars LEGO sets that don't feature flick-fire missiles. The side guns of the AAT were flickies!

It's okay. Sorry for shouting. I predict it will just clip onto the handle that comes out the top of the AT-TE. The AT-OT probably has one as well. EDIT: Confirmed upon inspection of this pic.

Are you kidding? How many times has that been made clear by myself and others over the last few pages?! Please read before posting! Sorry for doing your job KimT, but its just annoying. EDIT: Just reading the above post afterwards, . It's because people post things like "I wonder if..." when that thought has been answered and discussed many times. There aren't many rumours anymore seeing as we have so many new pictures of almost final sets. I agree. Many of the sets this year are brilliant and if they all came out at once, I would have to sacrifice them all for 10195.

A quick question, are all the box designs shown at the Toy Fair final? The reason I ask is because the pictures on the back of the Tank Droid box don't have the printed pieces on. You can see what I mean on this picture.

Yes! Thank you. We've heard that so many times before. Ever since the second picture! Do you not read this thread at all? I'm sorry, but please read up before posting.

Yes indeed, well done. A little disappointed it's 30th not 3rd March but it's not that long to wait. We've known it's compatible with the AT-TE for a while now and I believe it's 16 figs, not 13.

If there is, it isn't very big. If you look back a couple of pages for the Nute Gunray close-up, you will see he's sat on a sled. I think that will just slide in and out with him sat on it. Also, there will probably just be room for one battle droid in the cockpit. The A-wing in the Home One set looks to be based on this picture. It is quite accurate.