SirSpoony

Eurobricks New Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    8

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About SirSpoony

Spam Prevention

  • What is favorite LEGO theme? (we need this info to prevent spam)
    Technic
  • Which LEGO set did you recently purchase or build?
    1259 (still better than any set of the past 5 years)

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    Seattle, WA
  • Interests
    F1, Lego, Beans

Extra

  • Country
    USA

Recent Profile Visitors

295 profile views
  1. SirSpoony
    The next Technic Contest?
  2. SirSpoony
    When does this contest officially start and end? (Dates)
  3. SirSpoony started following syclone
  4. SirSpoony
    any set that started with '42'
  5. SirSpoony
    And is unbeatable on a dry wooden floor
  6. SirSpoony
    Yeah, I agree that we give it too much slack, when the only thing it ever did wrong was have shitty unsprung perpendicular suspension, exposed pins, hypersensitive clutch gears that kicked in whenever encountering a slope greater than 7 degrees, all wheel axles being open and having differentials between each of them, and a crane that tended to rip out the central frame of the model when lifting heavy weights, but apart from that, yeah, I agree with you on that.
  7. SirSpoony
    The 42056 was based on a RWD car. However, the real car had multilink rear suspension which was failed to replicate. And you, sir, have lost the privilege to post on this thread. 42070 fits the bill of my question in every conceivable way.
  8. SirSpoony
    What, in your opinion, is the most infuriating detail on any specific Technic set? This could be a grille, or the orientation of a wheel/s, or any other little thing of note, such as a mechanical axis point. Also, it doesn't have to be a bad or a good set, this is focusing solely on the specific detail of the model.
  9. SirSpoony SirSpoony changed their profile photo
  10. SirSpoony
    What about building Studless sets in a Studful manner? I can see absolutely no way this could go poorly whatsoever.