n7zhang

My dear friend, I just checked with my financial information terminal, the figure is quite scary. Take good care of yourself and you family as well. Upside is that the curing rate starts to go up north and deviates from the death rate. It should be much better with in 1-2 weeks. Wish you all the best and hope Italy will come back alive soon. One side-story, price of Ferrari and Lamborghini had gone up both new ones and used ones in china due to the virus......very very sad.

Honestly I do not understand what @Parazels is trying to prove here. First of all, it is a moc, a designer can do what ever he wants, this is at least what I understand. designers are human with all types of backgrounds, not all of them are specialised in mechanical engineering or calculating. So miscalculations or minor frauds might pop up here and there. I do believe that the designer is very happy about discussing these issues and to improve his/her moc. In this particular case, the designer admitted that he miscalculated a bit which result the front of the boom is slightly lower than the horizontal level. None of us took this as a big issue as in the realistic world RTC does look the same, and that is why we think this adds a little bit of "realism". Our dear @Parazels seems to have a very persistent mind that a slope is not acceptable even if RTC in the real world was demonstrated. In terms of "good looking" or upward front end, 42082 should fit @Parazels appetite (great set though, I have a RC version my own). If our dear @Parazels can present us a great moc with exactly horizontal boom along with "horizontal" RTC pics in the real world, please do. Otherwise, indeed, I think the "horizontal" discussion should end here. Last piece, @suffocation and all other who can read this message and currently locate in Europe, do mind your safety, nCoV-19 is very dangerous, make sure to ware masks, goggles and disposable gloves when you are out, wash your hands as often as possible, avoid gathering in any form. Hope everything ends soon.

As the designer said, he might miscalculated......but turns out it just add a little more realism into this design

the front end looks slightly lower, I think it should be this way.

or he can go by airbrush......couldn't get his point

keep us posted, we would love to see the real baby

interesting rover!

Apologise, last time I did not turn on the VPN so I could see the picure but not the youtube video. I thought it was for display only. Now I see the video, nice work indeed

nice work！but I am really confused if this one is indeed a tech moc

nice work！

I would say at least 2 L motors

very nice model! congratulations!

Both are good. My solution is to make PF sets (eg. 42082) fully RC and enhance non-PF sets (eg. 42056) with HoG mods.

After reading this post and found out about that Vonado's warehouse is in Shenzhen, China. I can barely say anything other than apologizing for what happened to those creators. Quote from @Clawp , "People who really like your work and really wanna support you, are gonna find a way to do it (donations or paying for instructions). The only noble reward you might get... is that someone is happy with your creation in their living room, based on your instructions :).", I totally agree with that and I am willing to pay for authentic lego parts and MOC instructions.

nice build, have you considered adding a secondary hook?