Eurobricks Vassals
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Davidz90

  • Birthday 01/09/1990

Profile Information

  • Gender


  • Country

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Davidz90

    [MOC] Mechanical Game of Life

    Incredible . Very interesting idea and great execution!
  2. I think it should work ok as long as the zeppelin is more or less hanging on them. In pure tension or compression, even a single liftarm can withstand 3+ kg. I had a gravity powered clock where the 2.5 kg weight was hanging on two liftarms. There was no damage after a week.
  3. Davidz90

    My mechanical clocks

    Thanks! Figuring out gear ratios took me more time than actually building the thing :D Lining up u-joints is definitely a good idea. Another thing I'd like to improve is to use a large turntable for frame rotation - that would be much less wobbly. Sure, I have few photos on Flickr: Orrery_5 by David_Z1, on Flickr Orrery_1 by David_Z1, on Flickr Orrery_2 by David_Z1, on Flickr Orrery_3 by David_Z1, on Flickr Orrery_4 by David_Z1, on Flickr
  4. Davidz90

    My mechanical clocks

    And now something slightly different: an orrery! It was a challenge to get proper orbital periods with possibly simple gear ratios. The result: 99.87% accuracy!
  5. Thanks! This is my own design, not a set. No clue how much all the bricks would cost, but I guess not that much. The construction is actually simple: There are no rare/expensive parts, only bunch of beams, plates and technic bricks :P
  6. Davidz90

    My mechanical clocks

    Ken Kuo has many excellent animations of various escapements: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2h07cGBpJs8bF3OkgtJICg Other than that, there are many other animations. As for books etc, unfortunately I don't know any good references. The Arnfield, while conceptually a bit more advanced than other escapements, is actually pretty easy to pull off. The critical part is making sure that unlocking the escape wheel takes less energy than the wheel delivers by lifting the gravity arm back up. Basically, the escapement tuning is like this: gravity arm fails to lift? -> it has to be lighter or more torque is needed gravity arm jumps erratically? -> less torque or heavier arm is needed escape wheel fails to unlock? -> needs heavier gravity arm or less unlocking friction pendulum works for a while then stops? -> needs heavier gravity arm or less unlocking friction I have done recently an instruction for my Arnfield escapement:
  7. Davidz90

    My mechanical clocks

    Another design in microwatt power range. Combines very long period pendulum with "spring" made of carbon fiber strip.
  8. One thing comes to mind: Everything worth doing is worth overdoing Interesting idea and great build!
  9. Thanks! Limb strength is a major problem here. Ideally, they should be a single piece - a connection in the middle of a limb is just asking for trouble. Keep in mind that while the string has 5 kg pull, this is after the compound system - the limbs hold some 15-20 kg. I'm thinking about something like Ravin R15 crossbow - I'm arleady pretty close to it in overall dimensions, and the limbs are short.
  10. Congratulations @MegaRoi, @Didumos69 and @Anto! That was a very fun contest
  11. New version, with double power. This is what "giving up on safety margins" means
  12. 24: 10 25: 6 15: 4 9: 3 3: 2 10: 1 Good luck everyone!
  13. Great design! Yes, the COG is in proper place. That panel is pretty much blanketed by front anyways and contributes very little to lift. Moving wing back is a good idea - You could unload the front a bit. Moreover, the current front design has pretty significant area and might generate lift on its own.
  14. @agrof, great pictures and explanation. You are right, both configurations are viable. I'm no aerodynamics expert either, but my worry is that the stabilizer, as pictured, would not act as a smooth wing. Instead, it would just shove the air in one direction, like this (sorry for butchering Your sketch :D): img by David_Z1, on Flickr Anyways, lifting tail is a more tricky configuration - when the tail stalls, nose goes up and tail stalls even more. With stabilizer pushing downwards, stall causes the nose to drop - aircraft dives, accelerates and restores proper airflow over the tail.
  15. COG is still far too aft - it should be slightly behind the leading edge. I'd suggest adding a beam at the front, and then adding weight at the end of it - this way You can shift cog without adding much weight. Moreover, the tail has to generate a force pushing it down - it might need some inclination. Maybe use a thin string to connect tip of vertical stabilizer and front of an airplane? That way You can bend the tail up a little and make it more rigid at the same time. Lastly, since dihedral is not an option with this construction, moving COG downwards (like in a hang glider) is a good idea too.