Nom Carver Posted October 12, 2015 Thanks guys, I updated the first post with your pics. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Artanis I Posted October 13, 2015 I think the 2nd Maul face is the best. I only have the CW and the awful 3rd one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nom Carver Posted October 13, 2015 I think the 2nd Maul face is the best. I only have the CW and the awful 3rd one. Agreed! after that one they only started to look quite awful. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nom Carver Posted October 1, 2016 AT-ST comparison at Brick Fanatics: http://brickfanatics.co.uk/75153-at-st-walker-review/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LiLmeFromDaFuture Posted October 1, 2016 Many thanks Nom Carver! The AT-ST has certainly com a long way from its first set. Despite the clunky appearance of the legs, the Rogue One version is clearly LEGO's best! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1980-Something-Space-Guy Posted October 1, 2016 (edited) Thanks for the comparison link! Now I feel the pull to the consumerist side... Gotta get that new AT-ST... Edited October 1, 2016 by BrickHat Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TWP Posted October 2, 2016 Wow, the new AT-ST looks bigger then I expected, quite a bit taller then Lego last's rendition. Hoping it won't dwarf the AT-AT walker Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nom Carver Posted October 2, 2016 17 hours ago, LiLmeFromDaFuture said: The AT-ST has certainly com a long way from its first set. Despite the clunky appearance of the legs, the Rogue One version is clearly LEGO's best! Indeed, it is a huge improvement over its predecessors (unlike many other vehicles), yet some of the older versions still have some charm to themselves. 17 hours ago, BrickHat said: Thanks for the comparison link! Now I feel the pull to the consumerist side... Gotta get that new AT-ST... Give up and join the consumer side. 14 minutes ago, TWP said: Wow, the new AT-ST looks bigger then I expected, quite a bit taller then Lego last's rendition. Hoping it won't dwarf the AT-AT walker Sadly it does, the new AT-AT looks puny beside this guy, specially because its huge head compared to the skinny body. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1980-Something-Space-Guy Posted October 2, 2016 6 hours ago, Nom Carver said: Give up and join the consumer side. Fair enough, once I have more money again I will. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wesker Posted October 3, 2016 The latest AT-ST is a massive improvement over the first two. I still think the Battle of Endor one holds up rather well though. The size and proportions are quite nice even if it lacks the polish of the newest version. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BrickBob Studpants Posted January 25, 2017 I made a comparison picture of all light-flesh versions of Qui-Gon Jinn: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Forresto Posted January 27, 2017 What an amazing topic and source of reference. I cant believe ive missed this for so long. I might have some model comparisons I can contribute. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
arc Posted January 27, 2017 ] I unfortunately don't own the original AAT from the early 2000's, but here's a comparison between the newer two. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nom Carver Posted January 28, 2017 (edited) Thanks guys! this topic is still alive because of you!!! , frontpage updated. Qui-Gon Jinn comparison by Lego-Freak: AAT comparison by arc: Edited January 28, 2017 by Nom Carver Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eliminator Posted May 21, 2017 Sorry for the thread bump, any updates? This is a great topic! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites