Robert8

Looney Tunes 2021 - Rumors & Discussion

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Itaria No Shintaku said:

Monica had benefits.
Rachel had benefits.
Joey had benefits.
Phoebe had benefits.
Chandler had benefits.
Ross had benefits.

A Friend reference? I'm missing a tenuous link,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Itaria No Shintaku said:

7 - This one too, at least his torso
8 - But his friend didn't.

7 is obviously Porky Pig, and I think 8 might be Foghorn Leghorn. He is friends with Porky and there is much discussion about how his torso will be made.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Itaria No Shintaku said:

Monica had benefits.
Rachel had benefits.
Joey had benefits.
Phoebe had benefits.
Chandler had benefits.
Ross had benefits.

Friends with benefits in a Looney Tunes context? This one’s pretty cryptic :wacko: 

Either way, the human characters like Elmer Fudd, Yosemite Sam or Granny all appear to be missing. Don’t get me wrong, the selection sounds great, but I’m already hoping for a second series :laugh:

Edited by Lego-Freak

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Lego-Freak said:

Friends with benefits in a Looney Tunes context? This one’s pretty crytpic :wacko:

What that show teached me is that we weren't just looking at, you know, Joey and Chandler's friendship.
Or Monica and Rachel's one.
It was called Friends. I believe that Rachel and Ross were friends too.
Now that may not be related, or may be, who knows, I'm just tryina steering people from their wrong path.
There are bleak and bare paths. And there are paths with flowers.

Btw

I said enough.
They're out in a month so you won't have to wait this long.
I need to focus on charlie or it will never reach 10k.

And, last thing, I find 8 out of 12 brilliant. I am 5% disappointed just one fig is meh.

Edited by Itaria No Shintaku

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Itaria No Shintaku said:

What that show teached me is that we weren't just looking at, you know, Joey and Chandler's friendship.
Or Monica and Rachel's one.
It was called Friends. I believe that Rachel and Ross were friends too.
Now that may not be related, or may be, who knows, I'm just tryina steering people from their wrong path.
There are bleak and bare paths. And there are paths with flowers.

Maybe a Lego Friends animal mold is being used for someone? Or one smaller character is being packed in with a larger one?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Mattah12 said:

Maybe a Lego Friends animal mold is being used for someone? Or one smaller character is being packed in with a larger one?

Maybe they're all actually minidolls. :laugh_hard:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Itaria No Shintaku said:

I said enough.
They're out in a month so you won't have to wait this long.

Thanks for your hints, much appreciated :thumbup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, PavillionDweller said:

Maybe they're all actually minidolls. :laugh_hard:

Haha, oh god! That would make me more than 5% disappointed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Itaria No Shintaku said:

What that show teached me is that we weren't just looking at, you know, Joey and Chandler's friendship.
Or Monica and Rachel's one.
It was called Friends. I believe that Rachel and Ross were friends too.
Now that may not be related, or may be, who knows, I'm just tryina steering people from their wrong path.
There are bleak and bare paths. And there are paths with flowers.

Btw

I said enough.
They're out in a month so you won't have to wait this long.
I need to focus on charlie or it will never reach 10k.

And, last thing, I find 8 out of 12 brilliant. I am 5% disappointed just one fig is meh.

Cheers for the game and good luck with Charlie; it'd make a great set! :laugh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So apparantly the first episode of the 2011 Looney Tunes Show was titled 'Best Friends' and featured Bugs and Daffy. That's the best I can come up with so far :tongue:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Itaria No Shintaku said:

What that show teached me is that we weren't just looking at, you know, Joey and Chandler's friendship.
Or Monica and Rachel's one.
It was called Friends. I believe that Rachel and Ross were friends too.
Now that may not be related, or may be, who knows, I'm just tryina steering people from their wrong path.
There are bleak and bare paths. And there are paths with flowers.

Btw

I said enough.
They're out in a month so you won't have to wait this long.
I need to focus on charlie or it will never reach 10k.

And, last thing, I find 8 out of 12 brilliant. I am 5% disappointed just one fig is meh.

Thank you so much / Grazie Millie for the vague hints and fun game! I appreciate it so  much - I enjoy readin this game here!

Good luck wiht Charlie and the Chocolate Factory project!!  :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Falconfan1414 said:

Bingo

Really? *oh2* She did occur to me but I didn't even bother suggesting it 'cause it felt like too deep of a cut compared to, say, someone like Granny but... Legit stumped me a bit.

Then again, never looked closer to see that she's OG from the 30s', thought she was a product solely of The Looney Tunes Show.

That's a choice then. Now we just wait for pics for official lineup confirmation; April inbound!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure how to feel about it :sceptic: Tweety and Road Runner taking up spots instead of being accessories seems like a waste of space. Not to mention Petunia, who is such an obscure character these days that I totally forgot she even existed. What's the point of wasting a slot on her? We really should've gotten Yosemite Sam and Elmer instead :cry_sad:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, admiral_typhoon said:

Petunia makes sense just as Lola does - reusing head moulds.

They can't 

The character has pigtails 

Just now, Tygurah said:

Not sure how to feel about it :sceptic: Tweety and Road Runner taking up spots instead of being accessories seems like a waste of space. Not to mention Petunia, who is such an obscure character these days that I totally forgot she even existed. What's the point of wasting a slot on her? We really should've gotten Yosemite Sam and Elmer instead :cry_sad:

I assume the same rule from the Disney series applies here. A character can't an accesory for another character. That would be getting 2x1 

 

I'm ready for Road Runner to be an aberration

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Robert8 said:

They can't 

The character has pigtails 

new rubber hairpiece perhaps or a pin solution like the donald duck head mould?

It's hard to speculate anything when not a single headpiece has leaked - really the only leaks we've had were shop listings and a single pic of porky's torso. They really are improving their security!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Robert8 said:

I assume the same rule from the Disney series applies here. A character can't an accesory for another character. That would be getting 2x1 

Eh, I assumed that since it's Warner Bros it wouldn't be the case. We've gotten Dorothy and Toto before, as well as Newt Scamander and Niffler, Dumbledore and Fawkes, Voldemort and Nagini etc. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Tygurah said:

Eh, I assumed that since it's Warner Bros it wouldn't be the case. We've gotten Dorothy and Toto before, as well as Newt Scamander and Niffler, Dumbledore and Fawkes, Voldemort and Nagini etc. 

But those are all pets. 

Road Runner is its own character. Same with Tweety

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Robert8 said:

But those are all pets. 

Road Runner is its own character. Same with Tweety

Technically speaking, Tweety is Granny's pet :tongue:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, LOTR34 said:

No Witch Hazel :look:

And no Pepe Le Pew

TLG dodged a bullet there considering these we already produced when that stupid controversy started

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.