Lego David

Is Constracion Dead?

Recommended Posts

Since 1999, when constracion was first introduced with Slizers (or Trowbots), there wasn't a single year that didn't have it. In 1999 we had Slizers. In 2000 we had Robo Riders. In 2001-2010 we had Bionicle. In 2010-2014 we had Hero Factory, in 2015-2016 we had Bionicle Generation 2, and in 2016-2018 we had the Star Wars Buildable Figures. So, 2019 marks as the first year without any constraction sets.

What do you think? Is constraction gone for good, or will it continue in 2020 or something? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hard to predict. It's entirely possible that LEGO might have been developing a new constraction line for a 2019 release and had to delay it for some reason or another. It's not unheard of them to do that — I've seen posts asserting that the Dots theme intended for release this year has been delayed due to one of the materials not meeting the LEGO Group's quality standards, and even Ninjago's release was held back a year so as to get it just right before its big debut. There's always the very real possibility that LEGO wanted to avoid launching too many new themes this year since they didn't want the huge marketing emphasis on The LEGO Movie 2 to drown them out.

Conversely, it's also possible that with the company's growth trajectory looking a little less reliable than it had seemed from 2005 onward, LEGO might be purposely trying to avoid too much emphasis on themes that depend so heavily on a parts palette that few other themes employ. And in that case, if/when a constraction theme does come back, it might employ a totally different building system, perhaps one utilizing 10.2mm ball joints like the Mixels so that the parts are easier to spread out across other themes than G1 Bionicle or CCBS parts were.

It would certainly be poetic if a new constraction theme were to come out in 2021 for the 20th anniversary of Bionicle's launch, but usually I get the sense that LEGO prefers to schedule product releases they have long-term plans for according to when both the product line is ready for market and the market is ready for the product line, not according to what would be most "poetic".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Aanchir said:

Conversely, it's also possible that with the company's growth trajectory looking a little less reliable than it had seemed from 2005 onward, LEGO might be purposely trying to avoid too much emphasis on themes that depend so heavily on a parts palette that few other themes employ. And in that case, if/when a constraction theme does come back, it might employ a totally different building system, perhaps one utilizing 10.2mm ball joints like the Mixels so that the parts are easier to spread out across other themes than G1 Bionicle or CCBS parts were.

Perhaps as a potential replacement for the BrickHeadz theme, maybe Lego could introduce a System-based line of licensed six-inch/twelve-inch action figures, utilizing a mix of new System-based constraction parts, printed features like BrickHeadz, and other preexisting System components. :shrug_confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Buildable figures from mainly system parts - especially ones using Mixel style joints - might be very popular with both figure builders and regular / system builders. Even more so if this means they introduce the towball parts in more useful colours such  for flesh. They would also be much more easily customised.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Say, could a line of System-constructed, Minifigure-piloted mecha sold individually like constraction figures be considered as such? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Digger of Bricks said:

Say, could a line of System-constructed, Minifigure-piloted mecha sold individually like constraction figures be considered as such? 

It's a good question. I would say so — after all, the Knights' Kingdom II constraction sets were System-based, and the Invasion from Below battle machines were minifigure-scale piloted mecha.

At the same time, that raises the question of how broadly you can define constraction before it loses all useful meaning as a discrete category. After all:

  • There's no lower bound on how much articulation a constraction set must have (the Turaga had fewer points of articulation than even a LEGO minifigure)
  • Constraction sets do not need to be humanoid or even bipedal in form (the Visorak, Tunneler Beast, and many of the Elemental Creatures were not)
  • Constraction sets do not need to contain any type of "action features" like swinging arms or shooting projectiles (the 2010 Hero Factory heroes and General Grievous did not).
  • Constraction sets can contain System or Technic-based props and vehicles regardless of size (such as the catapult in the King Jayko set, the trap in the Karzahni set, or the Drop Ship)

Ultimately, I would perhaps be willing to include such sets as the Nexo Knights Battle Suits or even the Creator 3-in-1 Rescue Robot under the broad umbrella of how "constraction" is defined. But I would be much more wary about opening the definition up to include such sets as the Ice Dragon Attack, Shadow Crawler, Recon Robot, or Park Animals.

Perhaps, though, we should be taking that as a sign that the terms "constraction" or "buildable figure" are no longer a useful way of classifying specific themes and subthemes now that there are so many different ways of creating a buildable LEGO action figure, and so many different themes and subthemes containing them.

After all, a lot of this probably comes down to the similar messiness of how the term "action figure" is defined, since action figures are defined not by their subject matter so much as their intended play pattern and target demographic, both of which tend to be a lot more flexible with a versatile building toy like LEGO than with non-buildable toy brands.

Edited by Aanchir

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Aanchir said:

Perhaps, though, we should be taking that as a sign that the terms "constraction" or "buildable figure" are no longer a useful way of classifying specific themes and subthemes now that there are so many different ways of creating a buildable LEGO action figure, and so many different themes and subthemes containing them.

For me, the term "constraction" has always denoted various sub-systems of construction parts rather than a collection of lines/playthemes that utilize it (if I were being more specific with the term, that is).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, MAB said:

Buildable figures from mainly system parts - especially ones using Mixel style joints - might be very popular with both figure builders and regular / system builders. Even more so if this means they introduce the towball parts in more useful colours such  for flesh. They would also be much more easily customised.

Oh, you mean like the 2019 Minecraft brick-built figures?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, MatthewRC said:

Oh, you mean like the 2019 Minecraft brick-built figures?

I am sorry to say it but I don't consider those yo be Constraction. Considering them this way would be like saying that the Mixels are also constraction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We are in an age where many of Lego's themes are inclusive of things that used to be their own thing. Take mechs for example- Lego's first major attempt at getting System based mechs out there was Exo Force, a line entirely dedicated to that concept. IMO, we will never see a one-for-one replacement for that line, because now mechs are everywhere. Marvel, DC, Ninjago, Overwatch, TLM2, etc. 

There are a few companies that tried buildable action figures- Mega Construx tried with Halo buildable figures, Hasbro tried with Construct bots, etc- I think the market out there just isn't big enough for these things now. Now, we have things like those mechs I mentioned above, we have large dragons in Ninjago, Mega has buildable Pokemon and ultra poseable/realistic minifigures... builds that are more compatible with the standard Lego system and existing themes. Lego has tried a lot of different avenues, from doing theme specific buildable figures like Star Wars and Chima, to the more story driven Bionicle, and less so Hero Factory. There was a time when Bionicle was Lego's story and media giant- and I think now, Ninjago carries that torch. It's one of, if not the, most successful in-house story driven brands LEGO has. In 2018, it continued to be in their top 5 selling themes. It follows in that standard "Hero for each element" style, and even sells these minifigures in individual packs with the spinners and whatnot.

With that in mind, I feel like Lego is moving past the need to create figures with the CCBS system. Technic exists in it's own right because of sales, and continues to be a massive driver of functions and structure in system sets. I wouldn't count out the possibility of ever seeing dedicated buildable figures lines again, especially ones that utilize the Mixels system- but I have a feeling much of what we consider traditional constraction is not going to continue, because Lego finally found a ball-and-socket system that is more compatible with system, something that is better able to enhance other lines.

 

TLDR, I think CCBS is dead (except for the odd use of a large ball joint here and there), but constraction lives on in a way through LEGO's current day system themes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, VBBN said:

With that in mind, I feel like Lego is moving past the need to create figures with the CCBS system. Technic exists in it's own right because of sales, and continues to be a massive driver of functions and structure in system sets.

Well then, Lego should really bring functional Mecha to the Technic theme! :smug: For that matter, being as unrestrained as they are compared to others, both the Technic and Creator themes ought to incorporate more of the fantastical to each of their annual line-ups. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Digger of Bricks said:

Well then, Lego should really bring functional Mecha to the Technic theme! :smug: For that matter, being as unrestrained as they are compared to others, both the Technic and Creator themes ought to incorporate more of the fantastical to each of their annual line-ups. 

True,  that also brings up a different point that Lego's overall portfolio definitely leans more on licensed themes now than ever before. Yes in-house themes like City and Ninjago exist, but where licensed themes lie, we don't really have in-house themes to match. Star Wars is a powerhouse and we never really get original space themes, Speed Champions has taken out Racers, and to your point- Many of Technic's flagship sets are now massive licensed vehicles with less functionality than many other similarly priced (or cheaper) sets, whereas previously they focused on more original vehicles and we saw them branch out to things like Spybotics, Slizers and Bionicle in a way. Creator even touches the licenses now by offering the licensed car each year, but I think of any line that's the one that could and does offer the biggest variety already.

 

It's not necessarily that constraction is dead, it's that Lego is far, far more selective with their in house themes. The early 2000s were a period of weird shit because Lego was experimenting. They still do that today, but we see it in the form of one-and-done licenses, IDEAS sets, etc. I'm not saying they are cutting them completely, we've had some interesting stuff like Chima, Nexo Knights, and now the upcoming Hidden Side, but it's definitely a much different portfolio than before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ideally, it would definitely be great if a new original action figure theme comes out. G2 was great to me personally and I was quite sad to see it go. Been waiting for one ever since.

However, in the absense of it, I begin to turn more into system themes so yeah, realistically I'm also glad it's not coming as the current system themes heavily taking my budget hardly leaving room for extras as having a new action figure theme would really get me.*huh*

But if it ever does come back! I definitely would be whooping in joy regardless of budget.:laugh:

Edited by JJ Tong (zfogshooterz)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/18/2019 at 10:42 AM, VBBN said:

It's not necessarily that constraction is dead, it's that Lego is far, far more selective with their in house themes. The early 2000s were a period of weird shit because Lego was experimenting. They still do that today, but we see it in the form of one-and-done licenses, IDEAS sets, etc.

This, right here people. You want to see something pure constraction? You create something GOOD on Ideas and market the hell out of it.

My frequent suggestions to marketing of another Master Builder type kit notwithstanding, something huge and towering would be lovely...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lots of sets in recent years have had brick built articulated figures/mechs/monsters.

I do personally prefer brick built, and ratcheted joints over the old Slizer ball joints.

A lot of designs that were once technic only, gotten smaller, into more clip/bar and small ball joints/hinges as well.

That said, a more recent System theme like Nexo Knights did have quite a lot of Technic parts integrated in it's designs.

Edited by TeriXeri

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.