Recommended Posts

Hey Eurobricks,

PunktacoNYC back again with another rock crawler! This time it's called the Rocket Crawler and it is my largest, fastest crawler yet.

rocket3213123.jpeg

 

Youtube video: 

 

 

Features:

- 4 L-Motors for drive (one per wheel)

- Ackerman steering with custom virtual pivot system to maximize steering angle

- Rigid, triangulated 4-link suspension with 100% Lego-legal original, extra large links

- Very minimal, light bodywork, and a cute rocket atop the cab

- BuWizz for extra power and SBrick for a great custom control scheme

- RC4WD 2.2” Bully Competition Tires

 

The initial inspiration for this crawler was twofold; I wanted to build a RC competition super-class-like crawler, what with giant relative wheel size, slim body, and high articulation. I also really wanted to make use of RC4WD's quite large Bully competition tires. 

This project has been in development for over a year thanks primarily to issues with the front axle.

The problem with the front axle was that Lego universal joints simply could not handle the high torque required to spin such large tires. I tried using custom Lego universal joints custom dremeled brass remote-controlled boat u-joints, and even knob gears at the pivot point - nothing worked.

screen_shot_2019-03-03_at_10.27.28_am.pn

So, I mounted the motors directly to the wheels, all within a virtual system to move the steering pivot closer to the center of the wheel for a better turning radius.

There is approximately 90° of articulation between the front and rear axles:unadjustednonraw_thumb_754.jpg

Easily adjustable suspension height:

(high)

unadjustednonraw_thumb_73a.jpg

(medium)

unadjustednonraw_thumb_738.jpg

(low)unadjustednonraw_thumb_741.jpg

The chassis:

unadjustednonraw_thumb_756.jpg

Wheel comparison:

lego_tires.png

 

Concept 1:

img_4038.jpeg

Concept 2 (later):

screen_shot_2018-09-04_at_9.23.03_am.png

 

This has been my favorite project. Let me know what you think.

 

P.s. I got a snupps page (nice idea, Sariel): https://www.snupps.com/punktaconyc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That’s some serious climbing ability! In the words of Sir Jeremy Clarkson ‘What a Machine!!!’

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I absolutely love this build and was one of the ones who build your chili crawler.  However, not too sure about the tire choice.  I get 2.2 instead of 1.9, but the tires used don't look very grippy or knobby.  One of the benefits to having such a great steering system in a crawler is to steer the vehicle back and forth as it climbs, but only if the hope is the that knobby tires can catch something.  There really isnt any knobs on the outer edges of these tires.  You probably would get much better results switching to other ones. 

Either way though.... the virtual steering system is genius and one L motor per tire?   That is incredible.  It would be fun to build this and pit it against the chili crawler. If you were to make instructions I would definitely be one to build it.

Edited by nerdsforprez

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, nerdsforprez said:

I absolutely love this build and was one of the ones who build your chili crawler.  However, not too sure about the tire choice.  I get 2.2 instead of 1.9, but the tires used don't look very grippy or knobby.  One of the benefits to having such a great steering system in a crawler is to steer the vehicle back and forth as it climbs, but only if the hope is the that knobby tires can catch something.  There really isnt any knobs on the outer edges of these tires.  You probably would get much better results switching to other ones. 

Either way though.... the virtual steering system is genius and one L motor per tire?   That is incredible.  It would be fun to build this and pit it against the chili crawler. If you were to make instructions I would definitely be one to build it.

Thank you! And you are correct in that the lack of knobs on these tires is detrimental to its grip, particularly on loose surfaces. But, I've found that the Bully tires work quite well when kept on plain rock and grass.

 

I'll be working on instructions on my next large bout of free time, whenever that may be. :grin:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is very good news.  I will definitely be building it. Your Chili Crawler was pretty much the ONLY Lego RC vehicle that I have considered fun to drive. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/3/2019 at 19:58, PunkTacoNYC said:

Grazie! E tu hai ragione nel senso che la mancanza di manopole su questi pneumatici è dannosa per la sua presa, in particolare su superfici sciolte. Ma ho scoperto che le gomme Bully funzionano abbastanza bene se tenute su roccia e erba.

 

Lavorerò alle istruzioni per il mio prossimo periodo di tempo libero, in qualunque momento. :sorriso:

hello...I wanted to ask you a question ..... unfortunately I'm a beginner with moc .... you surely know more than me ... the receiver sbrick that you know has the doors stabilized to 9v? so using the buwizz in ludricous mode how does the receiver behave?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, RichTech said:

hello...I wanted to ask you a question ..... unfortunately I'm a beginner with moc .... you surely know more than me ... the receiver sbrick that you know has the doors stabilized to 9v? so using the buwizz in ludricous mode how does the receiver behave?

So, I have BuWizz 1.0, which does not have ludicrous mode. But, my BuWizz does have the fast mode which supposedly outputs 9.2v, and there is a noticeable difference between regular Lego Lipo rechargeable battery/BuWizz normal mode and BuWizz fast mode. I have not had any power stability issues with the BuWizz fast mode and Sbrick - the two work together excellently.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/3/2019 at 19:49, PunkTacoNYC said:

Quindi, ho BuWizz 1.0, che non ha la modalità ridicola. Ma, il mio BuWizz ha la modalità veloce che presumibilmente produce 9.2 v, e c'è una differenza notevole tra la normale batteria ricaricabile Lego Lipo / modalità normale BuWizz e la modalità veloce BuWizz. Non ho avuto problemi di stabilità di potenza con la modalità veloce BuWizz e Sbrick - i due lavorano insieme in modo eccellente.

Thx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, PunkTacoNYC said:

@nerdsforprez Well I had some free time, so here are the Rocket Crawler instructions, in LXF form. 

There are photos in the brickshelf folder as well which clarify incorrect parts of the LXF.

Enjoy, everyone!

Great! Thank you!.  I will get around to building this, but unfortunately it may not be for a long time.  Work has (literally) taken me from my collection, and I won't be home any time soon. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank You :)
I will give it a try! Not sure that I will succeed but at least I will try. Because it's my first "lxf" I have a quick question...
Am I'm starting ok with LDD?
I know that there are some differences between reality and lxf but I had some problem during instalation LDD on win10, so just to be sure that it's ok and that im starting from the same point as others :) Can You check below that this is how it should look in LDD on the begining ?

UcpsVnh.jpg

If possible and if above images are correct can You direct me how I should looking for missing pieces and their lego parts number like below brick?

oD4smjX.jpg

Thank You for great model and sorry for silly and newbie questions :)

Edited by rzepa10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, rzepa10 said:

Thank You :)
I will give it a try! Not sure that I will succeed but at least I will try. Because it's my first "lxf" I have a quick question...
Am I'm starting ok with LDD?
I know that there are some differences between reality and lxf but I had some problem during instalation LDD on win10, so just to be sure that it's ok and that im starting from the same point as others :) Can You check below that this is how it should look in LDD on the begining ?

O0jMhX_m-xXQC2Ws89LEtPKp1OiCoKoFwzcmwiS9

If possible and if above images are correct can You direct me how I should looking for missing pieces and their lego parts number like below brick?

3cS3FIomLvZpcXVyJF4GTKngljDvTNFusmRV-u-E

Thank You for great model and sorry for silly and newbie questions :)

In some cases, the incorrect pieces on the LXF are not a big deal, and do not affect performance. The incorrect parts that do affect performance are obviously incorrect, as they don't fit in the model or don't function correctly. When you come across a weird building step, or a piece that seems too loose or disconnected from the rest of the build, check this folder to find a photo with the correct piece placement.

 

LMK if this helps

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, PunkTacoNYC said:

In some cases, the incorrect pieces on the LXF are not a big deal, and do not affect performance. The incorrect parts that do affect performance are obviously incorrect, as they don't fit in the model or don't function correctly. When you come across a weird building step, or a piece that seems too loose or disconnected from the rest of the build, check this folder to find a photo with the correct piece placement.

 

LMK if this helps

Thanks for reply.

I was worried that there are some missing in my LDD library. As I said, I had some problems during instalation on win10 so thats why I was asking about my LDD screenshot :)

Last question or rather preatty please :) Would It be a big problem for you to check this punktaconyc_rocket_crawler_lxf.xlsx file produced via LDD and write there on the bottom missing brick numbers that You remember that are missing or incorrect on the LDD like the brick that I circled on the previous photo?

I do not have many technics brick and in most of case Im going to search and buy them via Lego shop or bricklink so it would be much easier for me to know before building what to search and group the order.

thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, rzepa10 said:

Thanks for reply.

I was worried that there are some missing in my LDD library. As I said, I had some problems during instalation on win10 so thats why I was asking about my LDD screenshot :)

Last question or rather preatty please :) Would It be a big problem for you to check this punktaconyc_rocket_crawler_lxf.xlsx file produced via LDD and write there on the bottom missing brick numbers that You remember that are missing or incorrect on the LDD like the brick that I circled on the previous photo?

I do not have many technics brick and in most of case Im going to search and buy them via Lego shop or bricklink so it would be much easier for me to know before building what to search and group the order.

thanks

Here you go. Hope this helps. As always, lmk if any further issues arise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, PunkTacoNYC said:

Here you go. Hope this helps. As always, lmk if any further issues arise.

Thank You very much. It's much easier for me now.

Buwizz 2.0 ordered, tyres ordered, time for shopping on bricklist :) 

Could You explain me what is the function for bb339c01 ? And Do I need to buy sbrick or buwizz will be enought ?

Edited by rzepa10
update

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote
1 hour ago, rzepa10 said:

Could You explain me what is the function for bb339c01 ? And Do I need to buy sbrick or buwizz will be enought ?

 

Oh yes, forgot about that polarizing switch. It is necessary because there are four drive motors and one steering motor - five in total. Because I wanted independent front and rear axle control, I would need a minimum of three ports, which the SBrick and BuWizz both provide. But, because the two motors in both the front and rear axles are facing different directions, one needs its direction reversed. The polarizing switch reverses the direction of one of the rear drive motors so that drive for the rear axle can take up only a single port on the BuWizz, reducing five different wires to fit on four ports. For example, port 1 on BuWizz may be front right drive motor, port 2 is front left drive motor inverted, port 3 is steering, and port 4 has both rear right and rear left drive, one inverted using the polarizing switch bb339c01.

 

BuWizz is enough to control the truck with full power. I use an SBrick as it allows better, custom control schemes on my phone with which I am more used to controlling my creations. That being said, if you have an ios device and an MFI certified gamepad or an android phone and compatible gamepad, the app "Brickcontroller2" allows you to control your creation with a game controller, which I would argue is the best of all methods, and only requires BuWizz. I recently bought a Steel Series Nimbus controller to connect to my iPad and BuWizz and it is awesome. I haven't tried it on my Rocket Crawler, though I'm sure the analog controls would be a welcome upgrade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, PunkTacoNYC said:

Oh yes, forgot about that polarizing switch. It is necessary because there are four drive motors and one steering motor - five in total. Because I wanted independent front and rear axle control, I would need a minimum of three ports, which the SBrick and BuWizz both provide. But, because the two motors in both the front and rear axles are facing different directions, one needs its direction reversed. The polarizing switch reverses the direction of one of the rear drive motors so that drive for the rear axle can take up only a single port on the BuWizz, reducing five different wires to fit on four ports. For example, port 1 on BuWizz may be front right drive motor, port 2 is front left drive motor inverted, port 3 is steering, and port 4 has both rear right and rear left drive, one inverted using the polarizing switch bb339c01.

 

BuWizz is enough to control the truck with full power. I use an SBrick as it allows better, custom control schemes on my phone with which I am more used to controlling my creations. That being said, if you have an ios device and an MFI certified gamepad or an android phone and compatible gamepad, the app "Brickcontroller2" allows you to control your creation with a game controller, which I would argue is the best of all methods, and only requires BuWizz. I recently bought a Steel Series Nimbus controller to connect to my iPad and BuWizz and it is awesome. I haven't tried it on my Rocket Crawler, though I'm sure the analog controls would be a welcome upgrade.

Thank you for the exact and comprehensive answer. I can't wait for the first bricks :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Little update :) around 98% bricks already at home (not all PF on the photos because some are still in other models,) stil waiting for tyres and buwizz...

NwW4KCN.jpg

Edited by rzepa10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/8/2019 at 6:00 PM, rzepa10 said:

Little update :) around 98% bricks already at home (not all PF on the photos because some are still in other models,) stil waiting for tyres and buwizz...

MWddy1FbmAxh01n63YUThhz3M_6yMZCxZSaHrSdp

Cool! I can't see the picture tho.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cool model, I'll order it to my collection in a month :)
I wanted to ask because you have more experience. I want to take one of these models https://wisepick.org/best-rc-rock-crawler/ and remove all the plastic, instead, I want to put the body assembled from Lego, of course strengthening it. Do you think this is real or the idea is doomed to failure?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/19/2019 at 5:56 AM, Liam9653 said:

Cool model, I'll order it to my collection in a month :)
I wanted to ask because you have more experience. I want to take one of these models https://wisepick.org/best-rc-rock-crawler/ and remove all the plastic, instead, I want to put the body assembled from Lego, of course strengthening it. Do you think this is real or the idea is doomed to failure?

If you mean replacing their thin plastic bodies with one constructed of Lego, thats not a bad idea. In fact, this would allow you to create any type of look you want. The downsides are that Lego is certainly going to be heavier than whichever body comes default on those crawler. Additionally, a Lego body will break apart when crashed, no matter how well you build. Also, mounting the Lego body to the non-lego rc chassis may be difficult, but achievable with adhesive velcro or double sided tape. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.