Recommended Posts

Great review as always.

But why haven't they used 4L axles for the outriggers? I think it looks unfinished.

42082%20outriggers_zps9muwkylh.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, mortenm said:

Great review as always.

But why haven't they used 4L axles for the outriggers? I think it looks unfinished.

TLG has stopped doing that. They always (mostly) use an extra 1L divided over two sides.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, mortenm said:

Great review as always.

But why haven't they used 4L axles for the outriggers? I think it looks unfinished.

It does look pretty awful but I guess they did it so the average numbskull wouldn't knock the 4L half-beams off at the slightest sneeze and then go on the internet and complain about the model's fragility.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, suffocation said:

It does look pretty awful but I guess they did it so the average numbskull wouldn't knock the 4L half-beams off at the slightest sneeze and then go on the internet and complain about the model's fragility.

I actually thought of that, but then again - seriously? *oh2*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Erik Leppen said:

Then why not add an extra pair of black 1x4 beams? It's 4000 parts anyway, an extra 8 beams shouldn't hurt.

Then the numbskull will knock out that outermost beam too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Ngoc Nguyen said:

Then the numbskull will knock out that outermost beam too.

:roflmao:

I wish disassembling my sets was that easy...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Goldenmasamune said:

I know pf controls the crane. Is it possible to add an ir receiver and steer/drive the wheels like a remote control car?

You’d need to add two more motors to steer and drive the wheels, as well as a separate battery box so that it doesn’t tangle up in the turntable, but sure I don’t see why not :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Goldenmasamune said:

as a "First PF technic experience" would it be better to get this, or the 42070 from last year? 

This one! :thumbup: 

(better model altogether)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Started to build from what I own, ordered missing parts. 

I enjoying build very much. Last thing I enjoyed so much, was Arocs (i have built BWE, Porsche etc.)

When I started to build, realised, that I didn't needed to order

0a04b832ae01d14b4aa40c6044b5f8b7.jpg?1512919040.4983664

as they are mainly used as axle extenders, and I can replace them with 

e3f0f18002722b14c217cdbffa70f5e6.jpg?151

what I did already in two places.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually don't understand why the white 3L connector is still used so much as an extender/space filler now that we have the smoother version. Is the smoother version more expensive or something?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe in this set white ones are used, because there is so much other parts in red. So, for easyer building, clerer building instructions, they used those white parts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Jurss said:

Maybe in this set white ones are used, because there is so much other parts in red. So, for easyer building, clerer building instructions, they used those white parts.

They could use the smooth connector in LBG. Anyway, speaking realistically, it's possible that TLG has a surplus of the white connectors so they're using them up here. Would make sense, since the slump in 2017 was partially down to excess inventory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was wondering the same thing earlier... and there were areas where the red ones would have looked better, i.e.:

43616336551_d567099212_b.jpg

 

Overall, the whole crane looks a bit unfinished. Which I find a bit weird, because Olav Kroigaard also designed the Claas, which was (is) arguably one of the best looking models of LEGO Technic ever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Ngoc Nguyen said:

*co-designed

Fair enough. :classic:

But Olav also did 42053 Volvo excavator, which is again considered a highly detailed, accurate model. Maybe they (the Claas and Volvo) just look better because they have to represent the real life vehicle?

Edited by Magical Duck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BrickbyBrickTechnic said:

To be fair, he made the tractor part, which is one of the best looking subsets ever.

How do you know he did the tractor part? I don't recall having come across that in any designer video.

Edited by Ngoc Nguyen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, siddparkar said:

Does anyone have images comparing this with 42055?


It's not a true comparison pic, but you can see them both in the same picture
k9Afw8i.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Goldenmasamune said:


It's not a true comparison pic, but you can see them both in the same picture
 

Since you have both, any chance you could share a pic of them side by side?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.