BusterHaus

Gearboxes With New Orange Selector & 20z Clutch Gear

Recommended Posts

The new parts in 42083 have opened the doors to some new gearbox designs.  I saw that @Didumos69 and @Erik Leppen have started working out some potential designs, I think it would be good to have these new gearboxes collected in a single topic.

@Jim or @Milan If you think this should be merged with a different topic, please do so.

* * *

Here is a  design that makes it easy to visualize the gear ratios. It's far from compact, but the ratios are well spread out with only one overdrive gear.

Yellow - control
Green - input
Red - output

42455897721_7bce002a91_o_d.png

28582846418_60258d35e7_b_d.jpg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great idea, I was waiting for this! Here we go...

I tried making a compact sequential 4-speed gearbox layout and so far this is the most simple solution I could come up with. It's still not that easy, because to take full advantage of the new orange selector, the driving rings cannot be placed on opposite sides of a single gear selector.

To take full advantage of the new 20t clutch gears, the gear ratio between the two driving rings needs to be closer to 1:1 than the 20:12 ratio made by the new clutch gears. In this case I used 16:20. Ratios are (in foreground to background order): 4:5, 1:1, 4:3, 5:3.

  • Green is input
  • Yellow is control
  • Red is output

800x450.jpg800x450.jpg

Edited by Didumos69

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Didumos69 said:

To take full advantage of the new 20t clutch gears, the gear ratio between the two driving rings needs to be closer to 1:1 than the 20:12 ratio made by the new clutch gears. In this case I used 16:20. Ratios are: 4:5, 1:1, 4:3, 5:3

It's a very compact design, nice work.  I tried to modify it to eliminate one of the overdrive gears, but didn't have much success.  The input of gears 1/3 and 2/4 is linked, and the clutch gears don't differ that much in size, so you can't have wide variations of ratios without complicating the gearbox quite a bit. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, BusterHaus said:

It's a very compact design, nice work.  I tried to modify it to eliminate one of the overdrive gears, but didn't have much success.  The input of gears 1/3 and 2/4 is linked, and the clutch gears don't differ that much in size, so you can't have wide variations of ratios without complicating the gearbox quite a bit. 

Correct, but makes it easy to combine it with a 2-speed gearbox in an 8-speed gearbox. But it was mainly a thought expirement to use both new gearbox parts. Btw, I added an image explaining the sequence.

Edited by Didumos69

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All of this are very nice efforts, but I have one question to @Didumos69: didn't you start topic dedicated to gearboxes last year? 

I was mentioning this topic

 

Edited by I_Igor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe that this particular topic is more about conceptual possibility of new gearboxes with new parts. I mean, no one really tested them cause we have no parts yet.

I can share some unfinished LDD prototypes if anyone interested :classic: It would fit in current discussion I think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You could be right, that is why I have made question, to find out what members mean :wink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ibessonov said:

I believe that this particular topic is more about conceptual possibility of new gearboxes with new parts. I mean, no one really tested them cause we have no parts yet.

I can share some unfinished LDD prototypes if anyone interested :classic: It would fit in current discussion I think.

By all means, share your prototypes! This combination of parts ended a small "dark age" for me - I haven't been this excited about new parts in a really long time.  I can't wait to how other builders will use them. 

@I_Igor The first post asks the moderators to figure out if this topic should be merged with a different one. I'll leave that decision to them. 

Edited by BusterHaus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hadn't realized you could fit 12t gears meshing with the blue 20t's that way, @BusterHaus! I thought it wouldn't fit, but as the driving ring is less than 2L, it should indeed just fit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, BusterHaus said:

By all means, share your prototypes!

Ok, but "prototype" is a key word. This one is 7+R gearbox and it only uses one of new blue gears. Gear shifting mechanism is not ready, but I've been playing with some ideas to make this gearbox only 2 "layers" in hight. LDD file: https://bricksafe.com/files/ibessonov/misc/gearbox-prototype-1.lxf

Top view:

gearbox-prototype-1-top.png

Bottom view:

gearbox-prototype-1-bottom.png

 

Describing all gears meshing would be hard but main idea is that new gear allows you to save a lot of space if you use it right!

EDIT: ouch, I believe I messed up gear ratios in one place, give me 10 minutes to fix it :grin: No, it's all good!

Edited by ibessonov

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This one is pretty obvious. It's a 4 speed gearbox for 4WD vehicles with central differential.

Input is on any of 2 driving rings (they are coupled anyway), output is on the differential.

gearbox-prototype-2.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, ibessonov said:

This one is pretty obvious. It's a 4 speed gearbox for 4WD vehicles with central differential.

Input is on any of 2 driving rings (they are coupled anyway), output is on the differential.

A nice flat layout with and a wide range of ratios (1:3, 5:9, 1:1, 5:3). Personally I don't like the use of clutch gears as non-idler gears (connecting the input axles), because of its sensitivity to friction, but it's not uncommon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ibessonov said:

It's easy to fix anyway:

:thumbup: Or move the input axles up a layer:

800x450.jpg

Btw, this layout is quite similar to what I did in my rugged supercar:

800x450.jpg

Edited by Didumos69

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Didumos69 said:

Or move the input axles up a layer

Too bad that new orange selector won't fit between driving rings, it will clash with differential

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ibessonov said:

Too bad that new orange selector won't fit between driving rings, it will clash with differential

Yes, that's too bad. But even if there was no center diff, this layout wouldn't work with an orange selector inbetween. It would either engage two driving rings or none.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The gear ratios in the compact 4 speed box by @Didumos69 were not letting me rest.  This solution omits the 20z clutch gear and has the following gear ratios:

Gear 1 - 0.33
Gear 2 - 0.6
Gear 3 - 1.0
Gear 4 - 1.8

The ratio for Gear 4 is too high, but this is a compromise that was made to have only one overdrive gear.  I think this would work well in a manual model, but I'm not a fan of the double 8z gears on the output shaft, especially in the last gear.  The difference in the engine speed would be quite apparent.

42425690452_e97a485464_o_d.png


The more I play (virtually) with these new parts, the more I get the impression that they are meant for more complex gearboxes, not 4 speed ones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, BusterHaus said:

The more I play (virtually) with these new parts, the more I get the impression that they are meant for more complex gearboxes, not 4 speed ones.

Interesting setup with these 24t clutch diffs. I also have the feeling that the new orange selector does not really make life easier in simple setups. It doesn't really fit symmetrical setups either, because it can not be used between two driving rings.  I think it requires a completely different approach.

Edited by Didumos69

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, BusterHaus said:

The more I play (virtually) with these new parts, the more I get the impression that they are meant for more complex gearboxes, not 4 speed ones.

TLG's primary purpose for 'gearboxes' is spamming them into models to split a PF motor output :classic:  (So not really a gearbox, just a splitter) :wink:

I guess they'd want to showcase this new part in splitters.  I haven't figured out how that would work in detail though :wink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet it will fit inbetween two clutch rings if one is moved up by say half a stud so that the groove on the orange selector fits in both clutch rings. I'll try to figure something out when I get the parts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/30/2018 at 11:02 PM, ibessonov said:

Ok, but "prototype" is a key word. This one is 7+R gearbox and it only uses one of new blue gears. Gear shifting mechanism is not ready, but I've been playing with some ideas to make this gearbox only 2 "layers" in hight. LDD file: https://bricksafe.com/files/ibessonov/misc/gearbox-prototype-1.lxf

Top view:

 

Bottom view:

 

 

Describing all gears meshing would be hard but main idea is that new gear allows you to save a lot of space if you use it right!

EDIT: ouch, I believe I messed up gear ratios in one place, give me 10 minutes to fix it :grin: No, it's all good!

I think this ransmission would be better to make it in Chiron to achieve modification and proper improvement to original set

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, I_Igor said:

I think this ransmission would be better to make it in Chiron to achieve modification and proper improvement to original set

Chiron designers were way too restricted in size. So if we replace current W16 with something smaller then 7+R is achievable. But not with my version, it needs a lot of tuning and optimization.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ibessonov said:

Chiron designers were way too restricted in size. So if we replace current W16 with something smaller then 7+R is achievable. But not with my version, it needs a lot of tuning and optimization.

I understand your point...but as my pocket money is not enough for Chiron, I'll look at the development here :wink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.