Bricky Dee Williams Posted February 14, 2018 3 hours ago, Azani said: I believe that it's actually the store exclusive; off of that, either 76106 or 76109 would be the D2C. This would be an excellent time to stop calling it the UCS Hulkbuster. I thought this as well: if it isn’t the D2C, it may just be a large scale model like BB-8 for the wave. Not necessarily an exclusive. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Azani Posted February 14, 2018 57 minutes ago, Aegis2000 said: I thought this as well: if it isn’t the D2C, it may just be a large scale model like BB-8 for the wave. Not necessarily an exclusive. No, it's only being sold at Walmart (at least over in the states). As a supplementary note, we would have heard everything about it much earlier if it were simply an additional mainline set. 4 hours ago, SpiderJazz said: Is this true? Now I'm confused. I'm not 100% sure, but all the evidence seems to point toward that right now. If it makes you feel any better, I'm not totally sure as to what's going on here as well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Whovastron Posted February 14, 2018 4 hours ago, Azani said: I believe that it's actually the store exclusive; off of that, either 76106 or 76109 would be the D2C. This would be an excellent time to stop calling it the UCS Hulkbuster. If it has a UCS plaque, I’m calling it UCS. It’s not the first time a UCS has been exclusives to some retail stores as well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Azani Posted February 14, 2018 (edited) 1 minute ago, Whovastron said: If it has a UCS plaque, I’m calling it UCS. It’s not the first time a UCS has been exclusives to some retail stores as well. IIRC it would be the first time that a "UCS" kit had been exclusive to retailers from the time of release - but it's not a UCS set, so it's all hypothetical, right? Anyone can call it whatever they'd like, of course; I thought that I'd toss my two cents in. :) Edited February 14, 2018 by Azani Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bricky Dee Williams Posted February 14, 2018 15 minutes ago, Azani said: No, it's only being sold at Walmart (at least over in the states). I hadn’t picked up on that. That’s cool, it’s such a large set. I’m sure it’d be going to ToysRUs under different circumstances. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alberto Brick Posted February 14, 2018 I did not understand what the problem is ? and the google translator does not help. The Avengers sets are always 8, right? 6 + Hulkbuster + 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpiderJazz Posted February 14, 2018 I'm also confused with what I'm reading now. Lol. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NXS7 Posted February 14, 2018 49 minutes ago, Alberto Brick said: I did not understand what the problem is ? and the google translator does not help. The Avengers sets are always 8, right? 6 + Hulkbuster + 1 Nope, the first film had 4 and the second had 6. Well technically the second film had 7, as the Hulkbuster is the AoU variant Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scarilian Posted February 14, 2018 At this stage it is best waiting for NYTF to get clarity - it's only a few days away. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bricky Dee Williams Posted February 14, 2018 58 minutes ago, SpiderJazz said: I'm also confused with what I'm reading now. Lol. From what I’ve read, I think Azani is saying that the Hulkbuster is not at D2C, but in fact a Walmart exclusive. There was only a UPC assigned to the set number in the list I found. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GoldenNinja3000 Posted February 14, 2018 If the Hulkbuster is a Walmart exclusive, I doubt it’s $50. That would be way too good of a deal. What’s the D2C then? Is there even a D2C? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bricky Dee Williams Posted February 14, 2018 @GoldenNinja3000 Oh yeah, no way Walmart charges $50 for that set. That’s a steal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Falconfan1414 Posted February 14, 2018 A page from an instruction Manuel for the infinity war sets has leaked and it has Thanos with a completed ganulet and my god it looks incredible. Something about the ganulet with all the stones in Lego form is just incredible Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bricky Dee Williams Posted February 14, 2018 2 hours ago, Falconfan1414 said: A page from an instruction Manuel for the infinity war sets has leaked and it has Thanos with a completed ganulet and my god it looks incredible. Something about the ganulet with all the stones in Lego form is just incredible I’ve been waiting to see this besides the cartoon on the box art. Where’d you see the manual image? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BrickBob Studpants Posted February 14, 2018 26 minutes ago, Aegis2000 said: I’ve been waiting to see this besides the cartoon on the box art. Where’d you see the manual image? Edditray/ray/egolay That Thanos picture makes me wonder if the Aether (red infinity stone) is transparent after all... it's sort of hard to tell from the set pictures I hope so, it'd be really inconsistent if all of the stones were transparent apart from that one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AmericaLego Posted February 14, 2018 2 hours ago, Falconfan1414 said: A page from an instruction Manuel for the infinity war sets has leaked and it has Thanos with a completed ganulet and my god it looks incredible. Something about the ganulet with all the stones in Lego form is just incredible Wow that does look incredible! 39 minutes ago, Aegis2000 said: I’ve been waiting to see this besides the cartoon on the box art. Where’d you see the manual image? naomasali on Instagram Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bricky Dee Williams Posted February 14, 2018 It’s incredible. And the Aether is definitely transparent.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scarilian Posted February 14, 2018 I like the image, but it looks like the gems are supposed to be pushed in slightly further, they stick out a bit and it looks a bit odd. Image is clearly edited a lot - interested to see how the gems look on the completed Gauntlet, hopefully they can go in slightly more. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
oodan Posted February 14, 2018 On 13/02/2018 at 10:14 PM, THELEGOBATMAN said: It doesn't look so messy like it should be. It is really straight and like a bucket. Personally, I think his hair looked more similar to Zane's hair than LBM Bruce Wayne's hair. That hair is too long and doesn't leave much of the back of the head exposed, whereas Zane's does. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
THELEGOBATMAN Posted February 14, 2018 Just now, ood0 said: Personally, I think his hair looked more similar to Zane's hair than LBM Bruce Wayne's hair. That hair is too long and doesn't leave much of the back of the head exposed, whereas Zane's does. The best would be a new hairpiece, but we have to live with what we have. 15 hours ago, Azani said: I believe that it's actually the store exclusive; off of that, either 76106 or 76109 would be the D2C. This would be an excellent time to stop calling it the UCS Hulkbuster. Now I am really confused. What!? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GoldenNinja3000 Posted February 14, 2018 I don’t think the Aether is transparent. Wasn’t it opaque in leaked images? And it looks opaque in the set pictures as well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Digger of Bricks Posted February 14, 2018 10 hours ago, Whovastron said: If it has a UCS plaque, I’m calling it UCS. It’s not the first time a UCS has been exclusives to some retail stores as well. Much like last year's BB8, which also came with a plaque. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bricky Dee Williams Posted February 15, 2018 1 hour ago, GoldenNinja3000 said: I don’t think the Aether is transparent. Wasn’t it opaque in leaked images? And it looks opaque in the set pictures as well. Right, I mean the in the advert. It’s clearly as transparent as the rest. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PickleManDan Posted February 15, 2018 My local Target had the infinity war sets in stock, but they were street dated for March 3rd, so i wasn't able to get any of them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GoldenNinja3000 Posted February 15, 2018 2 hours ago, Aegis2000 said: Right, I mean the in the advert. It’s clearly as transparent as the rest. I feel like that’s artistic license, or it just isn’t as transparent as the others so it appears opaque in images. We’ll see, though. I hope it isn’t solid red. 1 minute ago, PickleManDan said: My local Target had the infinity war sets in stock, but they were street dated for March 3rd, so i wasn't able to get any of them. The March 3rd release date is so odd. I wonder why it isn’t March 1st like usual... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites