Tamamono Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 Clearing Melanie as Town on Day 1 whilst having some suspicions/uneasiness about her activity doesn't sit very well with me. *falsetto* Who said anything about clearing her?? I read one thing she did as town while being unsure of how to read something else. Is not being 100% on all my reads a scumtell? If it is, lock me up and hang me right now, dahling. Town can't be 100% on all their reads. We're the uninformed majority. If we were 100% on our reads, we'd be the informed majority, making this game very easy. I also don't quite understand the last sentence in BOLD . Everyone should participate, seems like you are giving them a free pass to not participate. Once again. Please enlighten me. That was a way of saying that the people I had pointed out needed to speak... I'm not giving people a free pass to not participate. That's moronic. Why are you going through all of my posts and "asking me to enlighten you" on obvious shit that you would know if you paid half as much attention to the game as you do to me??
Waterbrick Down Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 Sorry that you thought I was defending her at all - I was just trying to translate for what I thought was someone (Carlisa) was misinterpreting someone else being said. I was just trying to avoid the group going down a wasted path from thinking someone said something they didn't. Just going to say that this post is scummy to my gut, scum are always trying to keep on everyone's nice side to avoid suspicion and this really seems like pandering to me, however, it's balanced out by her continual insistence on the boring no-lynch strategy. In order to keep on everyone's nice side scum try not to go out on a limb or stick out too much with crazy ideas or things that would be considered against the norm, case in point the no lynch strategy, so I'm still up in the air with you Melanie. Brittney's most recent statement doesn't fill me with a lot of confidence as she's basically recapped her original statement and slapped a vote on. I'm going to vote: Brittany Alfredo (Piratedave84) Now can we have some more lovely songs, Alicia?
Capt. Redblade Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 So who's starting to ping today? First we have Brittney. Lovely, fluffy Brittney, who has said so much while still saying so little. Actually, no, that's not totally accurate. She still hasn't said all that much. She does seem to be flailing a bit early, with her admission that she votes at random on Day One and her vote for Ms. Masinelli which was based on some faulty logic. (And when you take that away it looks more than a bit OMFGUS-y.) Melanie's suggestion that we not lynch for the first few days has struck me as rather scummy, but to her credit she has not abandoned the idea as a scummo would. Instead, she has stood by her objectively lousy suggestion, which Mr(s). Shawty notes is not something a scum would do, when they could just as easily drop the idea like a hot potato. It's quite possible Melanie is a misguided townie. Finally, I would like to draw our attention to a statement made by Janice Capulet: Personally, I'm more worried about over thinking and then piling on someone who makes a D1 mistake (like over-fluff-posting) than under thinking, because in my past experience the former is the standard. We need to keep an eye out for scum, but we also need to realize that most townie will be 'scum-telling' on ?d1 until things really start to get going. It rubbed me the wrong way at the time (along with a couple other people after I pointed it out) and I would like to make sure we haven't swept it completely under the rug, as I do think it's worth addressing. To that effect, I say again what I say after she first made the above statement. So, are you saying we should not analyze? I don't agree with your assessment that "most townie will be 'scum-telling'". Certainly a few might be acting cagey and refusing to stick their necks out too far, but I think you'll find that the vast majority of townies will want to do their part to help the town and make it clear that they're helping the town. That usually does take the form of close analysis. It sounds to me like you're giving people a free pass to act scummy and suspicious, simply because it's Day One. At this point, I'm torn between Brittney and Janice, myself.
Tamamono Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 Mr(s). Shawty *falsetto* Just "Ms." Shawty. Do you see a ring on this finger? On that topic, are you free next Friday? Tip #5: Don't get tied down to no man!
Kristel Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 Like others, Brittney's initial post caught my attention for suggesting it's way too early to analyse anything. Analysis of what has been said so far is better than no analysis at all, and a lynch based on some analysis has got to be better than a lynch based on no analysis. Her response to being called out about that post came across as quite aggressive to me: Hey! Don't look at me; scrutinize someone else! I am a member of the council! Oh! Look over here, someone misinterpreting what I said, (actually there are several of you who did that!). What I said was: - we will lynch town today; you're already doing a great job towards that goal in voting for me; keep it up! - you cannot pretend to analyse posts as nothing of value was said not do we have previous behaviour to analyse; I would love to see an in depth analysis of today's posts! - my usual policy on day one is to lynch a lurker; it's never paid off but frankly what else can we do? I usually vote at random on day one but this time around I feel that pilling on a case which has very little substance is worthy of a vote. vote: Carlisa Masinelli (endgame) I think I should make clear that this is not an OMGUS vote but rather my opinion that piling on and then proceeding to not vote for me is scummy as hell. If you truly find my comments to be wack, then vote for me. You should do it now before the bandwagon picks up steam; it's easier for scum to hide if you vote early. I'm confused. How is this not an OMGUS response, given that Carlisa did vote for you? I see you acknowledged your error later. As I said above, analysis of posts is all we have to go on at this stage. Better to at least attempt an analysis rather than just say it's too hard and pick a lurker and hope for the best. I'm going to Vote: Brittney Alfredo (PirateDave84). I would have prefered to wait with my vote, as there are a few others that I would like to have heard from. However, I've got to do some more story-telling and then I will be needing a nap. Reading kiddy books is tiring work! Two people in particular are Janice, who hasn't said anything of substance yet, and Benvolio, who popped in briefly only, but hasn't yet come back with any points of view. The other one is Amanda. In my opinion it's ridiculous to suggest not to lynch for several days. That's just... quirky. Vote: Melanie Detruccio (mostlytechnic) This vote came across as scummy to me because it seemed to come out of the blue (it was only Amanda's second post) and I don't think it's necessarily a good reason for a vote. While I agree about Melanie's idea being a stupid idea, I don't think it necessarily makes her scum. Scum would have to be dumb to suggest something like that, even dumber to suggest we don't vote for several days. I don't think Melanie's dumb. Having said that, I will be keeping a question mark against her name too (Melanie, that is) for the time being.
TrumpetKing Posted July 28, 2013 Author Posted July 28, 2013 (edited) Vote Tally Brittney Alfredo (Piratedave84) - 6 (CallMePie, Tamamono, Endgame, Waterbrick Down, Kristel) Melanie Detruccio (Mostlytechnic) - 2 (LegoDad, PsyKater) Carlisa Masinelli (Endgame) - 1 (Piratedave84) Paris Shawty (Tamamono) - 1 (Purpearljellyblob) With 20 players, a majority of 11 votes are required to form a lynch. ~12.5 Hours remain in the day. Edited July 28, 2013 by TrumpetKing
Peanuts Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 Hey! Don't look at me; scrutinize someone else! I am a member of the council! Oh! Look over here, someone misinterpreting what I said, (actually there are several of you who did that!). What I said was: - we will lynch town today; you're already doing a great job towards that goal in voting for me; keep it up! - you cannot pretend to analyse posts as nothing of value was said not do we have previous behaviour to analyse; I would love to see an in depth analysis of today's posts! - my usual policy on day one is to lynch a lurker; it's never paid off but frankly what else can we do? I usually vote at random on day one but this time around I feel that pilling on a case which has very little substance is worthy of a vote. vote: Carlisa Masinelli (endgame) I think I should make clear that this is not an OMGUS vote but rather my opinion that piling on and then proceeding to not vote for me is scummy as hell. If you truly find my comments to be wack, then vote for me. You should do it now before the bandwagon picks up steam; it's easier for scum to hide if you vote early. This really is not the kind of response I'd like to see from a townie. I'm far from certain that she is scum, I didn't think scum would tell us that blatantly not to analyze, but that defense is definitely not a towntell. Also, I don't get the last sentence: "You should do it [vote] now before the bandwagon picks up steam; it's easier for scum to hide if you vote early." I don't get it. At all. The town should vote early so the scum can hide? Have you already given up on the town? You're no help, really. I don't know. Maybe she actually is a scum member who tried and failed to hide in the background by making a nonsential, unhelpful post, giving her "two cents" that she had to make up. It's better than nothing. *to Henry* Your opinion? Yes, her hair is bland and boring. Oh, and thanks for the compliment. Of course, I couldn't maintain such perfect hair without your help. Don't get cocky. You're not the only hair brush out there, you know? I'm not threatening you! You're watching too many mafia movies. Any help with the current situation? Of course not...why am I even asking you? *end of monologue*
Esurient Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 *falsetto* Who said anything about clearing her?? I read one thing she did as town while being unsure of how to read something else. Is not being 100% on all my reads a scumtell? If it is, lock me up and hang me right now, dahling. Town can't be 100% on all their reads. We're the uninformed majority. If we were 100% on our reads, we'd be the informed majority, making this game very easy. That was a way of saying that the people I had pointed out needed to speak... I'm not giving people a free pass to not participate. That's moronic. Why are you going through all of my posts and "asking me to enlighten you" on obvious shit that you would know if you paid half as much attention to the game as you do to me?? It's weird that you have made one of the most number of posts,17 posts, in Day 1 and your behaviour has been rather confusing. That's the reason why I have been asking for clarification. Now that you are asking me to back off is not helping anyone, especially yourself. That last paragraph there, aren't you part of the game as well? Asking me to look elsewhere other than yourself just pinged my scumdar even harder. Vote: Paris Shawty (Tamamono) And now for yet another edition of The Adventures of Romeo Barnaby... Tuesday 13 June 1993 1200Hrs. Lunch. Well, one can't always survive on cactus juice all day... I need meat I asked Sandman for the nearest life form and he gladly agreed to help. Five minutes later, Sandman returned with great news. He found a camel wandering aimlessly up north. Camel meat here I come!!! Sandman and I had a brilliant plan. We lured the camel to a quicksand pit and it drowned itself, flailing in the process. No more food worries for the next few days!!
Piratedave84 Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 No! Don't vote for me; it's not right to do so, I am a member of the council. Yesterday (RL) saw me VERY drunk (bachelor party!) for most of the day; I know it's no excuse but my posts had very little value an were composed while I was way too drunk. I thought my posts were hilarious at that time, I now realize tht it was pretty retarded but, hey what's done is done. I think I can be of great value to the town and I guarantee you that I will be more valuable in the future. I know people expect some answers or a defence but frankly I don't know what to say as I have no idea what I was thinking when I made those posts. We can all agree that my behavior of yesterday is not a reflection if my behavior in ANY of my previous games. I urge you not to lynch me today; I will understand if you choose to do so but please consider the above when choosing your vote. That being said: unvote: Carlisa Masinelli (endgame) I'll cure my hangover now and be back later.
CMP Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 Yesterday (RL) saw me VERY drunk (bachelor party!) for most of the day; I know it's no excuse but my posts had very little value an were composed while I was way too drunk. Sounds like an excuse to me. My vote stands.
Piratedave84 Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 Sounds like an excuse to me. My vote stands. Fair enough
Fred Daniel Yam Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 Hey! Don't look at me; scrutinize someone else! I am a member of the council! Oh! Look over here, someone misinterpreting what I said, (actually there are several of you who did that!). What I said was: - we will lynch town today; you're already doing a great job towards that goal in voting for me; keep it up! - you cannot pretend to analyse posts as nothing of value was said not do we have previous behaviour to analyse; I would love to see an in depth analysis of today's posts! - my usual policy on day one is to lynch a lurker; it's never paid off but frankly what else can we do? So you say there is no point in analysing since there's no value today but you'd love to see an analysis? And you think that lynching a lurker that could be town is an idea even though you say it has NEVER paid off? That has earned you my vote for nowVote: Brittney Alfredo (PirateDave84)
mostlytechnic Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 Still deciding who to vote for today, so I took a look at everyone's activity. Here's the totals as of this post: Character by Day 1 posts Ronald Montague darthpotato 5 Balthasar Jameson Kristel 5 Juliet Williamson CallMePie 7 Amanda Lazaro PsyKater 2 Laurence Adams purpearljellyblob 3 Danyelle DeFalco Adam 5 Janice Capulet Kadabra 2 Benvolio Roni Mencot 1 Brittney Alfredo Piratedave 6 Margret Pines Capt. Redblade 6 Alicia Pines LegoDad 6 Paris Shawty Tamamono 17 Tybalt Pearson Waterbrick Down 4 Melanie Detruccio mostlytechnic 9 Rosie Fettucini peanuts 5 Carlisa Masinelli Endgame 6 Romeo Barnaby Esurient 5 Eric Escalus Dannylonglegs 3 Abraham Petruzzi Fred Daniel Yam 4 Rocky Sniffles Capt Nemo 3 Know what stuck out to me? That benvolio dude. Besides drunk and naked, he popped in to make ONE post saying he needed to catch up before saying anyhting, and then never came back. So... from me: Vote: Benvolio Roni (Mencot) There's several others who haven't said much at ALL, so they're also on my radar as trying to hide. Well that sucked, it was a nice table layout until I actually submitted the post.
Piratedave84 Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 So you say there is no point in analysing since there's no value today but you'd love to see an analysis? And you think that lynching a lurker that could be town is an idea even though you say it has NEVER paid off? That has earned you my vote for now Vote: Brittney Alfredo (PirateDave84) You chose to ignore my most recent post or did you not read it at all!? You're piling on and taking advantage of the bandwagon forming and it's fine by me, it's an acceptable strategy for scum.
Tamamono Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 It's weird that you have made one of the most number of posts,17 posts, in Day 1 and your behaviour has been rather confusing. That's the reason why I have been asking for clarification. Now that you are asking me to back off is not helping anyone, especially yourself. That last paragraph there, aren't you part of the game as well? Asking me to look elsewhere other than yourself just pinged my scumdar even harder. Vote: Paris Shawty (Tamamono) *falsetto* So active people are naturally scum? The fact that I'm trying to help town means I'm trying to eat your brains??? Of course I'm asking you to stop. How would you like it if you were trying to be active and encourage people in town to actually think with their brains and then along comes some random guy (who, I remind you, has done literally nothing but tell bad stories and try to get me lynched) with a vendetta against you? You're literally picking at my words and turning everything against me when I'm one of the towniest townies here. You'd have a lot more luck trying to randomly incriminate someone else. At first I thought you might be scum trying to undermine me because you saw my attempts at actually being helpful as threatening. Now I'm thinking it's more along the lines of you just trying to piss me off. megabluck off. And no, my getting pissed at you is not a scumtell, it's a tell of someone who has had it up to here with your stupidity. Learn the difference. Yesterday (RL) saw me VERY drunk (bachelor party!) for most of the day; I know it's no excuse but my posts had very little value an were composed while I was way too drunk. I thought my posts were hilarious at that time, I now realize tht it was pretty retarded but, hey what's done is done. I think I can be of great value to the town and I guarantee you that I will be more valuable in the future. What's so hilarious about telling everyone to not do anything and just mindlessly lynch town???
TrumpetKing Posted July 28, 2013 Author Posted July 28, 2013 Vote Tally Brittney Alfredo (Piratedave84) - 5 (CallMePie, Tamamono, Endgame, Waterbrick Down, Kristel, Fred Daniel Yam) Melanie Detruccio (Mostlytechnic) - 2 (LegoDad, PsyKater) Paris Shawty (Tamamono) - 2 (Purpearljellyblob, Esurient) Benvolio Roni (Mencot) - (mostlytechnic) With 20 players, a majority of 11 votes are required to form a lynch. 4 Hours remain in the day.
LegoDad Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 Not a teammate (at least that I know of, cause we COULD both be town but I don't know anyone else's loyalties yet) or trying to take pressure off. I said something because that's all. Moving on... oh wait, I don't have anything else to move on to yet since nothing is happening. Drat. What about all the people we haven't heard much from ? starting to ping my scum-dar here... I also generally go after those that don't say squat, but I'm usually wrong. I have not followed up on early defenses, however, and they usually turn up scum. Which is why I'm on it this time like stink on manure. I agree with you that Melanie's idea sounds not-scum, but I disagree that her statement was a subtle defense. IMO, it's very rare for scum to openly communicate with their teammates, either in defense or offence on day one. I'm not as sure myself of your own Townyhood for bringing it up the way you did. This strikes me as a soft agreement with the Town consensus, setting yourself up for joining the bandwagon. Again, I disagree that a scum would do something like that. A scum's best chance to avoid suspicion on day one (and other days) is to avoid drawing ties between eachother, and communicating only to Townies. But again, why would a town do it? Why stick your neck out for someone that says something off? The only reason I can think of would be to take pressure off them, which would be the teammate sort of thing to do. Last things I'll say on the no lynch idea - statistically, it's solid. Makes for a boring game, but it DOES increase the odds of town winning. (at least having no lynch for the first day or two) See the second post here: http://forum.travian...ead.php?t=87580 Yeah, for those who think I was defending anyone, really, what was there to defend? You were defending that we were taking her statement wrong. She could have done that herself, no need to come in and say it for her. Just going to say that this post is scummy to my gut, scum are always trying to keep on everyone's nice side to avoid suspicion and this really seems like pandering to me, however, it's balanced out by her continual insistence on the boring no-lynch strategy. In order to keep on everyone's nice side scum try not to go out on a limb or stick out too much with crazy ideas or things that would be considered against the norm, case in point the no lynch strategy, so I'm still up in the air with you Melanie. Brittney's most recent statement doesn't fill me with a lot of confidence as she's basically recapped her original statement and slapped a vote on. I'm going to vote: Brittany Alfredo (Piratedave84) Now can we have some more lovely songs, Alicia? Ok, a song request. "Brittney got drunk, started talking aimlessly Now she returns, flailing shamelessly" "Do not vote for her She wildly exclaims She was drunk, and will make up for it She cautiously explains." "What are we to think? Should we believe her or not? Pretty sure this outfit Makes me looks damn hot" Holy crap, that's going to the top of the charts!
Tamamono Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 Brittney Alfredo (Piratedave84) - 6 (CallMePie, Tamamono, Endgame, Waterbrick Down, Kristel, Fred Daniel Yam) *falsetto* Fixed that for 'ya, hun. It doesn't look like we're getting a lynch. Bah. We're likely going to be in this situation again tomorrow. Let's hope one of our PRs can do something useful tonight, yes?
Captain Nemo Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 Well the moon is coming up and I’m running out of booze and patience. I ain’t be really confident in any of my scum tells so far, but there’s people who don’t sit with me right. I was more thinking that the situation with Britteny was just a town mess up, but my opinion on her changed as she done changed her reasons for her stupid mouth talks. There were problems with Melanie in the morn, but to me I think that was more of a town mess up with misunderstanding, so she’s not the townieness person to me, but I ain’t ready to noose er yet. While Britteny will be done getting my vote today, I also think there’s some other peoples to be lookin after. Paris don’t seem to sit well with me. She done seem to throw a hissy fit at people and get hugely defensive and rude when people ask her things or done question her allegiance. I ain’t ready to vote for her, but that gender confused man’s done pinged my attention. Vote: Brittney Alfredo (PirateDave84) Karen .0 Online Analyzing, Analyzing, Analyzing: “Well there’s only a few hours left, and it’s time to place my vote before it’s too late to. I’m not really confident in my scum suspects thus far, and frainly that’s not too surprising for day one, but I am now not so sure as I was previously with the alliegence of Britteny. Her switch-a-roo with her statements make me suspicious; since a townsperson should stick to their stories, lest they look like they’ve been silenced by their scum brothers. I’m not sure on the whole Melanie thing, but in my gut I feel it’s more of a town vs town problem, where infighting is getting the best of us; she’s still on my radar, but not on my vote today. I’ll be casting my vote for Britteny, but in the meantime I’m also not so sure on Paris. Personally I can see how scum could fake as active townies, but I also see who active townies can be seen as scum; however her rudeness and defensiveness does not sit well with me either way. She seems to explode on people who question her, and she uses her activeness as a shield to show she’s town—she doesn’t sit well with me thus far.”
Kadabra Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 Hey! Don't look at me; scrutinize someone else! I am a member of the council! Oh! Look over here, someone misinterpreting what I said, (actually there are several of you who did that!). What I said was: - we will lynch town today; you're already doing a great job towards that goal in voting for me; keep it up! - you cannot pretend to analyse posts as nothing of value was said not do we have previous behaviour to analyse; I would love to see an in depth analysis of today's posts! - my usual policy on day one is to lynch a lurker; it's never paid off but frankly what else can we do? I usually vote at random on day one but this time around I feel that pilling on a case which has very little substance is worthy of a vote. vote: Carlisa Masinelli (endgame) I think I should make clear that this is not an OMGUS vote but rather my opinion that piling on and then proceeding to not vote for me is scummy as hell. If you truly find my comments to be wack, then vote for me. You should do it now before the bandwagon picks up steam; it's easier for scum to hide if you vote early. Oh yeah! Oops! I did not see that with all my flailing and all! Did you literally say "don't look at me?" Girl, you dumb. Then you OMGUS vote while blatantly lying that it's not an OMGUS vote, justifying it with a statement that isn't even true. And then you're being sarcastic and whatnot. This is so defensive it hurts. No! Don't vote for me; it's not right to do so, I am a member of the council. Yesterday (RL) saw me VERY drunk (bachelor party!) for most of the day; I know it's no excuse but my posts had very little value an were composed while I was way too drunk. I thought my posts were hilarious at that time, I now realize tht it was pretty retarded but, hey what's done is done. I think I can be of great value to the town and I guarantee you that I will be more valuable in the future. I know people expect some answers or a defence but frankly I don't know what to say as I have no idea what I was thinking when I made those posts. We can all agree that my behavior of yesterday is not a reflection if my behavior in ANY of my previous games. I urge you not to lynch me today; I will understand if you choose to do so but please consider the above when choosing your vote. That being said: unvote: Carlisa Masinelli (endgame) I'll cure my hangover now and be back later. This is what I like to call 'realizing I'm dumb and trying desperately to backtrack'. The Unvote is just the cherry on top. Fair enough And here you're just being agreeable for the sake of being agreeable. Someone mentioned pandering before, here's a prime example. "You're voting for me, but instead of defending myself I'll just roll over and let you walk on me." You chose to ignore my most recent post or did you not read it at all!? You're piling on and taking advantage of the bandwagon forming and it's fine by me, it's an acceptable strategy for scum. Passive aggressive~ Finally, I would like to draw our attention to a statement made by Janice Capulet: It rubbed me the wrong way at the time (along with a couple other people after I pointed it out) and I would like to make sure we haven't swept it completely under the rug, as I do think it's worth addressing. To that effect, I say again what I say after she first made the above statement. At this point, I'm torn between Brittney and Janice, myself. I would like to know exactly what pinged you about it? If you're saying I think we shouldn't analyze, you'd be daft. I said that overthinking things like 'too much roleplaying', 'lurking', 'fluff posting', etc., is a good way to lynch Town D1. Analyzing and overthinking are almost opposites. With that said, I will proceed to Vote: Brittney Alfredo (Piratedave84) for the reasons I presented in my analysis above.
TrumpetKing Posted July 28, 2013 Author Posted July 28, 2013 (edited) Vote Tally Brittney Alfredo (Piratedave84) - 8 (CallMePie, Tamamono, Endgame, Waterbrick Down, Kristel, Fred Daniel Yam, Captain Nemo, Kadabra) Melanie Detruccio (Mostlytechnic) - 2 (LegoDad, PsyKater) Paris Shawty (Tamamono) - 2 (Purpearljellyblob, Esurient) Benvolio Roni (Mencot) - 1 (mostlytechnic) With 20 players, a majority of 11 votes are required to form a lynch. 3 Hours remain in the day. Edited July 28, 2013 by TrumpetKing
Adam Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 What I find strange is that, at least in my experience, Britt (Piratedave84) plays better than this. Defenses that devolve into "I was drunk, please don't vote for me!" and "Go ahead and vote for me, a scum of a bitch like you would do that," sound strange coming out of her mouth. I keep coming back to the thought that a scum team wouldn't let her flail around and post like that. That said, I've been screwed over too many times by foolishly thinking, "No scumbag would ever do something that scummy." I don't want to ignore a possible scum slip-up. Furthermore, the argument that Britt (Piratedave84) was drunk works against her as much, if not more, than it does for her. Wouldn't it be more likely for a scummo to slip up and say something like, "Don't analyze posts," when they are drunk, their judgement impaired? Whatever the case, Britt (Piratedave84) is the most suspicious person of the day. I shall vote: Brittney Alfredo (Piratedave84). Pants eagerly and rolls over, whispering, "Fire my loins..."
Mencot Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 Still deciding who to vote for today, so I took a look at everyone's activity. Here's the totals as of this post: Character by Day 1 posts Ronald Montague darthpotato 5 Balthasar Jameson Kristel 5 Juliet Williamson CallMePie 7 Amanda Lazaro PsyKater 2 Laurence Adams purpearljellyblob 3 Danyelle DeFalco Adam 5 Janice Capulet Kadabra 2 Benvolio Roni Mencot 1 Brittney Alfredo Piratedave 6 Margret Pines Capt. Redblade 6 Alicia Pines LegoDad 6 Paris Shawty Tamamono 17 Tybalt Pearson Waterbrick Down 4 Melanie Detruccio mostlytechnic 9 Rosie Fettucini peanuts 5 Carlisa Masinelli Endgame 6 Romeo Barnaby Esurient 5 Eric Escalus Dannylonglegs 3 Abraham Petruzzi Fred Daniel Yam 4 Rocky Sniffles Capt Nemo 3 Know what stuck out to me? That benvolio dude. Besides drunk and naked, he popped in to make ONE post saying he needed to catch up before saying anyhting, and then never came back. So... from me: Vote: Benvolio Roni (Mencot) There's several others who haven't said much at ALL, so they're also on my radar as trying to hide. Well that sucked, it was a nice table layout until I actually submitted the post. That is a good logic to vote for somebody fanciullesco... I did actually return, now. Okay (not ok-ey) 24 hours later but I did return What should I say, hmm not really getting into this thing, Bella Brittaney seems to get all the hate but that is no reason for me to vote for her because I have no clue. Melanie voting for me and also her strange game/voting logic, ala lets not vote is a bit off. So I am gonna go with her and make a better job getting up tomorrow Vote: Melanie Detruccio (Mostlytechnic Aha wrong voting pattern, missing ) Vote: Melanie Detruccio (Mostlytechnic)
Dannylonglegs Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 Needless to say, this day has been frustratingly fruitless. That said, it can be salvaged if we manage to get a Lynch in. At this point it's a bit too late to advocate the Lynch of one of those I'm genuinely suspicious of, such as Alicia, or Ronald. I think I'll vote for Alfredo. Not because I'm convinced he's scum, but because There's more to learn if we lynch him then if we don't. Sorry Alfredo. If you're scum, then I'm more inclined to believe that Paris, Juliet, Tybalt, and Carlisa are more likely Townies, since they played an important part in her Lynch. If She's a Townie, then there's likely a Scum in that list. I've been going through the posts today and looking at who's critical of whom and to what degree to see if I can discern who's not on a team with whom, due to the fact that I don't believe there's any reason for a scum to advocate another scum's lynch on day one. I'll Vote: Brittney Alfredo (Piratedave84) So that we can Lynch her and get an anchor in this hunt. I also suggest that anyone not voting Alfredo right now who's online change to Alfredo so that we get this crucial anchor and not have a lynchless day one.
TrumpetKing Posted July 28, 2013 Author Posted July 28, 2013 Vote Tally Brittney Alfredo (Piratedave84) - 10 (CallMePie, Tamamono, Endgame, Waterbrick Down, Kristel, Fred Daniel Yam, Captain Nemo, Kadabra, Adam, Dannylonglegs) Melanie Detruccio (Mostlytechnic) - 3 (LegoDad, PsyKater, Mencot) Paris Shawty (Tamamono) - 2 (Purpearljellyblob, Esurient) Benvolio Roni (Mencot) - 1 (mostlytechnic) With 20 players, a majority of 11 votes are required to form a lynch. 2.5 Hours remain in the day.
Recommended Posts