Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ohhh, I was watching an episode of SB to have another look at Miss Puff Boating School and this can make a fantastic set if they do the house and especially the lighthouse 8-

Posted
I know the pic is kinda small.

And so is the set. At least it seems small. The picture does not really give much away. But it looks like a very small Hogwarts (compared to older Hogwarts sets). -- Bryan

Posted
It looks alright I guess, but it's too small. You can see a black skeleton horse with wings in the pic.

Yeah, you are right it does look kinda small, but I think that I will make a nice add-on to the second version of the hogwarts, cause they are build in similar style, with gray bricks at the bottom and tan bricks for the top floors of the buildings

Posted

im really not liking this one..

looks too bulky..

and very small...

and its basicly one tower...

the other hogwarts looked very nice compared to this one..

hope this is a pro-pro-pro-prototype...otherwise *n*

Posted

Man that's too small, it looks rather lumpy, and poor. I like the one from the third book better....

hope this is a pro-pro-pro-prototype...otherwise *n*

Yes let's hope it's a prototype...

Posted

Thank you fo this interesting find, Christian. I thought TLG would abandon Harry this year, with the lack of stets last year, the lack news this year, and the huge abundance of new sets this year. After all, the 5th book is pretty sucky.

I too think it is chunky compared to the previous Hogwarts sets but compared to the movie it's fine.

Front Page, I say!

Posted

For the Hogwart castle, I prefer the second one. The new one will be a nice addition to it, but too small to pretend to be a castle for me. Maybe we will have some other castle parts, but I don't think when you know the story (the action is more outside of the castle).

Nice for the SB sets! Just hope that we will not have to wait one year to see them in Europe... And a Miss Puff minifig, that sounds cool! I think that the two sets will be nice, because I was septic the firts time I read here from some SB sets, and TLC have made a very cool stuf with them.

Posted

this is definately a prototype because look at dumbledore. its the old minifig of dumbledore, why would they use the old one when they have a perfectly good new version to look like michael gambon.

Posted

Its definately not as good as the previous Hogwarts castles, however, it does look like a prototype pic. As for its size, it does look like its four "storeys" tall I think its just look small on the pic. I will buy this set for sure either way.

Posted

Well, it definitely looks like a wing of the castle has been chopped off in this photo (to the right). I'm not jumping to conclusions just yet. Still, it does seem odd that there is only one set this year, given the upcoming release of the film. As a parts pack, this castle looks pretty decent. I'm still curious as to what the other wing of the castle looks like (assuming there is one).

Posted

Thanks for the pic, Christian.

It seems pretty craptastic to me. I think it definitely has to be a prototype but where did it come from? Correct me if I'm wrong but there aren't three 'l's in castillo? Are there?

I think it has potential, especially if it's just a prototype. I love the gabled roof above the door and all of the arches used. However, why is there a small cone on the highest tower? It also seems to be like an hp castle sandwich with non-ornate black roofs separating each level. After seeing the new castle line I know TLG can do better that this. I hope this is a prototype and would love to see the finished product.

Posted

This really had better be a prototype...it's just so horrible if it isn't. I mean...it's so small, for a castle? This set in previous incarnations has been huge.

*waits and prays this isn't anywhere near the final version*

Though...prototypes rarely change much in size or complexity...

Posted

I have a special request for everyone:

Can we please stop making statements like this one:

"Hey! I have huge news about LEGO. But, I'm sworn to secrecy, so I can't tell you what it is. But I can tell you it's HUGE and it's going to blow everyone's mind!!" ?

Isn't there a saying that goes "If you can't say anything about inside information, don't say anything at all."?

Seriously, some of you people would never be hired by the CIA.

;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) <--indicates humor >:-( <--indicates truth in jest.

Posted
I have a special request for everyone:

Can we please stop making statements like this one:

"Hey! I have huge news about LEGO. But, I'm sworn to secrecy, so I can't tell you what it is. But I can tell you it's HUGE and it's going to blow everyone's mind!!" ?

Isn't there a saying that goes "If you can't say anything about inside information, don't say anything at all."?

Errr.....Are you posting in the correct thread? Who said they had news but couldn't share it?

EDIT; Ah, your're refering to Alex's comment, right? I belive that he was trying to use the saying "I couldn't have said it better myself" or something along the lines of that, but he instinctively used French syntax.

Posted
Errr.....Are you posting in the correct thread? Who said they had news but couldn't share it?

I think he just means in general ;-)

-l2k-

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...