aczkasow Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 Hi everyone! This is my first attempt to build a gearbox. Being a newbie I have noted there are only one type of gear which could be coupled with a driving ring. So I decided to find a workaround for this issue (I bet i've seen this idea on this forum). The idea is to use two not connected half-axels with a driving ring in the middle, the synchroniser’s home axle syncs standard synchro-gear, while the floating half-axel uses any other gear and could be coupled with a synchroniser with help of a standard bush (which has notches on one side to couple). - There are some cons to that approach: half axels have to be precisely aligned. - Sometimes it is impossible to switch the gear when motor is turned off. What do you think? Quote
Paul Boratko Posted July 13, 2012 Posted July 13, 2012 I played around with an idea similar to this a few years ago and it is just too unstable to be consistently reliable... Also, one of the keys I've found to building a really great working gearbox concept is keeping everything uniform using Liftarms rather than perpendicular connectors on axles because they have a tendency to move around and cause gear bind ups, plus they are not "true" to the spacing in which the gears work the best... Quote
aczkasow Posted July 13, 2012 Author Posted July 13, 2012 I am yet to figure out how could I create half-stud displacement with studless liftarms, that's the reason why I decided to use axles and perpendicular connectors. Still have issues wuth basic connections (like: how to create a studless cage with 8 liftarms?). Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.