Jump to content
Eurobricks Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I have found that the far majority of the ships built are made using mostly brown/reddish brown plates for the decks. However, while doing some research for my current ship, I noticed that, surprisingly, for ships from the 17th century and after that the usual deck colour would be something between dark tan and tan.

In case this being truth, is there a reason for reddish brown being preferred to tan in terms of historical accuracy?

Edited by Frank Brick Wright
Posted (edited)

I think it's a matter of availability of certain colors in ones' collection.

Btw, I'm working on two ships of war, both with light gray decks, I don't use tan because I want to save those parts for other creations such as islands (sand), other builders might have the same reason for not using tan on ship decks.

I suppose the most obvious alternative is brown, I used a lot of black on my older ships but that wasn't a very good idea because it makes the ship look dark and hides many details.

Edited by Sebeus Iniwum
Posted

I prefer to use tan for decks where I can. i find the lighter color seem more like a man-of-war's deck, holy stoned and swabbed daily. I find white or light gray can have a similar effect.

Posted

Yes, I am with Kurigan and Sebeus here. While I think tan to be the most accurate they also tend to be the most expensive. The brown colours work quite well and can be got at with a trifle less time and money.

At the same time I think it's important to plan the deck colour(s) so that things placed in, on and around it are offset so as to be easily visible in pictures. A ship I'm currently working on will have brown decking (although tan would be more accurate) because a lot of the "paint trim" on the ship is already tan.

Moral of the story: If you want tan and can afford and find it (and it looks good/fits the build) then I think you should get it. :pir-classic:

Posted

Yes, I guess tan's price is a counter reason for using it… pirate_sceptic.gif I think a good option would be, in general, to build interior decks with brown (like gun's deck) and top decks with tan, since it requires fewer tan parts and seeing a tan stripe in the side of a black ship is weird. And surely lots of tan gets weird too because the ships starts looking too light and clean

Posted

I like to use tan usually, It depends on the ship. Brown goes well with dark colours, and tan goes well with lighter colours. Of course contrast look nice.

However this is a question of historical accuracy, and most ships I have been on and seen use tan, or dark tan. I prefer tan anyway.

:jollyroger:

Posted

Dark tan seems most appropriate to me, as you can imagine decks get wet and dirty and this gets into the wood. A daily scrub will not prevent this completely. Tan is second best, but it looks like freshly cut wood. Reddish brown or dark brown is great for well aged decks. Light grey is my least favourite, but still looks OK imo.

Posted

Dark tan is definitively better… But is extremely rare and pricy pirate_sceptic.gif I feel the same as you about tan, it does give a brand-new look to a ship, though I feel that if it applies to a XVIII century ship it is pretty decent, because ships of these period used to be far more cleaner than their precedents. I guess, however, that for a galleon or an old ship, as you stated, brown would be better.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...