A blue/yellow tank...thing

[Aju]

For my first post on these forums, I would like to show off a semi-old Moc of mine.

Here is the link to the gallery:

Here

I did not use SNOT, but it still looks good.

[Chuck]

Too blocky, the gun is tiny, too tall, and the color scheme isn't that great. You should try using SNOT, though.

-l2k-

[SuvieD]

Simple but somewhat lacking.

I like the color scheme but the black seems kind of blotchy. I also dislike the stickers. Personal preference though. I would switch the guns for brick built ones or at least black in the same piece. You may want to rework the movement for the guns as they don't shoot up which is actually very odd for a tank. You may also want to add more wheels as it is more like a big armored jeep and not as sturdy as a more typical tank would be.

Obviously an older MOC as you mentioned so rework may not happen but in future things to maybe keep in mind. I like the colors and the compact size though and the parts usage is nice also. If you rebuild, post a picture so we can see your improvements.

[vahkimetru]

I like it a lot actually. The only thing it needs is a bit more of a detailed interior. If you don't use SNOT, you could always use curved bricks.

[Chuck]

I like it a lot actually. The only thing it needs is a bit more of a detailed interior. If you don't use SNOT, you could always use curved bricks.

Using the Snot technique makes things look better and realistic. Using curved peices dosn't really change it.

-l2k-

[vahkimetru]

Alot can still be achived with the right assortment of curved bricks. SNOT actually makes things harder, plus, you need more specialized parts, but with curved bricks, you can easily get them. Though I do see what you mean lego2000. I mean, what would the UCS ISD be without SNOT?

Oh, I also need a list of LEGO fan terms. I know MOC and SNOT, but I need to know others.

[Chuck]

Alot can still be achived with the right assortment of curved bricks. SNOT actually makes things harder, plus, you need more specialized parts, but with curved bricks, you can easily get them. Though I do see what you mean lego2000. I mean, what would the UCS ISD be without SNOT?

Oh, I also need a list of LEGO fan terms. I know MOC and SNOT, but I need to know others.

Snot isnt that hard. It's not as if it takes years of practice, look at me for example. Snot pwnz.

-l2k-

[Starwars4J]

While a valuable technique, I think it's getting overrated, as if nothing of merit can be built without some SNOT. That's not the case, you only need SNOT if you're going for certain looks, others look fine sans SNOT.

[Kikuichimonji]

Oh, I also need a list of LEGO fan terms. I know MOC and SNOT, but I need to know others.

Go here.

[blueandwhite]

While a valuable technique, I think it's getting overrated, as if nothing of merit can be built without some SNOT. That's not the case, you only need SNOT if you're going for certain looks, others look fine sans SNOT.

SNOT is simply another tool in the average LEGO builder's arsenal. Where appropriate, it may allow for greater detailing, making your MOCs more striking. I have rarely, if ever seen a truly great builder who doesn't use SNOT extensively. Its use may not be obvious, but that is only a testament to the quality of the MOC. Using SNOT is not about creating a specific asthetic; its about enhancing detail where appropriate.

In short, SNOT is NOT overrated.

Later.

[Zarkan]

I kind of like it actually. The front could use some work, but the overall shape is interesting. I hope to see more from you. ;-)

[Starwars4J]

While a valuable technique, I think it's getting overrated, as if nothing of merit can be built without some SNOT. That's not the case, you only need SNOT if you're going for certain looks, others look fine sans SNOT.

SNOT is simply another tool in the average LEGO builder's arsenal. Where appropriate, it may allow for greater detailing, making your MOCs more striking. I have rarely, if ever seen a truly great builder who doesn't use SNOT extensively. Its use may not be obvious, but that is only a testament to the quality of the MOC. Using SNOT is not about creating a specific asthetic; its about enhancing detail where appropriate.

In short, SNOT is NOT overrated.

Later.

This is where I disagree. I believe a great builder can make somehing "great" using even simple pieces, with or without SNOT. And calling the use of SNOT as the only testament to the quality of a MOC? So a MOC can't be of high quality unless it uses that technique? Sure, it may look nice when used appropriately, but it isn't necessary. It's the "in" thing so-to-speak, where every MOC "needs" it to be good, but the true testament to the quality of a MOC is different for everyone. I'm sure there are plenty of MOCs that you'd like, that I think are not that great, and vice-versa. The only thing a MOC "needs" to be great is a good builder. SNOT is a tool, a tool that may or may not be used to create a quality MOC. I think the statement that you "need" SNOT to have a quality MOC speaks for it being overrated itself ;-)

[blueandwhite]

This is where I disagree. I believe a great builder can make somehing "great" using even simple pieces, with or without SNOT. And calling the use of SNOT as the only testament to the quality of a MOC? So a MOC can't be of high quality unless it uses that technique? Sure, it may look nice when used appropriately, but it isn't necessary. It's the "in" thing so-to-speak, where every MOC "needs" it to be good, but the true testament to the quality of a MOC is different for everyone. I'm sure there are plenty of MOCs that you'd like, that I think are not that great, and vice-versa. The only thing a MOC "needs" to be great is a good builder. SNOT is a tool, a tool that may or may not be used to create a quality MOC. I think the statement that you "need" SNOT to have a quality MOC speaks for it being overrated itself ;-)

I never said that great builders use SNOT exclusively, or that SNOT was absolutely essential. And where in my post did I ever state that SNOT was the be-all and end-all to MOCing? I simply stated that it is an invaluable tool utilized by most good builders to add additional detailing to their work. What makes a MOC great is how well the builder utilizes his or her otherwise ordinary bricks to make something that is extraordinary!

You can call SNOT overrated if you like, but it doesn't make it any less valuable.

Later.

[Starwars4J]

I have rarely, if ever seen a truly great builder who doesn't use SNOT extensively. Its use may not be obvious, but that is only a testament to the quality of the MOC.

That's where I got the impression you were calling the be-all and end-all, because that's what was heavily implied. I'm not trying to say that it isn't a valuable technique, I'm just saying that it seems like people make things more complicated with snot, that they could do without it just to have SNOT and say they used it.

Like I said though, I use SNOT sometimes (it's more valuable in space MOCs, and less so in my castle MOCs), but I just see it as the "in-thing".

[The Hordesman]

Hmm, looks Swede-y.

the two things I react on is that the visor is poking out, and that the turret now has two holes on its back, can easily be filled by a 1x2 piece.

Now, mass 'em!

[Aju]

Well, I finally got around to fixing the tank some more. All I did was make the gun be able to shoot up and down and a minifigure can sit up there.

Pics can be seen here.

[Dino_Bot]

it reminds me of Plasmic Tank. I made it 5 years ago. It has a similar build, just a lot more colors, lol.

Its somewhat bigger.

I like your Tank, its purdy.

*yoda*