Sandy Posted December 31, 2009 Posted December 31, 2009 Okay, so Mr. Willis has gotten some of you doubtful. I respect that, and see that even though he clearly is hiding something, he might not be a Mafia after all. On the other hand, this might be just a scheme, and we won't know it until the end. I just find it very odd that he has contacted the nurse in private, but not me, even though I've been on his case the strongest. It is usually a Mafia habit of trying to influence the more inexperienced players... Anyway, unvote: Robbie Willis/WhiteFang However, he is not the only one I have strong suspicions about. For almost all the same reasons as Mr. Willis, I will vote: Dr. Wilkerson/Ricecracker. He was very keen to spread confusion earlier today, but after I started accusing Mr. Willis, he suddenly fell silent (as if to say, "my job for today is done"). People, I know you are desperate for more concrete evidence, but it seems nobody is willing to give you any. I can't help you with that, so I can only go with what I've been given. If you don't want to follow my vote, I understand that, but right now nobody's giving any other suggestions on who to vote, either. I am confident we can find the rats among us, if we just keep pushing. Don't give up yet!
MagPiesRUs Posted December 31, 2009 Posted December 31, 2009 However, he is not the only one I have strong suspicions about. For almost all the same reasons as Mr. Willis, I will vote: Dr. Wilkerson/Ricecracker.He was very keen to spread confusion earlier today, but after I started accusing Mr. Willis, he suddenly fell silent (as if to say, "my job for today is done"). People, I know you are desperate for more concrete evidence, but it seems nobody is willing to give you any. I can't help you with that, so I can only go with what I've been given. If you don't want to follow my vote, I understand that, but right now nobody's giving any other suggestions on who to vote, either. Just like Mr. Willis, I don't see how Dr. Wilkerson is spreading confusion. All he's done is say that he knows for a fact there are 3 killers. If anything, he's trying to clarify things for us. As I've said already, he wouldn't benefit from lying about something like that, because if we discovered later there were only 2 killers, he'd be toast. The only other thing he's done is call you out, which is by no means grounds to kill someone. And as I've said before, more is lost from a poorly thought out vote than from no vote at all. We don't have to convict someone every day if we have no good reason to do so. I just remembered what the Governor said today too: "Be very wise with your voting today, if you vote poorly, there may be consequences." he said.
Bob Posted December 31, 2009 Author Posted December 31, 2009 Just under 48 Hours Remain. Vote Count: Robbie Willis / Whitefang: 5 (JimButcher, Dannylonglegs, Quarryman, Millacol88, Hewkii9) Dr. Ernie Wilkerson / Ricecracker: 1 (Sandy) The Governor stands up again. "The National Guardsmen are telling me that everyone is confined indoors today, so no Night Actions may be performed." All Night Actions Will Be Useless Tonight!
Big Cam Posted December 31, 2009 Posted December 31, 2009 He was very keen to spread confusion earlier today, but after I started accusing Mr. Willis, he suddenly fell silent (as if to say, "my job for today is done"). it is common knowledge umongst the town people WHY (<<link) he fell silent, and this should not be held against him. I understand how he may seem a little supsicious having read all of your acusations but I still feel they are only acusations and I'm not willing to have another townie's death on my hands. Until more concrete evedince is produced, I will not be voting, and I am shocked that my fellow officers would vote so carelessly, we need to learn from our mistakes.
Quarryman Posted December 31, 2009 Posted December 31, 2009 it is common knowledge umongst the town people WHY (<<link) he fell silent, and this should not be held against him. Ahem, you're referring to Mr. Willis there, while the DA was referring to Dr. Wilkerson I believe. And Dr. Wilkerson has been spreading confusion, intended or not, his claims have been sufficiently strange to cause lots of confusion. And that is enough for me. Unvote: Robbie Willis / Whitefang. Vote: Dr. Wilkerson / Ricecracker.
Millacol88 Posted December 31, 2009 Posted December 31, 2009 Unvote: Robbie Willis/Whitefang Vote: Wilkerso/Ricecracker If not Willis, thwn it's been you spreading the most confusion. Your talk of a neutral killer does not match up with what we know has happened during the night, yet you still insist you're right, but won't explain why. Should be Wilkerson, not Wilkerso.
Ricecracker Posted December 31, 2009 Posted December 31, 2009 He was very keen to spread confusion earlier today, but after I started accusing Mr. Willis, he suddenly fell silent (as if to say, "my job for today is done"). I have not spread any confusion, I merely stated a fact that I know and accused you . Really it's been you who's been causing the confusion. I stated what I knew and what I thought in a simple manner, and you went out of your way to debate it and quarrel with me, all the while, you've been the one to confuse people with with your debates and arguing what I know. And Dr. Wilkerson has been spreading confusion, intended or not, his claims have been sufficiently strange to cause lots of confusion. And that is enough for me. I'd like you to reconsider what you've said, and maybe consider that it wasn't me, it was in fact the DA. If not Willis, thwn it's been you spreading the most confusion. Your talk of a neutral killer does not match up with what we know has happened during the night, yet you still insist you're right, but won't explain why. Again, how have I been the one causing confusion? And my theories make perfect sense. If you want to ignore them, that is your problem.
Dannylonglegs Posted December 31, 2009 Posted December 31, 2009 Unvote: Robbie Willis/Whitefang I feel that, instead of being schum, he's some kind of special townie. Despite being strongly opposed to Dr. Wilkerson, I will not vote him to death, unless in his next few replies he does something to arouse my suspicion. Right now, I'm pretty convinced that he is either the vigilante or the serial killer, as he "Knew" that there were three killers. That said you may rebuke that a serial killer is just as dangerous as the mafia, but people, one man is surly weaker then a group of scheming, and conniving schum bags! I will wait for an accusation for someone I truly believe is a threat before voting, unless I am convinced otherwise! If he does turn out to be some kind of schum, then I have made a grave mistake.
Big Cam Posted December 31, 2009 Posted December 31, 2009 Ahem, you're referring to Mr. Willis there, while the DA was referring to Dr. Wilkerson I believe. And Dr. Wilkerson has been spreading confusion, intended or not, his claims have been sufficiently strange to cause lots of confusion. And that is enough for me. Unvote: Robbie Willis / Whitefang. Vote: Dr. Wilkerson / Ricecracker. You are correct, I misunderstood the good DA.
Quarryman Posted December 31, 2009 Posted December 31, 2009 Again, how have I been the one causing confusion? And my theories make perfect sense. If you want to ignore them, that is your problem. Your theories caused quite a bit of confusion, surely you can see that? As for how you can know.. Investigator, for one. No, technically there's no way an investigator could learn things about three people in just two nights. Same goes for some kind of peeping tom or reporter. So the only way I can see for you to know for a fact that we have three killers in our town. and not be scum would be if you're either a vigilante or serial killer, and either was blocked or didn't use your ability last night. So which one is it? (you may tell me in private if you prefer, but for the time being my vote stands)
JimBee Posted December 31, 2009 Posted December 31, 2009 Unvote: Robert Wills (psst, it's Wills, not Willis) Mr. Right knows what he's doing, and that's all we can go on now. "Concrete" evidence rarely comes by in these games... of life at all, nobody's going to just shout out their role. So suspicions and observations of patterns and such are all we have to go on. I hope some of you realize this before it's too late. Yes, jumping on the bandwagon and convicting someone "just to get something done" is not always the best option, but like Mr. Right said, no one else is providing clues or evidence pointing towards someone else. You ask for concrete evidence? Then return the favor by explaining why you refuse to help, yet you have no evidence on someone else. Vote: Wilkerson/ Ricecracker Addit: Whoops, sorry, it is Willis. In another mystery... of life, there is someone named Wills. Addit: Whoops, sorry, it is Willis. In another mystery... of life, there is someone named Wills.
Ricecracker Posted December 31, 2009 Posted December 31, 2009 Mr. Right knows what he's doing, and that's all we can go on now. And how, may I ask, do you know this? Also, you haven't said why you're voting for me... Just 'cause?
JimBee Posted December 31, 2009 Posted December 31, 2009 And how, may I ask, do you know this? Also, you haven't said why you're voting for me... Just 'cause? Do you have a better argument, mister? I did say why I voted for you- I'm going on what Mr. Right is saying, and I believe that it is true. If you've got a problem with it, do something.
Ricecracker Posted December 31, 2009 Posted December 31, 2009 I did say why I voted for you- I'm going on what Mr. Right is saying, and I believe that it is true. If you've got a problem with it, do something. You did not say why you voted for me. You just spent two paragraphs saying why you think we should at all today.
simonjedi Posted December 31, 2009 Posted December 31, 2009 (edited) Vote: Dr. Wilkerson / Ricecracker. Edited December 31, 2009 by simonjedi
Ricecracker Posted December 31, 2009 Posted December 31, 2009 Vote: Dr. Wilkerson / Ricecracker. Umm....Why? You're just going to vote because other people do?
Bob Posted December 31, 2009 Author Posted December 31, 2009 Vote Count: Robbie Willis / Whitefang: 1 ( Hewkii9) Dr. Ernie Wilkerson / Ricecracker: 5 (Sandy, Quarryman, Millacol88, JimButcher, Simonjedi)
MagPiesRUs Posted December 31, 2009 Posted December 31, 2009 You're right, we need to vote someone off today. We won't be getting any more information tonight with no night actions, so tomorrow we'll be in the same situation as we are now if we don't vote. I'm still not convinced about voting off Dr. Wilkerson though, for reasons I've already stated. It seems clear to me he has an important night action for the town.
Inconspicuous Posted December 31, 2009 Posted December 31, 2009 I think that Mr. Wilkerson is innocent too, but who else are we going to vote off? Mr. Right has been accusing these two, but we can't tell if he is right unless we vote one of them off, and most people seem to believe him. If anyone has any suspicions to voice, please do so. Especially you quiet ones who haven't been participating too much.
The Crazy One Posted December 31, 2009 Posted December 31, 2009 I shall vote: Dr. Ernie Wilkerson / Ricecracker He has always been suspicious to me, and he is very unhelpful, and has been constantly hindering, or stirring up trouble. Sounds like scum to me.
Ricecracker Posted December 31, 2009 Posted December 31, 2009 Listen people! Listen to what you're doing! You're voting someone off because they're suspicious of someone else. And don't give me the megablocks-excuse that you're just following Mr. Right, because he must be right. Since I'll be voted off if I don't do anything, I'll reveal how I know how there are three killers. I am the loyal town vigilante. I killed Lois on night one because many people thought she was suspicious of her. Last night, I was blocked from killing. Listen to me, I'm telling the truth. In light of everything I've said, I'm going to Vote: Sandy/Mr. Right
Big Cam Posted December 31, 2009 Posted December 31, 2009 This town has no place for a murder of innocent Townies Vote: Dr. Wilkerson/Ricecracker
Ricecracker Posted December 31, 2009 Posted December 31, 2009 This town has no place for a murder of innocent TowniesVote: Dr. Wilkerson/Ricecracker What!? Because I acted on the suspicions of town members, you're voting me off? Say that again when I'm dead in the morning.
Inconspicuous Posted December 31, 2009 Posted December 31, 2009 This town has no place for a murder of innocent TowniesVote: Dr. Wilkerson/Ricecracker You're wiling to vote off the vigilante because they followed OUR suspicions? Are you crazy? You're looking awfully scumlike to me officer. Mr. Right, you've been a snake bathing in the light the whole time. You've been subtly casting suspicion on others, and claiming that others have been causing chaos. You claim that you're not Mafia because you're clearly demonstrating your thoughts. I suspect you're hiding in plain sight. You've been encouraging us to vote so we will vote off a townie. You've been acting along the whole time. Even if you haven't blatantly lied, you've been misguiding all of us, and making sure you get your way. You always tell us that you're voting with you're gut. Now, I'm voting with my gut by: Vote: Matthew Right/Sandy
Big Cam Posted January 1, 2010 Posted January 1, 2010 You're wiling to vote off the vigilante because they followed OUR suspicions? Are you crazy? You're looking awfully scumlike to me officer.Mr. Right, you've been a snake bathing in the light the whole time. You've been subtly casting suspicion on others, and claiming that others have been causing chaos. You claim that you're not Mafia because you're clearly demonstrating your thoughts. I suspect you're hiding in plain sight. You've been encouraging us to vote so we will vote off a townie. You've been acting along the whole time. Even if you haven't blatantly lied, you've been misguiding all of us, and making sure you get your way. You always tell us that you're voting with you're gut. Now, I'm voting with my gut by: Vote: Matthew Right/Sandy Excuse me? Unless the townsfolk agree with a majority no one is to be eliminated by the city of Stapleton. No citizen has the right to take the law into their own hands. What if this vigilante decided to kill robbie willis because we were at one point suspicious? He is not the voice of this city, nor the executor. The city will vote and decide, not allow one man to do as he pleases. For all we know he's a vigilante but also affiliated with the mob. We don't know, but we do know he's killing people. You know, you sound awfully suspicious standing up for an admitted killer, don't think that is going unnoticed.
Recommended Posts