Dragonator Posted August 12, 2008 Author Posted August 12, 2008 Again, since he didn't do a night action, I didn't hit him, but I hit Quarryman/Michael... what's up with that? Do you think there's something to that? Who I hit and who I don't hit?...I don't know what to believe at this point... No comment. There are many mysteries in this game, Roto-Rooters is just having a hard time seeing most of them, which is probably why he keeps verbally abusing me. I just can't take it any more! Besides, if I told you everything, what would be the fun in that?
Hinckley Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 No comment. There are many mysteries in this game, Roto-Rooters is just having a hard time seeing most of them, which is probably why he keeps verbally abusing me. I just can't take it any more! Besides, if I told you everything, what would be the fun in that? I'm not asking you! Shut up and let my post sit there so people can read it. It's important.
Dragonator Posted August 12, 2008 Author Posted August 12, 2008 I'm not asking you! Shut up and let my post sit there so people can read it. It's important. Your so mean to me. Anyway, I won't shut up ! I own this tread! I have rights you know!! I defy you!!! That's probably not a good idea. No your right, I apologise. Please don't hurt me... You know I think you should shut up too. Well said! Fine. Oh wait, one last thing. I just got this weird note: Your face is not asking you! How odd. It doesn't even make sense.
Hinckley Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 How odd. It doesn't even make sense. Neither one of our faces even makes sense. And since I believe I've now knocked it off the page and it bears repeating, here's a replay: So my question to Rotrigous is, would you be willing to spend the night with Kyle? or alone so Kyle could investigate you? Last time I followed him and tried to block his night actions, I was told: "Last night you followed Rotrigous. As stated in his final post, he did indeed make his way to the rooms of Mary the maid, and spent the night entertaining her. You do however have a suspicion that he was not just there to enjoy himself, and that it was not a coincidence that he had spent the night with Mary on many an occasion. Despite this, he did not get up to anything that required you to take action, so you settled down comfortably and awaited the dawn…" Again, since he didn't do a night action, I didn't hit him, but I hit Quarryman/Michael... what's up with that? Do you think there's something to that? Who I hit and who I don't hit?... I don't know what to believe at this point...
Shadows Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 If I didn't want to be investigated, and found to be a traitor, and my night action was to choose a person to spend the night with, Then I would always make sure I was with someone other than an investigator!So my question to Rotrigous is, would you be willing to spend the night with Kyle? or alone so Kyle could investigate you? It's creative thinking, but it won't work, as a matter of fact, it might interfere. The first night, before we had any clue what we were doing, I chose Calvin randomly, and he chose to investigate me. It's the only possible reason he didn't manage to finish my investigation properly. Somehow, my night action interfered with his, maybe because I was watching him, thus keeping him from doing what he needed to do freely. As a result, if Kyle comes back with any result but inconclusive, just as Calvin did, he's lying. How would that help? Sure, it would confirm to me that he's either a mercenary or traitor, but how would I prove that to you, aside from my experience with Calvin? Just in the interest of openness, here is a general summary of the rest of my night actions. Initially, I chose who to protect based on their activity the previous day. If they seemed to anger anyone enough that they could become a target, I protected them. I protected the Friar one night, but not the night of his possibly-attempted murder. After the failed attempt and his unwillingness to vote for the person who actually did it, I didn't see any point in protecting him again. I protected Lord Savril once and literally never heard a word about it except that nothing happened. And he snores. I was locked in with Byron one night, which nearly drove me to murder, but provided no information except that he never shuts up. I actually began to wonder if he was the other investigator at one point. In the end, how can we be sure that what someone claims as their role really is? Calvin was stupid to admit his early, the second investigator wouldn't be so dumb, but Byron has certainly played Columbo throughout this whole thing. On the other hand, if I was a traitor and understood the game well enough (past playing experiences and such), I would consider claiming to be an investigator and then name all the traitors as loyalists. Quite a good cover... I spent a series of nights with Mary, since it was at least entertaining. That included the night that Grim died outside her room. I'm fairly sure she has no night actions, but have no idea about her loyalties. She doesn't snore though. For my last night action, I tried using my protecting skills to see if I could investigate/follow someone, Lady Suzanne, the night before the day we voted to execute her. I figured I might be able to actually learn something, but didn't. It was a completely uneventful night. Which leads me to something else. Kyle claims he witnessed me and her in an intimate situation, yet the reality is, nothing happened that night at all (some may recall my mention of just how boring she was). Draggy made that very clear, which means he wouldn't have told him anything else. Sometimes I wonder why people want to make up details that didn't occur, unless it's to try to make their story sound believable when it isn't. Since then, I haven't done any night actions, as they weren't producing results. That said... I want this dealt with, but no one is up to it. So fine, you people can pick the daily loyalist to kill and I won't change my vote. Mercenaries are bad, whoever they work for: they misdirect us, split our votes and we kill the wrong people, like Fred. Whatever the case, tomorrow we can argue over whether to trust his 'results'.
Stauder Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 Hey everyone, IS has come up with the formula to epic lines! Something Something Game... of life. Well that sure was original. Also, when there are no traitors left how will you know? I mean for all you know they are all gone alredy, and you are just here for our entertainment. Squigglesplusborck indeed...
Hinckley Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 Hey everyone, IS has come up with the formula to epic lines!Something Something Game... of life. Well that sure was original. Also, when there are no traitors left how will you know? I mean for all you know they are all gone alredy, and you are just here for our entertainment. Squigglesplusborck indeed... Voat: Strawder
Shadows Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 Despite this, he did not get up to anything that required you to take action, so you settled down comfortably and awaited the dawn…"[/b][/i]Again, since he didn't do a night action, I didn't hit him, but I hit Quarryman/Michael... what's up with that? Do you think there's something to that? Who I hit and who I don't hit?... I don't know what to believe at this point... The point is that I did a night action, protecting, but I wasn't doing anything bad that required you to try to stop me. It looks like you don't automatically stop all night actions, you stop harmful ones, which is what I think you're starting to realise as well. If that's the case, Quarryman/Michael had to be up to something that you actually needed to stop, which you did. Taken a step further, if that's the case, Kyle is lying.
Hinckley Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 The point is that I did a night action, protecting, but I wasn't doing anything bad that required you to try to stop me. It looks like you don't automatically stop all night actions, you stop harmful ones, which is what I think you're starting to realise as well. If that's the case, Quarryman/Michael had to be up to something that you actually needed to stop, which you did. Taken a step further, if that's the case, Kyle is lying. I had thought about that but since you two were on eachother and I was told you and Mary could be up to something, I'm just kind of sitting back. I thought about the fact that Michael and Kyle are both lying, but a King has to trust his executioner...I'd be surprised if he were a traitor-you on the other admit to wanting the power of the throne. I don't know. I never thought you were a traitor before, but I may vote for you anyway since you bumped the FBG thread and ignore the new Fabuland Metallica pics I posted, which also bumped it off the newest post listing on the main forum. Yeah...I can be a dick that way.
Shadows Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 I had thought about that but since you two were on eachother and I was told you and Mary could be up to something, I'm just kind of sitting back. Sometimes I was sitting back and Mary was ... nevermind. As I recall, she was suspected early on because of the "women and their bloody herbs" comment from Majiko, but I didn't think we knew enough to kill her. I vaguely suspected Lady PoisonPants at the time because in an alternate universe called EBRP, I had written a storyline where a Lady planned to kill the King with poisonous plants from her garden. I could find the post, which was before this game had even been announced. Then I thought, "wait, would Draggy steal directly from my EBRP for this?" and tossed out the idea. Guess what?!?! I thought about the fact that Michael and Kyle are both lying, but a King has to trust his executioner...I'd be surprised if he were a traitor-you on the other admit to wanting the power of the throne. I don't know. Actually, that's not exactly accurate. I had the power of the throne until the traitors killed the King. As it was explained to me, I was the lone voice he listened to in matters of state. He trusted me enough to let me run things, so I effectively had all the power I ever could, since I'm not family and can't take over the throne. When they killed him, I was out of a job and vowed to avenge our lost King and my former power. I can understand that appearing suspicious, but it's actually quite simple. I never thought you were a traitor before, but I may vote for you anyway since you bumped the FBG thread and ignore the new Fabuland Metallica pics I posted, which also bumped it off the newest post listing on the main forum. Yeah...I can be a dick that way. (OOC: Should I mention that I index on a different Brickshelf account and I'm trying to find the password for it since the crash/computer switchover, which is why I haven't indexed you yet? Dick.)
Stauder Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 Voat: Strawder Your getting revenge for the missing "c", aren't you?
Trexxen Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 I'm fine with giving Rotrigous a chance to be investigated. Unvote: Rotrigous/ImperialShadows Just so you know, though, everyone - even if you're missing at night, I CAN get your information. Usually a quick search of your quarters is all I need - as I did with the friar. Now then. I'm not going to vote Rotrigous, and I'm not going to vote Savril. That leaves Byron and Mary. Honestly, Byron has done nothing suspicious yet. Nor has Mary, aside from that "I think it's time for Trexxen to die" comment ;_; I'll think as I go to my lunch; alone (school again whoopee)... ~Kyle
Admiral Blockbeard Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 I disagree, I have done suspicious things, only they are innocent! I have no shame in disclosing information, as it is the one thing Traitors can not have out in the open! Mainly those already mentioned, not voting for Lady Suzanne and Marcus, Marcus was a bad timing incident, I was unable to make a post that day, ((me and my laptop where at a LAN party with no Internet connection , I slept in assuming I would have a chance to vote, only to find it was closed, so I entered my unofficial vote in the discussion thread, pointless I know but I was a little peeved at missing it.)) Lady Suzanne, if you read that day, was going to the choppa! I held my Vote as I wanted the day to last longer than Marcus's and provide the opportunity for a traitor to slip up, also have a little fun!. ((It seems when we know them they go QUICK)) If you have any other queries you would like answered I am all ears and all answers. Michael, no need for two loyalists to die, please ask me all the questions you want. I am starting to think I am really confused as to who is a Traitor, I was so sure Savril is, now I am not sure ((from the start due to the whole "message")). Kyle however only increases my suspicion, perhaps if there is another investigator they could investigate him , I have Adams words ringing in my head... I am just glad the night time killings have ended! With the Deaths now halved, we stand a good chance. We need a good conviction today, let us not leave it to the dragon. Friar, where are you, you have been quiet, let us hear from you, your silence in unnervingly me as to your loyalties... Mary, today you have posted little, you do not have a writing camp this week. You are AROUSING, my suspicions again... Paul, You have disappeared as well, where have you gone, you had plenty to say the other day, Kyle clearing you means little to me..., your acting rather suspicious. Rotrigous, some interesting and entertaining thoughts have been discussed, I hope my faith in you has not been misplaced. For now I trust it. I VOTE KYLE/ TREXXEN (I am still rather confused, this may well change) My thought is Kyle is the last Traitor, for those who question why Traitors need an Investigator, they need one to find out who is who, we know traitors know who each other are, but as I am led to believe they do not know who is who in the Loyalist ((user name and character name)) Kyle you ask why I think you saying Quarryman is a loyalist makes me suspect you more? It is simple, I had commented yesterday I believed him a Loyalist, Today you support my opinion, in a hope to get me off your back, now you are hunted by those who use reasoning and logic to vote, and you point the fingers at them! Now your putting on a face of, "you know what, I don't care" I realized something while writing this Grim was a Loyal, that was an investigator, you expect me to believe that the Traitors only got Marcus and Calvin with night actions, without an investigator? ((Its late I am off to bed))
commanderbly42 Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 And? I'm not here every day, 24/7. Anyhow, there's not really much for me to say. I could vote for someone but then again, what's to go on. Remember, if we kill Kyle and he is innocent, then most people he said are loyalists are loyalists. If he's a traitor, then we're back at square 1 - there aren't 4 traitors still. So, that leaves at a standstill: *Byron - quick to make accusations. The traitors had one investigator - having another just makes no sense. But then again, isn't the friar an investigator? *Rotrigous - I'm split about you. While you could have easily killed the king, you are pretty much in control of the land anyway, being the king's advisor. *Kyle - I can't be to sure but you were right about me being a loyalist. While and could vote for you, I just don't think that it would amount to much. *Lords Savril and Gary - You're both lords and I trust you both no more than you trust me. While Savril was said to be a loyalist, it was a friend of a traitor who said it. Could he be protecting you? Gary, you seem shady but no more guilty than I am. Still, I can't vote for most of you so I'll just not vote and wait for one of you to make a wrong move.
Hinckley Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 My thought is Kyle is the last Traitor, for those who question why Traitors need an Investigator, they need one to find out who is who, we know traitors know who each other are, but as I am led to believe they do not know who is who in the Loyalist ((user name and character name)) Er...but if they know who the traitors are then they know that the remainder are loyalists...
Trexxen Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 I will try my hand at this again. Those who are voting me, give me another night to do my work. Kill someone in the "four" I have given today; preferably Mary as she has been suspiciously active and flustered lately; then I'll investigate Rotrigous. If he is loyal and she is loyal, we have our traitors, though I have my doubts that at least one of them won't be a traitor. For now, Vote Mary/Zepher. This will give us all the information we need to rid ourselves of the traitors for good! ~Kyle
I Scream Clone Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 So if Kyle/Trexxen is a loyalist investigator, it would make sense for the traitors to kill him off (he already has a few votes if im not mistaken! However if Kyle is a Merc/Traitor investigator then we must be rid of him. Man im all wrapped up in logic at the moment. I would like to see Kyle investigate Roto, but dont know if it will do any good. Come forth Mary, why so flustered?
Trexxen Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 Oh, and before someone calls me on it - because I can't edit - I meant to say "inactive", not "active" in reference to Mary. ~Kyle
commanderbly42 Posted August 13, 2008 Posted August 13, 2008 Oh, and before someone calls me on it - because I can't edit - I meant to say "inactive", not "active" in reference to Mary.~Kyle (OOC: Zepher has been extremely busy these last few days so he/she won't be posting much) Kyle brings up good points. However, I think that inactivity can't really be relied on. We've killed loyalists before because of it and it shouldn't really be a deciding factor. It helped us root out Suzanne, yes, but the other two traitors were fairly active before they were executed. But, Michael was up to something last night? I'm beginning to regret my pledge to stop drinking wine.
Shadows Posted August 13, 2008 Posted August 13, 2008 Er...but if they know who the traitors are then they know that the remainder are loyalists... I don't really speak blockhead, but I think he means to align character and user names. Plus, we've established that the traitors had an investigator, but he was only loyal to himself, so it's kind of a pointless discussion. I just wish people would realise that we have another one that could do the same thing. So if Kyle/Trexxen is a loyalist investigator, it would make sense for the traitors to kill him off (he already has a few votes if im not mistaken! Except Calvin was a traitor investigator and he sold them out, so, as I said above, this one could do the same to the loyalists. Or already has... However if Kyle is a Merc/Traitor investigator then we must be rid of him.Man im all wrapped up in logic at the moment. I would like to see Kyle investigate Roto, but dont know if it will do any good. I'd like to see Kyle investigated, but isn't that convenient, there is no way to do it. As for me, it can't work for the same reason Calvin couldn't investigate me properly, so any result is either going to be inconclusive or a lie, and we'll have wasted another day. I just found a note... Im sure you are a nice guy IRL Just dont stand between me and the Throne buddy.-ISC Whoever that is.
I Scream Clone Posted August 13, 2008 Posted August 13, 2008 I don't really speak blockhead, but I think he means to align character and user names. Plus, we've established that the traitors had an investigator, but he was only loyal to himself, so it's kind of a pointless discussion. I just wish people would realise that we have another one that could do the same thing. Except Calvin was a traitor investigator and he sold them out, so, as I said above, this one could do the same to the loyalists. Or already has... I'd like to see Kyle investigated, but isn't that convenient, there is no way to do it. As for me, it can't work for the same reason Calvin couldn't investigate me properly, so any result is either going to be inconclusive or a lie, and we'll have wasted another day. I just found a note... Whoever that is. Misquote, Misquote! all out of context I have no idea who this ISC is?! I Lord Gary have found your guidance over these last terrible 11 days quite helpful, and appreciate your efforts running this kingdom I just got hit by a pigeon, hang on there is a note Rotrigous goes off in the sack! What? goes off like cheese? and why would he be in a sack? explain these shenanigans to me! No Royal advisor should be party to such kinky ideals!
Admiral Blockbeard Posted August 13, 2008 Posted August 13, 2008 >snip<What? goes off like cheese? and why would he be in a sack? >Snip< And I thought Byron was the smelly one Rotrigous speaks blocky quite well, I did indeed mean putting a name to a user, to further that point how do we know each character is actually that member they could have swapped!!! Nah that is too far! Also beyond that the Traitors would want to know what powers people have. I suppose we can kill Kyle after more "investigating", I UNVOTE Kyle/Trexxen, a lot of talk has been happening as to tonights happenings but I hate to break it to you that it is still today and we need to go after a likely suspect, unfortunately with most assuming Kyle is telling the truth that means we are going to kill one of the four he says we should! Very dangerous if my suspicions are well placed, however we have been wrong in the past so all I can do is pray, we do not kill another loyalist. Myself included in this four, I am concerned that he will indeed bring death to a loyalist, his vote currently has changed to one he hopes we will follow, Paul has said she is busy!?! Where did this information come from? I do not recall it... I hope that people do not see my thoughts as accusations, they are my reasonings, they are my searching for information, I have no night activity, so the best I can do is to investigate by day, I share with you only speculation, thus what I say is not going to be 100% correct, only as correct as I can manage to deduct with reasoning.
Dragonator Posted August 13, 2008 Author Posted August 13, 2008 Lots of great discussion going on here. Let's have a look at the voting tallies shall we? Current votes are as follows: Cpt. Pegleg Blockbeard (Lt. Byron): 1 Trexxen (Kyle): 1 Zepher (Mary the maid): 1 A majority of 5 votes is required. Take your time people, don't feel any pressure from me. As a note, the bonus challenge is now up, in the form of a Caption Challege. I hope you find it enjoyable. Keep at it guys, the audience is watching!
Shadows Posted August 13, 2008 Posted August 13, 2008 Current votes are as follows:Cpt. Pegleg Blockbeard (Lt. Byron): 1 Trexxen (Kyle): 1 Zepher (Mary the maid): 1 Wouldn't it be something if those were the traitors? Can there be that many left? Oh, there could if mercenaries don't count, and would also explain waiting until the very end to investigate the other two... Nah, that's just paranoid. Isn't it?
Zepher Posted August 13, 2008 Posted August 13, 2008 OOC: Yeah, sorry, I havn't been posting. I've been busy with two huge projects, so I'll get to posting again soon. I've also not been posting as I have nothing useful to say. I'm stuck at a dead-end. Sorry, I'll probaly start posting again tomorrow!
Recommended Posts