Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Mocopolis responded to me finally  - posted their reply in the first post.

 

Nothing new or anything surprising other than its a bit obvious they don't vet their designs.

 

Still tinkering with the body - nothing new to report there.

Posted (edited)

@Monkeyulize took a 3rd crack at the body in terms of designs and came up with some interesting ideas.

tie_defender_mk3_core_1.pngtie_defender_mk3_core_2.pngtie_defender_mk3_core_3.png

 

Any comments on weight/stability? Think it has a good chance? or is the 2nd iteration better?

Thanks in advance.

The idea is to be "truer" to the TIE Defender in shape/design lore wise.

My concern of course is - smaller struts == less stability?

Edited by Kage Goomba
Posted

I don't have strong feelings about it. It looks plenty sturdy, but it's hard to say much from the screenshots. I don't think it's necessarily the case that this is any more or less accurate shape-wise than the other design, so much as just that this one looks to be based more on the Rebels version of the TIE/d while the previous one was based on the FractalSponge/Essential Guide to Warfare version.

Posted
38 minutes ago, Kdapt-Preacher said:

I don't have strong feelings about it. It looks plenty sturdy, but it's hard to say much from the screenshots. I don't think it's necessarily the case that this is any more or less accurate shape-wise than the other design, so much as just that this one looks to be based more on the Rebels version of the TIE/d while the previous one was based on the FractalSponge/Essential Guide to Warfare version.

As "pretty" as the original look was - this version feels more true to me. Honestly.

My first introduction to the TIE Defender was TIE Fighter Game - not the series - and honestly the Rebels series was more like that version anyway - even with some slight changes.

 

Which makes it an engineering challenge in terms of weight/stability.

Bottom line - will it hold? That's what I'm looking for :D

Posted

The attachment of the wings to the pylons looks overengineered if anything, but I'm a bit worried about the center connection. I generally don't like using jumpers for structural connections, and setting the technic liftarms one stud out from their connection points can be a bit iffy. Id recommend using the brackets to lock the outsides of the hex parts together as well as attach details as long as it stays flush with the strut technic bricks.  This is a thousand times better than the original though, and has a pretty good chance of working out fine

Posted
9 minutes ago, ForgedInLego said:

The attachment of the wings to the pylons looks overengineered if anything, but I'm a bit worried about the center connection. I generally don't like using jumpers for structural connections, and setting the technic liftarms one stud out from their connection points can be a bit iffy. Id recommend using the brackets to lock the outsides of the hex parts together as well as attach details as long as it stays flush with the strut technic bricks.  This is a thousand times better than the original though, and has a pretty good chance of working out fine

@Monkeyulize

 

I'll let him know and see if I can work something out before he gets to it. Good points.

I was thinking along the same lines.

Honestly - better overengienered than not at all. ;)

Posted (edited)

@Monkeyulize went full tilt and pretty much finished the overall design with brillant techniques - however I'm being picky about certain aspects so I'm putting my refinements/adjustments on it.

 

Bottom line - he's a genius regardless. :)

So riddle me this - this is my refinement iteration on his design - is this legal? Will it work?

 

So here's the main core - Obviously its a tight fit - but will it fit? Namely the technic liftarm/crossbeams.

Also there's the 3 Axel peices that will hold the spine"shaft" in place.

Added extra hinge plates where Monkey only had just one layer each side.

tie_defender_mk3_core_7.png

tie_defender_mk3_core_8.png

Monkey originally uses 1x2 Technic Bricks with 2 Holes for the cross braces on the body - but I wantted to add an additional attachment point via linkers to the pylons for more brace/strength. Which meant going to traditional 1x2 Technic Brick and nuding everything in place.

Which yielded this

tie_defender_mk3_pylon_1.png

The 2 Red Circles are where the pylons attach to the main body - the Left one was the one Monkey designed - the Right one was my addition.

tie_defender_mk3_pylon_2.png

 

Comments?

@Kdapt-Preacher would like your input on this for sure.

 

I may change the "Center" Axel point for the spine as it may be a bit too nasty for assembly purposes - can just imagine the frustration that could cause. Wish there was a part that would let me reach all 3 areas of the body - but its just 1 to 2 too many MM's out of reach.

Edited by Kage Goomba
Posted
Just now, Kdapt-Preacher said:

It looks strong, but it's hard to get a sense from the screenshots. If you send me the Stud.io file I'll poke around with it.

Throwing you a copy momentarily.

Posted (edited)

Monkey wasn't convinced when I showed him my suggested changes.

I had just enough parts to do a rough build test.

0508222127_HDR.jpg

 

Gotta say - its nice and tight that it self reinforces based on spacing. I'm feeling confident with this approach. :)

Assembly will be rather challenging - ill need to take pics/document as I go when I do build this thing.

Edited by Kage Goomba
Posted
1 hour ago, icm said:

Looks good! I look forward to seeing the progress on this ship.

Appreciate the affirmation - I feel like I'm seeing the light at the end of this nightmare. Just need to do a bit more poking around and some careful consideration.

May attempt to rebuild the cockpit ball to something more rational since a total rebuild is needed anyway.

Monkey proposed one but I'd like to keep the smooth look if possible.

Posted

Tell me what you guys think:

Wanted to show Monkey's iteration first:

Cockpit and Tail removed as I'm going to be working on those next.

monkey_tie_defender_1.png

monkey_tie_defender_2.png

Again - he's genius - I'd love to know how he thought to do this.

And my refinements/adjustments-

Added more tiling to close gaps and make it look like a real pylon/smooth from spine to panel.

Also you can see the undersides of the TIE Panel base has some smoothing as well.

tie_defender_mk3_mainbody_1.png

tie_defender_mk3_mainbody_2.png

And to reveal whats hiding under all that

From TIE Panel to the Main Core - with only may be a Brick in spacing give or take - is all of this.

4 Struts with numerous linkers and those handy "I" (As in incredible) Shaped Liftarms that are 3 across and 5 tall in technic hole terms.

tie_defender_mk3_internal_strut.png

With my reinforcement I added earlier today - should be very strong and nicely attached to the body.

 

Now for the TIE Panels themselves - the outter panels have not changed as much as I'd love to redo - very cringe worthy - but those are not an easy thing to perfect - maybe later.

The main TIE Panel "body" however is thicker - heavier than the previous iteration due to the internal framework - slightly concerned about that. But with the main body beefed up - could be jitters on my part?

The TIE Panel "Cap" or "Hub" is on the pylon itself submodel wise - which means the pylon pokes straight through to the very top of the TIE Panel if you laid the panel flat on the table.

tie_defender_mk3_panel_1.png

Becomes more apparent here.

The TIE Panel cap is seen on the pylon - the angled lift-arm struts latch on to the main 4 strut frame in the pylon. The 4 strut frame also latches on to the panel below the cap. So lots of "grip" here.

I suspect assembly will be very challenging here - so yeah - bring on the feedback.

tie_defender_mk3_panel_2.png

Here's a cross section of the internal Panel Frame.

tie_defender_mk3_panel_internal.png

Personally I'd put in double the linkers for angled liftarms like I did on my Otana - but there's not much space - and the TIE Panel main bodies are too fat as it is.

An unavoidable issue due to the stability/weight concerns.

So tell me what you guys think.

Anyone here a pro with weird technic bodies? Let me know and ill toss you the file.

Going to be hard pressed to come up with something better than this. But that's what I said when this disaster started when I created my thread - and look at the geniuses that are among us. :)

Posted

Monkey pointed out the angling on the panels may not work so cleanly.

These are 9 teeth hinge plates - The angles compared to the original model and the current iteration appear to be the same - sooo not sure if this is a big concern or not.

bottom line - it may not look perfect.

Posted

@ForgedInLego Saves the day!

Thanks to his inspiration - I managed to find a way to brace the cockpit to keep it from sagging - its not pretty - but its much better than it was before.

tie_defender_cockpit_mk2_5.png

Adding some slightly longer liftarms on the top section of the main core - I shoved a lift arm into the upper portion of the cockpit - had to punch a hole in the bricks - took a lot of rearrangement - managed to pull it off - only just barely.

Using an Axel Shaft that's capped - just perfect in size to be flush.

And resulted in 1 more plates worth of axel grip for the spine.

Need to do some cleaning - but it works.

The portion joining the cockpit joining up is ugly - but it could be so much worse.

tie_defender_cockpit_mk2_6.png

 

Big thanks to ForgedinLego for the save!

Posted

Put together an rear end for it - not sure if I like it or not - also those inferred Ion Engine ports.

Always thought it was "Triple Ion Engine" and not "Twin" with a Defender.

tie_defender_mk3_rear.png

Would be slimmer if Lego actually bothered to make a 14L Long Axel - but nope - not even a 15.

Jumps between 16 and 12. Ugh lol.

Things left to do - polish the gap between cockpit and main body.

Audit Parts/Colors

Rebuild Stand (Keeping the chin as the center of balance likely shifted on this design) - going to put a pair of "U" clamps/cradles to hold it by the pylons and not the center part as I don't think it would be safe to hold it there. Should be interesting.

Any volunteers willing to shred this design and check for anything obvious? Let me know and ill make sure you get my "2.0" candidate file.

Heck - let me know if you want to build this damn thing - no instructions - but should be able to sort it out - DO LET ME KNOW if your going to do this. Cause I have a few favors to ask.

Posted (edited)

She's pretty much ready to build. Just need to check parts and figure out what I need to build her. Put all the pics and info in the first post.

Can't thank you guys enough for your help.

 

Anyone want to build this thing or help test structure? Hit me up - ill provide the file(s)

 

Only annoyance left aside from the obvious is the laser cannons - still not happy with those so I may change those.

Edited by Kage Goomba
Posted

Began tearing down all components for recycling to the new build - sorting into baggies.

Leaving Stand intact as its minor modifcations - the outter panels are the same - rest need to be torn down entirely as everything will be rebuilt.

The joys of sorting parts.

Painful to knoow a good chunk of these are a waste of money - guess I needed to build a stockpile anyway.

Thankfully most of these are potential Otana parts - not a total bummer there.

0510221741_HDR.jpg

Still plenty more to sort - cockpit ball is next - but ill get to it an another time - been at it for a while now.

Good thing I held on to all those baggies when I ordered parts hehe.

 

Speaking of - anyone here got a recommendation for a good standard sorting bin type thing for lego's?

Been experimenting.

Posted

Fun with sorting!  Hope you can make good use of all the excess parts for the Otana, like you said.

Posted
15 minutes ago, icm said:

Fun with sorting!  Hope you can make good use of all the excess parts for the Otana, like you said.

Yeah - its my only saving grace with the Otana needing 7-8k pieces thereabouts - bulk of which are grey parts.

Kind of why I chose the TIE/d as my first project to test/mess/learn.

 

Boy did I learn a lot.

I'm confident this will work out - ill be posting pics as I assemble as the "Assembly" part is going to be very tricky.

First need to do a part count and figure out what I'm missing and what I need.

Posted

Just finished auditing and counting bricks.

Looks like I have just shy of 60% (Ignoring the Outer TIE Panels as they are already built/finished) of the parts needed to build this "2.0" version of this TIE/d model.

Going to see about rebuilding the laser cannons thanks to @StephenBoe 's brilliant A-Wings - would like to have a better looking cannon that isn't "spinning" and ugly thanks to the botched 1.0 version design.

Once I get settled on that I'll do one last look at the parts list and then order up parts to build this thing.

If anyone is interested in building this thing - be sure to hit me up and ill send you the files/parts lists I've got.

Last chance to offer suggestions before I pull the trigger on parts.

Can't thank you guys enough for the input/feedback. :)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...