Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, Jack Alden said:

Have we had any evidence of anyone being blocked by someone other than Louisa or Patrick??  I.e. anything to suggest there is a scum blocker out there, other than Thomas' claim that he was blocked last night? 

This is a really interesting point. I don't think anyone else has brought up being blocked other then Timothy and Thomas. I suppose the scum blocker could have blocked someone without a night action like me or Joseph. Thank you for bringing this up though. 

Nigel and Timothy. The time has come for you too vote. Who shall it be? 

4 hours ago, Tariq j said:

.

The Tariq strikes back! 

Posted
5 hours ago, Jack Alden said:

Have we had any evidence of anyone being blocked by someone other than Louisa or Patrick??  I.e. anything to suggest there is a scum blocker out there, other than Thomas' claim that he was blocked last night? 

Here's another question, has anyone aside from Tom targeted Malcolm in the past days and what was their result?

 

Posted

Well either way @Thomas Chapman, I don't think we plan on having Jack as our lynch for today, but if Malcolm flips town then we'll be looking into him and you tomorrow. However we will need you to hammer if we want to enter tomorrow with it not being a repeat of today.

Posted
48 minutes ago, Malcolm Langley said:

I suppose the scum blocker could have blocked someone without a night action like me or Joseph. Thank you for bringing this up though. 

But even if the scum blocker did target you and Joesph. That only accounts for two of the three nights. Once the majority of the roles became public on Day Three, the scum blocker would have no reason to target a mason or a vanilla player. But so far none of the PR roles have said they've been blocked. (Other than Thomas today of course).

It does seem convienet that Jack was blocked on the night he was meant to investigate Malcom. I think the lynch today is crucial as it will determine who we focus on tomorrow. 

Vote: Malcom Langley

Posted

That Henry says he wasn't contacted by Thomas after being investigated is strange - by nature of the investigator claim, it is risky to fake and can easily build a network of townies. With Joseph, given the apprehension surrounding the accuracy of the result, I can understand not reaching out.

48 minutes ago, Louisa Hammond said:

Here's another question, has anyone aside from Tom targeted Malcolm in the past days and what was their result?

I jailkept Malcolm on Night One.

5 hours ago, Timothy Dixon said:

If a scum tries to target the town blocker ior Jailkeeper is there a power order that is followed to see whose block goes through?

When you resolve night actions you see who targets whom and where there may be conflicts. So if A targets B then that's easy, and if A targets B who targets C, that is also easy. But as host you have to plan for contingencies, where you could have a chain A -> B -> C -> D or a ring A -> B -> C -> A, and these decisions must be made before the game. But there's no precedence of town over scum or vice versa.

5 hours ago, Tariq j said:

.

Who be this strange pirate wench with a mysterious face?

 

Posted

Jack: Unstated Claimed Town Role

Timothy: Unstated Claimed Town Role

Louisa: Town Blocker

Patrick: Town Jailkeeper

Nigel: Town Watcher

Henry: Vanilla Town

Thomas: Claimed Town Investigator

Joseph: Claimed Mason

Malcolm: Claimed Mason

 

13 minutes ago, Patrick Triggs said:

When you resolve night actions you see who targets whom and where there may be conflicts. So if A targets B then that's easy, and if A targets B who targets C, that is also easy. But as host you have to plan for contingencies, where you could have a chain A -> B -> C -> D or a ring A -> B -> C -> A, and these decisions must be made before the game. But there's no precedence of town over scum or vice versa.

This could be plausible, but what roles could Joseph and Malcolm have (maybe in conjunction with Jack's as well) could result in Tom getting no result? 

Posted
1 hour ago, Louisa Hammond said:

Jack: Unstated Claimed Town Role

Timothy: Unstated Claimed Town Role

Louisa: Town Blocker

Patrick: Town Jailkeeper

Nigel: Town Watcher

Henry: Vanilla Town

Thomas: Claimed Town Investigator

Joseph: Claimed Mason

Malcolm: Claimed Mason

 

This could be plausible, but what roles could Joseph and Malcolm have (maybe in conjunction with Jack's as well) could result in Tom getting no result? 

According to Patrick no on is a vanilla townie. Everyone has a role. So Henry is not a vanilla town. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Louisa Hammond said:

This could be plausible, but what roles could Joseph and Malcolm have (maybe in conjunction with Jack's as well) could result in Tom getting no result? 

A quick check in the log journals tells me there’s a variation of the Godfather who is investigation immune. Meaning (I presume) an investigator will get no result on them. The issue here, is that Joesph has been investigated as Town. And I highly doubt there are TWO godfathers in one game. 

Maybe the scum blocker is x-shot? Which would explain why we haven’t had any evidence of a scum blocker up until now.

Posted
22 minutes ago, Timothy Dixon said:

Maybe the scum blocker is x-shot? Which would explain why we haven’t had any evidence of a scum blocker up until now.

Are all of Gordon’s inventions accounted for? He could have given scum a blocking tool by accident. 

Or they have a JOAT or something similar to counter the Inventor. 

Posted

Triggs ye steered us true thus far.  The strongest of allies come from rough waters it would seem.  I cast my lot with the Captains Loyalists. Langley, you have my spot.

VOTE: Malcom Langley

Posted
5 hours ago, Timothy Dixon said:

It does seem convienet that Jack was blocked on the night he was meant to investigate Malcom. 

Thomas was the one who claimed he was blocked.

 

4 hours ago, Louisa Hammond said:

This could be plausible, but what roles could Joseph and Malcolm have (maybe in conjunction with Jack's as well) could result in Tom getting no result? 

I had considered whether Malcolm was a commuter of some sort, but that role is usually town-aligned and I couldn't find any references to an equivalent role for scum.  Patrick also thought this was implausible.

 

2 hours ago, Joseph Finch said:

Are all of Gordon’s inventions accounted for? He could have given scum a blocking tool by accident. 

Or they have a JOAT or something similar to counter the Inventor. 

Gordon said he had one-shot investigation, one-shot protection and one-shot kill abilities to hand out.  He said he couldn't hand the same one out twice in a row.  

They are accounted for as far as I know as follows:

  • N1 - no-one got anything he said because he didn't trust anyone at that stage
  • N2 - I got an investigative ability (magnifying glass), which I used on Nigel on N2 (and I shared my results with Gordon and Patrick on D3)
  • N3 - Nigel was given a protective ability (vest), which was used to protect Thomas on Night 4
  • N4 - Gordon said he was going to give me another investigative ability, but I never received it.

@Nigel Clayton, anything in the pm from our captain when you received the vest that suggested it was anything other than a protection ability?

Posted (edited)

Vote Count:
Jack Alden: 3 (Thomas Chapman, Joseph Finch, Malcolm Langley)
Malcolm Langley: 6 (Henry Ogden, Patrick Triggs, Louisa Hammond, Jack Alden, Timothy Dixon, Nigel Clayton)

A majority of five is required to lynch. Under 21 hours remain in this day. 

Edit: I count really bad. 

Edited by Bob
Posted
13 hours ago, Jack Alden said:

 

@Nigel Clayton, anything in the pm from our captain when you received the vest that suggested it was anything other than a protection ability?

Nay sir, only that I could place it on someone, or myself, to protect them through the night.  

Posted

Argg! It be but a few hours before I go. I feel my death could benefit the town as it also will give way for a trust in Joseph. I hope you all look into Thomas, Jack, Henry, and Louisa tomorrow and even tonight a little. If Louisa just so happens to be scum then Thomas must also be scum, no one else could have blocked him so he would be lying. Keep that in mind. I be writing a poem about me life here in a few. Any last things to say from anyone? Anybody want to lend me so good o wine before I go? 

Posted

Born of a drunken farmer was a man named Malcom Langley

Fits with his father forced him out on his own, but he survived to conquer the sea 

A young lad he be, when his ship went down in a wreck 

His quickness to save all the crew that he tamed gave him nickname 'Swabs The Deck" 

 

His reputation it grew, and he found a life, in big pirate ship racin 

But a day that had came, a shipmate he saw in a brother he considerd a mason 

Joseph Finch be his name, known for fortune and fame, as the waves cried hallelujah 

So as the mates got to know, that they certainly weren't foes, Malcom joined on the Barracuda 

 

There were many aboard, some drew forth swords, but Malcom tried to learn all their names 

Blackbeard, Jack, Timmy, Alex, Louisa, Barty, Patrick, Thomas, Jane, Geoffrey, Remy, Henry, Nigel and of course Gordon the strange

The ship and it's crew had long trips ahead, invading that of the Imperial Fortress 

the cannons blew out in the night, as the cowards pissed in fright, the loudmouths suddenly become wordless 

 

But as we we got too big, the imperials hid, that be Geoffrey, and Barty the Brave

but still more to be found, I make a last sound, as they think I am one, and thus should sleep and a bottomless grave

So too all that can hear, I hope I have been clear, I am the loyalist pirate to have come

As I take a last breath, I wish you good luck, and sip the last of the Persian Maple Rum

Argg!

Posted

Vote Count:
Jack Alden: 3 (Thomas Chapman, Joseph Finch, Malcolm Langley)
Malcolm Langley: 6 (Henry Ogden, Patrick Triggs, Louisa Hammond, Jack Alden, Timothy Dixon, Nigel Clayton)

With 6 votes, Malcolm Langley has been lynched. Get your night actions in! 

13 hours ago, Henry Ogden said:

You don’t smell so great either :sick:

redbeard.jpg

":angry:"

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...