Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Another 42054 C model. It'll have 3 power functions, and at least 4 manual functions. The front will have a grabber like in @M_longer's C model, though without any function:

-Front stage 1 (powered)

-rotation rear excavator (powered)

-rear excavator stage 1 (powered)

-front stage 2 (manual) 

-rear excavator stage 2 (manual)

-HoG steering (manual)

-opening doors

CURRENT STATE:

IMG_7001

Here are some pictures:

IMG_6944IMG_6946IMG_6947IMG_6945

Leave a comment! More progress soon.

BrickbyBrickTechnic

Edited by BrickbyBrickTechnic
Posted

Pitty that you are not making yellow one in this scale...it could have 4cylinder engine, 4 wheel drive, 3 mod steering...back to topic - I'm affraid that small LA is to week for that purpose, but lets see how another C model will look like

Posted
  On 11/26/2017 at 11:44 AM, I_Igor said:

Pitty that you are not making yellow one in this scale...it could have 4cylinder engine, 4 wheel drive, 3 mod steering...back to topic - I'm affraid that small LA is to week for that purpose, but lets see how another C model will look like

Expand  

1. I have virtually no yellow pieces.

2. 3 steering modes are possible, but only with the complete removal of power functions and gearbox. The fake engine could be built into this, no problem (not working, just existent).

3. What is the problem with small LA's? 

Posted
  On 11/26/2017 at 6:47 PM, M_longer said:

You noticed that in 42061 LA is mounted in oposite direction compared to this WIP model?

Expand  

I had the same problem on my tilting bed on Unimog no matter which direction I place LA. I assume that you wont use much weight on it?

Posted

Update time!

So I added the front hood and added the "pallet" attachment to the front. I have one problem though, and that's that the front looks kind of weird and half-baked and I don't know what to do about it, after 6 iterations.

IMG_6948IMG_6948IMG_6951

And a bit of side was added as I need to start rationing DBG pieces:

IMG_6953

So That's it. Leave a comment!

Posted

Looks better, but it would be best if you could print real machine dimension and masses page in scale that fits your moc to see proportions

Posted

Now that I see what it looks like with an extra stud on both sides, I think the thinner version looks better.  With the addition of the 1x5 lift arm, the bodywork does not flow as nicely.  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...