Duvors Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 I only get some missing page message, you're digging yourself a huge hole here and frankly behaving very scummy, I can't now vote as my mobile can't embolden text, but I will shortly. That's all anybody gets. That's the whole point. I've been saying this entire time that the link leads nowhere now. If I gave you all a link that took you to a real writeboard conversation then I would've been lying this entire time. And considering that if this had been the case then my lie would've been stupid as it would've made me more suspicious insted of less.
Piratedave84 Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 Does anyone here know how to invite new people to a PM conversation that's already been started? I told you in PM and I'll repeat here YOU CAN'T SHARE PM'S Lodmund potato messaged me and posted his whole conversation with Jarl ... It's very weird, they speak at the third person ...
KotZ Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 Two things 1) Scum buddies ... How many scums do you think there are ... I don't think there's much regrouping going on at this point, certainly not after we lynch a 4th one today 2) Why in the world would you validate his vote for you ... I'm guessing five to six at the most. Lodmund would make the fourth, leaving one or two left. The only regrouping they could do, I used the word for lack of better terms, is dig in and try to be as much help to the town as possible and try to off the rest of the town as best as they can and stay hidden. Are you saying you have no original thoughts whatsoever? Aha, I see you can muster at least one original thought. You're saying his vote is an OMGUS vote? Do you think anyone wouldn't want to get suspicion off themself? I'm a business man. I don't get original ideas, I just sell them. Lodmund did just send me a PM though with the link to the writeboard, the same one he posted in the thread. Throwing that put there to see who else received a message from him.
Piratedave84 Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 I only get some missing page message, you're digging yourself a huge hole here and frankly behaving very scummy, I can't now vote as my mobile can't embolden text, but I will shortly. You! Do something! Contribute to the discussion your post are nothing more than agreeing with others and voting with the bandwagon.
Duvors Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 Lodmund did just send me a PM though with the link to the writeboard, the same one he posted in the thread. Throwing that put there to see who else received a message from him. I'm going to say right not that everyone who vote for me got one. I'd make a great campaign manager or whatever.
Hinckley Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 I don't think the rules prohibit you from adding people to a conversation. Think about it. If I wanted to start a town block, I could just add the other PRs to my conversation with the tracker. Quoting PMs to each other by PM, do the rules prohibit that? I thought it was just posting them in public.
Duvors Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 I can't find any link to invite new participants. Maybe I'm not a hight enough rank?
KotZ Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 I'm going to say right not that everyone who vote for me got one. I'd make a great campaign manager or whatever. Lodmund for Lynchee does have a pretty nice ring to it...
Duvors Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 No sorry, but I can't find any way to invite new people to an exsisting coversation. I can make a new one and invite up to three people but as soon as a convesation starts I can't get anyone new in. Tell me, what does archiving a conversation do?
Hinckley Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 It appears the rules do prohibit quoting other players' PMs by PM. Why don't you paraphrase your conversation with Jarl for everybody?
Pandora Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 I'm a business man. I don't get original ideas, I just sell them. So are you saying his vote is just an OMGUS vote, or was there more to it than that with your post?
KotZ Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 So are you saying his vote is just an OMGUS vote, or was there more to it than that with your post? I don't think technically it's an OMGUS in the strict definition of the term, because he voted for me first, but I do think he is shifting blame away from himself. So if that is being an OMGUS vote then yes, I am saying his vote is an OMGUS vote.
Duvors Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 It appears the rules do prohibit quoting other players' PMs by PM. Why don't you paraphrase your conversation with Jarl for everybody? Why? None of you will believe it's real anyway.Ech, fine, I'll do it. Me: Hey, is this for real or are you trying to catch a traitor unawares? Jarl: Nope, it's for real. Sorry if this spoils everything. Me: No, I'm fine. This is the best way for you guys to contact the traitor. But he'd have to verify you first wouldn't he? Jarl: The other scummos said that this was the best way. I'm the scum killer and I killed Palathadric. My kill will now pass to the next guy. Not certain how to convince the traitor that I'm for real, but they'll know by tomorrow. Me: The Traitor won't be able to wait that long. Jarl: Yeah. The scum will have trouble trusting the traitor, all I do is give them his name and see if they want to contact him. Me: When do you think he'll appear? Me again: Have to go away for a while, don't trust anyone who contacts you. Jarl: Okay, I'll have three hours to wait for the traitor to come along. Me(some time later): I don't have much time left so I'll tell you this now: I am the traitor. Jarl: I guessed that. I'll send this and any counterclaims to the scum. If you're telling the truth this'll work out just dandy. Keep playing as you are. Jarl again: Here's the link to contact the scum with, password is 'lord' (insert now disabled link here).
Hinckley Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 Why? None of you will believe it's real anyway. Ech, fine, I'll do it. Me: Hey, is this for real or are you trying to catch a traitor unawares? Jarl: Nope, it's for real. Sorry if this spoils everything. Me: No, I'm fine. This is the best way for you guys to contact the traitor. But he'd have to verify you first wouldn't he? Jarl: The other scummos said that this was the best way. I'm the scum killer and I killed Palathadric. My kill will now pass to the next guy. Not certain how to convince the traitor that I'm for real, but they'll know by tomorrow. Me: The Traitor won't be able to wait that long. Jarl: Yeah. The scum will have trouble trusting the traitor, all I do is give them his name and see if they want to contact him. Me: When do you think he'll appear? Me again: Have to go away for a while, don't trust anyone who contacts you. Jarl: Okay, I'll have three hours to wait for the traitor to come along. Me(some time later): I don't have much time left so I'll tell you this now: I am the traitor. Jarl: I guessed that. I'll send this and any counterclaims to the scum. If you're telling the truth this'll work out just dandy. Keep playing as you are. Jarl again: Here's the link to contact the scum with, password is 'lord' (insert now disabled link here). I fully believe every word of it. And that's why my vote is staying where it is.
Duvors Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 I fully believe every word of it. And that's why my vote is staying where it is. Can you please explain that remark?
Dannylonglegs Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 And that's what made you Unvote him? Wow. Are you actually the scum traitor? * actually * actually Oh... weird. I know what happened with my italics now. Anyways: vote: Lodmund (Lord Duvors)
Duvors Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 And that's what made you Unvote him? Wow. Are you actually the scum traitor? * actually * actually No you moron! I was lying about my role to him so that I could get into the scum's confidence. And What the hell is all this about unvoting jarl? I never did that.
Dannylonglegs Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 My mistake about the unvoting. I got a bit confused.
Hinckley Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 Can you please explain that remark? It seems like a conversation an actual traitor would have or one that would be faked. I'm less confident the second time I read it. No you moron! Now now. Be nice. I am still disturbed that Dar seems to think the same way the supposed Scum responded on the "deleted" writeboard. If Lodmund is Scum, then Dar gave himself away by matching what was made up about how the conversation on the writeboard ended.
Dannylonglegs Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 My mistake about the unvoting. I got a bit confused. Wait, no I'm not? You know, I've just been in contact with Mist, and I'm starting to doubt that she's scum. A suspicious thing to say? Yes. But that doesn't change the facts. Unvote: Mist (Mencot). What made you Unvote her? Your Writeboard shenanigans were with Jarl, right? Have you explained why you Unvote Mist yet? Can we get a paraphrase of that conversation too? Or have you already done so and I missed it. That's been known to happen.
Duvors Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 Heres the conversation I had with Mist, paraphrased of corse: Me: Another admission? Are you idiots trying to lose? * Mist:No. Are you the scummytraitorperson? ** Me: emote denoting the fact that I found this odd Me again: I don't think you're scum anymore. Mist: Why? Me: because you don't seem to know about my conversation with them, that's why! *this is indignation at the fact that the scum don't seem to understand how the game works, played up because of personal weirdness. **this is strange in hindsight since I had already claimed traitor to them and mist must have known that. That's what made me unvote her, however I later rescinded these views and revoted for her, stupid isn't it? It seems like a conversation an actual traitor would have or one that would be faked. I'm less confident the second time I read it. That shows how good an actor I am! That remark may not have been helpful to my cause. Now now. Be nice. Sorry. I am still disturbed that Dar seems to think the same way the supposed Scum responded on the "deleted" writeboard. If Lodmund is Scum, then Dar gave himself away by matching what was made up about how the conversation on the writeboard ended. I don't see how that works if I'm scum, if I was presumed innocent then something like this:'I am still disturbed that Dar seems to think the same way that the Scum responded on the writeboard. If Lodmund is Innocent, then Dar gave himself away by matching the way the conversation on the writeboard ended.' would make sense, but I don't see how what you've got here makes any.
Piratedave84 Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 Why? None of you will believe it's real anyway. Ech, fine, I'll do it. Me: Hey, is this for real or are you trying to catch a traitor unawares? Jarl: Nope, it's for real. Sorry if this spoils everything. Me: No, I'm fine. This is the best way for you guys to contact the traitor. But he'd have to verify you first wouldn't he? Jarl: The other scummos said that this was the best way. I'm the scum killer and I killed Palathadric. My kill will now pass to the next guy. Not certain how to convince the traitor that I'm for real, but they'll know by tomorrow. Me: The Traitor won't be able to wait that long. Jarl: Yeah. The scum will have trouble trusting the traitor, all I do is give them his name and see if they want to contact him. Me: When do you think he'll appear? Me again: Have to go away for a while, don't trust anyone who contacts you. Jarl: Okay, I'll have three hours to wait for the traitor to come along. Me(some time later): I don't have much time left so I'll tell you this now: I am the traitor. Jarl: I guessed that. I'll send this and any counterclaims to the scum. If you're telling the truth this'll work out just dandy. Keep playing as you are. Jarl again: Here's the link to contact the scum with, password is 'lord' (insert now disabled link here). The PMs sent to me match up with this version
Hinckley Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 Heres the conversation I had with Mist, paraphrased of corse: Me: Another admission? Are you idiots trying to lose? * Mist:No. Are you the scummytraitorperson? ** Me: emote denoting the fact that I found this odd Me again: I don't think you're scum anymore. Mist: Why? Me: because you don't seem to know about my conversation with them, that's why! *this is indignation at the fact that the scum don't seem to understand how the game works, played up because of personal weirdness. **this is strange in hindsight since I had already claimed traitor to them and mist must have known that. That's what made me unvote her, however I later rescinded these views and revoted for her, stupid isn't it? That shows how good an actor I am! That remark may not have been helpful to my cause. Sorry. I don't see how that works if I'm scum, if I was presumed innocent then something like this: 'I am still disturbed that Dar seems to think the same way that the Scum responded on the writeboard. If Lodmund is Innocent, then Dar gave himself away by matching the way the conversation on the writeboard ended.' would make sense, but I don't see how what you've got here makes any. If you're developing the plan together, Dar would be in the same mindset as you are describing the Scum to be when they supposedly cut off communications when I mentioned your name. Weird how Dar explained what the Scum were thinking in the post where you explained what they said.
Duvors Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 If you're developing the plan together, Dar would be in the same mindset as you are describing the Scum to be when they supposedly cut off communications when I mentioned your name. Weird how Dar explained what the Scum were thinking in the post where you explained what they said. Oh, and I'd be stupid enough to make my fake scum act like my own allies right?Look, Pudding, why don't you compare the word-for-word account of the doing on the writeboard the scum sent me to with your own? And with Agnar's if you have a link to it? Look for discrepancies and things like that. See if my account has the ring of truth. Do something other than shout at me.
Piratedave84 Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 Oh, and I'd be stupid enough to make my fake scum act like my own allies right? Feel a need to distance yourself???
Recommended Posts