Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ah, the problem is that your pivot point is too far forward. With your front driver axle being blind, and then your lead bogie pivot being a few studs ahead of that, it creates the rather extreme angle you've come across. I would replace those technic T-beams with something that lets you mount your pistons from a higher vantage point (Keep them at the same height, just put the attachment higher to free up some room) so that you can move your pivot point to as close to that lead axle as possible.

Posted

Right now your driver go (from front to back) Blind-Flanged-Blind-Flanged. Swap them to get Flanged-Blind-Flanged-Blind. This will make the front overhang better at the expense of the rear, but there are no pistons in the back to cause trouble. To deal with the increased angle at the back, lengthen the connecting link between the rear truck and the drivers, so that the link connects somewhere between the 3rd and 4th driven axles.

The BR55 is an 0-8-0 (UIC: D) wheel arrangement; porting Duq's solution without considering the new context (in a 2-8-4 / 1D2) is a recipe for disappointment. You did the right thing by trying this before you built any more of the locomotive though; I often see people who build a detailed body without thinking about how the chassis will work.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...