Scaevola Posted January 7, 2015 Posted January 7, 2015 Sinclair, your reasons are getting weaker each post. You have no proof that I apparently tried to deny a lynching that was clearly going to go through, which you did the same. You had almost no attempt to counter-argue what I said except for repeating yourself. There, I'll... Vote: Scaevola (Sinclair Viola) Because Siegfried was right about Figurelli and caught him in his lie. If you do come up as a Loyalist then the our speaker has a lot of explaining to. But due to his excellent presentation against Figurelli yesterday, I trust what Siegfried says. You refused to analyze my posts therefore I recycled my reasons.
Scaevola Posted January 7, 2015 Posted January 7, 2015 Did you vote for Stanley yesterday? Were you complaining about me then? Hmm. Something to think about. Figurelli's impeachment was backed by infallible anecdotal evidence. This investigation result is incorrect.
def Posted January 7, 2015 Posted January 7, 2015 Figurelli's impeachment was backed by infallible anecdotal evidence. This investigation result is incorrect. Nice to see you have a sense of humour about it The lynch yesterday had no evidence. This one does though
Bob Posted January 7, 2015 Posted January 7, 2015 Now why would you say something silly like that? I spearheaded a lynch on scum yesterday. You would be lynched before me, since you have done nothing to show yourself town. It could all be some next level scum play that you're going for. If there's one thing I've learned in my time in the Legislature, it's that if you trust someone, you should still keep an eye on them just in case.
def Posted January 7, 2015 Posted January 7, 2015 It could all be some next level scum play that you're going for. If there's one thing I've learned in my time in the Legislature, it's that if you trust someone, you should still keep an eye on them just in case. Let's hope the vig doesn't target you tonight
Scaevola Posted January 7, 2015 Posted January 7, 2015 Nice to see you have a sense of humour about it The lynch yesterday had no evidence. This one does though Figurelli was blatantly scum. He claimed to have killed Rep. Karchevsky when you yourself said that "I've been talking to the watcher, they followed Kovacs night one. Someone targeted him, it wasn't you," Evidence enough for me. This case is just a null, black and white investigation result.
def Posted January 7, 2015 Posted January 7, 2015 Figurelli was blatantly scum. He claimed to have killed Rep. Karchevsky when you yourself said that "I've been talking to the watcher, they followed Kovacs night one. Someone targeted him, it wasn't you," Evidence enough for me. This case is just a null, black and white investigation result. Was I not bluffing about the watcher result about Figurelli? I could swear I was My gut just gets really strong sometimes. (cue God shaking his fist at the screen) The evidence against you is pretty pure: the investigator who cleared me has condemned you. If you are town, well, who knows what we'll do, but I'm just the messenger, and shooting the messenger is what Bobs fools do.
Yzalirk Posted January 7, 2015 Posted January 7, 2015 Out of curiosity, Sinclair, what role are you then, if you are a Loyalist and believe Siegfried is lying? You don't have to answer but, like I said, I'm just curious.
Scaevola Posted January 7, 2015 Posted January 7, 2015 Was I not bluffing about the watcher result about Figurelli? I could swear I was My gut just gets really strong sometimes. (cue God shaking his fist at the screen) The evidence against you is pretty pure: the investigator who cleared me has condemned you. If you are town, well, who knows what we'll do, but I'm just the messenger, and shooting the messenger is what Bobs fools do. Quite a gamble to take with our votes (but worthwhile). The investigator is insane and therefore it's possible he got a town role on you and a scum on me (not to say you're scum, but the results are random) Out of curiosity, Sinclair, what role are you then, if you are a Loyalist and believe Siegfried is lying? You don't have to answer but, like I said, I'm just curious. I am a vanilla loyal.
badboytje88 Posted January 7, 2015 Posted January 7, 2015 Vanilla loyal or loyal vanilla? I have a sudden craving for ice cream...
Bob Posted January 7, 2015 Posted January 7, 2015 Let's hope the vig doesn't target you tonight I was under the impression that the vig was going to target Pierce, as we deduced he is the scum killer.
Piratedave84 Posted January 7, 2015 Posted January 7, 2015 I was under the impression that the vig was going to target Pierce, as we deduced he is the scum killer. I'm not! Are you worried? You should be
def Posted January 7, 2015 Posted January 7, 2015 I was under the impression that the vig was going to target Pierce, as we deduced he is the scum killer. What are you talking about? He was blocked, there was no kill. That is no guarantee of anything.
Tamamono Posted January 8, 2015 Author Posted January 8, 2015 (edited) Vote Tally Sinclair Viola (Scaevola) - 11 (Speedy, Adam, mostlytechnic, Bob, adventurer1, TPRU, Lego Spy, Goliath, badboytje88, Mencot, Piratedave) Gerald Hatley (Goliath) - 1 (Scaevola) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ With 11 votes, Sinclair Viola (Scaevola) has been impeached Representative Viola is backed into a corner - literally. "Wait, guys, you don't want to do this... I'm loyal, I promise!" "I've got to get out of here..." he mutters to himself. Taking a leap of faith, takes a running jump off the bench. Unfortunately, he lands a bit short... The Speaker raises his gavel... "Wait, no..." Justice Montgomery begins. You have 24 hours to get your night actions in. Edited January 9, 2015 by Tamamono
Recommended Posts