Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was the first vote, for reasons stated. As much as I like to pretend I'm intelligent and influential, my reason to be suss on Hatley is in no way air tight. I don't need to defend anything since I couldn't know a bunch of others would follow me. At the same time, three other votes isn't overwhelming proof either. It could just be evidence of sheep behavior. But, between the two, if someone were being saved, it would be Jacob. I think his lynch will tell us more and is a safer gamble. Or at least teach us a lesson about the dangers of bandwagoning.

So you admit to bandwagoning? I thought you were against doing it?

You can think I'm bandwagoning but quite frankly, I could care less what you or anyone else thinks. I'd say it's wiser to keep the talkative in rather than the quiet who tends to have nothing to contribute, but that's my opinion. I'm not hiding anything at all.

For people who vote against me, I honestly don't care. If Jacob comes up as an Octan, than that's good. If he comes up as a Loyalist, than I'll probably be tomorrows lynch since I'm the second person with most votes. But then you guys will be down another Loyalist which is no good.

Posted

Vote Tally

Jacob Palacios (JackJonespaw) - 10 (Scaevola, Adam, badboytje88, adventurer1, Bob, Speedy, TPRU, mostlytechnic, Goliath)

Gerald Hatley (Goliath) - 2 (Piratedave, Lego Spy)

Siegfried Dixon (Speedy) - 1 (Brickelodeon)

Bjorn Borchard (badboytje88) - 1 (Stickfig)

8 hours remain. With 15, it takes 8 to lynch.

Posted

Really? You think there's some chance that my argument with Hatley was staged, and that I'm rescuing him now? Wow. That's a lot of paranoia you have. But point taken, Hatley's rants at me could be an elaborate ruse to throw you off my trail.

<--- Yup, paranoid guy over here. I've seen staged fights, staged multi-party PM conversations, staged anything. And again, I didn't say you ARE rescuing him, I said you COULD BE and IF it turns out that Hatley is scum and Jacob is loyal, then I'd be VERY HARD looking at you.

For people who vote against me, I honestly don't care. If Jacob comes up as an Octan, than that's good. If he comes up as a Loyalist, than I'll probably be tomorrows lynch since I'm the second person with most votes. But then you guys will be down another Loyalist which is no good.

Naw, you probably won't get lynched tomorrow. Heck, look who yesterday's #2 was - not you or Jacob! It's not till the late game that #2 vote-getter turns into the next day's lynch.

Posted

Naw, you probably won't get lynched tomorrow. Heck, look who yesterday's #2 was - not you or Jacob! It's not till the late game that #2 vote-getter turns into the next day's lynch.

There is the possibility from night actions as well. Maybe I shouldn't be so negative but it's hard not to be when you have quite a bit of votes against you, if you where in my position. I assure you I'm a Loyalist but I can't say the same for Jacob, especially since he's been awfully quiet and only has one post each day which, like I said, leads me to think he's scum.

Posted

Because he's only had two posts on this day which makes me believe he's trying to avoid detection from other players. If you truly are a Loyalist, you should have nothing to hide.

With 9 votes against him, I think it's fair to say that Jacob is not avoiding a lot of things; don't you agree ?

Now, before you guys say my vote is for the bandwagon, it's not. I feel everyone should participate because that's what we all agreed to before coming here.

TCHOO!!!! THCOOOOO!!! There was already 9 votes, the lynch was/is sealed and as such you were free to vote however you liked and you opted to hop on the bandwagon

Now if I were with Octan, wouldn't you think I'd be less talkative? I'd think so since that's usually how most scum players are from what I've seen. But if I do get impeached and you guys will see my innocence, I hope you guys feel a bit foolish if you are a Loyalist like myself.

That's a ridiculous assertion; low post count equals not scum and high post count does not mean confirmed town; that's just poor reasoning

There is the possibility from night actions as well. Maybe I shouldn't be so negative but it's hard not to be when you have quite a bit of votes against you, if you where in my position. I assure you I'm a Loyalist but I can't say the same for Jacob, especially since he's been awfully quiet and only has one post each day which, like I said, leads me to think he's scum.

Quite a bit ... 2 out of 15 ... why so concerned with your vote count when the lynch has been sealed and you are 'safe'

Posted

Just stop, kid. You continuously trying to go after is not working. You are saying some of the most idiotic things I've heard to the point I'm starting to laugh. For example:

That's a ridiculous assertion; low post count equals not scum and high post count does not mean confirmed town; that's just poor reasoning

Do you have proof of this? Did I ever say that hands down Jacob is scum? No. All I said was because of his posting only twice this day, it appears to me he's trying to hide under the radar. We'll see if he's scum or not.

And why are you so fired up because of my vote? If he was done already without my vote, wouldn't you think my vote is kind of meaningless? That doesn't mean I jumped on the bandwagon. I looked back to see what the fuss was with Jacob and I noticed he doesn't talk much and I found that very suspicious. From playing Town of Salem, this is a common tactic used by the mafia or the serial killer.

But coming after me for no reason for almost all your posts is just unnecessary. I'm not really sure what vendetta you have against me but I find it a bit scummy. And just so you know, nobody is "safe". Well, maybe for you if you're an Octan scumbag.

Posted

Do you have proof of this? Did I ever say that hands down Jacob is scum? No. All I said was because of his posting only twice this day, it appears to me he's trying to hide under the radar. We'll see if he's scum or not.

Are you serious? I quoted you saying yout though he was scummy, remember? "trying to avoid detection" "if you are trully a loyalist"; does that not ring a bell?

But coming after me for no reason for almost all your posts is just unnecessary. I'm not really sure what vendetta you have against me but I find it a bit scummy. And just so you know, nobody is "safe". Well, maybe for you if you're an Octan scumbag.

Just trying to find scum and it seems to be working; the more you get agitated, the more likely you are to slip up.

:thumbup:

Posted

Are you serious? I quoted you saying yout though he was scummy, remember? "trying to avoid detection" "if you are trully a loyalist"; does that not ring a bell?

It seemed like you think my reason is stupid, that's why, and it still seems like that for me.

Just trying to find scum and it seems to be working; the more you get agitated, the more likely you are to slip up.

:thumbup:

Let me tell you, you are wasting your time trying to go after me because I'm genuinely a Loyalist. Nothing you are doing is working against me. That's fine if you don't believe me but if you are a Loyalist, you "trying to find scum" isn't working because you're going after the wrong guy.

Posted

With a majority of votes against Jacob (JackJonespaw), he still has yet to come out with a solid defense or response to the votes against him. We could chalk this up to inactivity or inexperience, but I'm beginning to get worried. Wouldn't a scum team, in addition to setting up a proxy vote to try and save Jacob (JackJonespaw), also give him advice on what to say in his defense? Wouldn't they be prompting him to speak up for himself? These aren't substantial enough doubts to move my vote, however.

Just stop, kid. You continuously trying to go after is not working. You are saying some of the most idiotic things I've heard to the point I'm starting to laugh. For example:

Please refrain from name-calling and insults. I realize that we're in a tense situation here, and things can get rather heated, but we should all attempt to maintain a measure of respect for our fellow representatives. Furthermore, using methods like name-calling and insults only serves to devalue your arguments and move the conversation away from our true purpose: finding scum.

Posted

Man, this is getting a little out of control. :sceptic:

For now:

Unvote: Gerald Hatley (Goliath)

I don't know who to vote for at this point. If I vote for Jack I'll probably be called out for bandwagoning.

I'll look back in in an hour and see what's happened.

Posted

Please refrain from name-calling and insults. I realize that we're in a tense situation here, and things can get rather heated, but we should all attempt to maintain a measure of respect for our fellow representatives. Furthermore, using methods like name-calling and insults only serves to devalue your arguments and move the conversation away from our true purpose: finding scum.

Yeah, you're right. I apologize, Pierce (Piratedave84) for insulting you by calling you a kid and saying your statements are quite idiotic. I'm just so used to calling everyone a kid, that's why. :grin:

I think it's clear who's going to be impeached by the end of the day but I sure do hope he turns out to be Octan otherwise I'll feel bad about my vote. But we shouldn't refrain from trying to find scum since that's our duty. Hopefully there is something good that comes out of this day that we can use for the next.

Posted

After waiting quite a while, no one has really posted much of anything, so I'm going to vote for Jacob due to vote abstaining, and general lack of defense, having removed my vote from Gerald. I know he already has 11 votes, but I feel like voting for anyone else would make any sense.

Jacob Palacios (JackJonespaw)

Posted

After waiting quite a while, no one has really posted much of anything, so I'm going to vote for Jacob due to vote abstaining, and general lack of defense, having removed my vote from Gerald. I know he already has 11 votes, but I feel like voting for anyone else would make any sense.

Jacob Palacios (JackJonespaw)

Your vote format is wrong

Posted (edited)

Final Vote Tally

Jacob Palacios (JackJonespaw) - 10 (Scaevola, Adam, badboytje88, adventurer1, Bob, Speedy, TPRU, mostlytechnic, Goliath)

Gerald Hatley (Goliath) - 2 (Piratedave, Stickfig)

Siegfried Dixon (Speedy) - 1 (Brickelodeon)

Abstaining - 1 (Lego Spy)

You have 24 hours to get your actions in

Edited by Tamamono
Posted

Well this is going to make me look bad. But after another short rest, I decided that my vote for Siegfried was stupid. Of course he is going to hide his abilities, or else the scum will knock him off faster than an indy 500 driver. He only revealed them because he wanted to avoid confusion, a very convincing mark of loyalty. A smart scum would have tried to use the abilities to get a bandwagon onto a townie.

I have very little excuse for my bad voting, other than the fact that I have not had the ability to pay full attention due to the side effects of my medication. I have not heard a single thing anyone has said yet. I will consequentially be forced to bandwagon as the best thing we need is an impeachment.

Unvote: Speedy (Siegfried Dixon)

Vote: JackJonespaw (Jacob Palacios)

I will be able to think logically after this next impeachment, so don't think too badly of me yet.

Sorry didn't see it was over.

Posted

Final Vote Tally

Jacob Palacios (JackJonespaw) - 10 (Scaevola, Adam, badboytje88, adventurer1, Bob, Speedy, TPRU, mostlytechnic, Goliath)

Gerald Hatley (Goliath) - 2 (Piratedave, Stickfig)

Siegfried Dixon (Speedy) - 1 (Brickelodeon)

Abstaining - 1 (Lego Spy)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

With 10 votes, Jacob Palacios (JackJonespaw) has been impeached

OWtN21s.jpg

Justice Montgomery approaches the Speaker at the end of the day.

"Well, your honor, we've come to a consensus - we'll lynch impeach the one who never talks. The measure passed with flying colors."

"Well, where is he?" Montgomery replies, confused.

"Uhh, nobody knows. He didn't really show up today - or ever, for that matter!"

R4yKz4H.jpg

Suddenly, everyone hears a faint whimpering noise...

6SpO3T1.jpg

Hiding behind the Speaker's chair is Representative Palacios.

"I just don't want to talk to anyone..." he mumbles.

The next Day will be posted shortly.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...