Sponsored Links

[Scouty]

As we were talking about it in the Battlefront II thread, we moved the discussion to this next gen game The Force Unleashed.






All discussion for said game will be placed here for our eager wait till it's arrival in 2008, as I am told.

:-)

[casewindu]

that looks good. is that the one were on the advert the jedi uses the force to pick up a poor stormy, smash him against some crates then throughs him, and the crates, into an oncomming tie?


if its that i cant wait for it! :-D

[Scouty]

The pictures Vader just posted in the "TIE Army Thread" are drawings of the game, so yes, that is the one.

[Ecto]

Could I see this advert?

[Starwars4J]

Hm...I was wondering where he got those awesome pictures from

[Scouty]

http://lucasarts.com...forceunleashed/ This is to the official site of LucasArts.

Here, from the Star Wars Wiki, is some more info: http://starwars.wiki...nleashed_(game)

I'm personally cyked for this game *sweet*

[Vader]

Seems you beat me to it IS in making this thread, guess this will stop me from hijacking the BF thread X-D ;-)

Anyway as IS said i did get those pics in the Tie thread from this game, and i cant tell you how much im looking forward to playing it. Im really glad lucas has allowed Shaak Ti to be used as we never saw her death in ep 3, hunting her shall be fun indeed :-)

Hmmmm perhaps this fella needs a place in the Tie Thread.......

[Scouty]

Hehee. Actually, Shaak Ti does die in Ep. 3, it's just not shown. Upon the rescue of the chancelor in the Battle over Corruscant, Shaak Ti goes to find which ship the Chancelor is on. She finds it, and is captured. Since General Grievous is on board the ship, Invisible Hand, I presume that General Grievous kills Shaak Ti for his love of killing jedi and collecting their lightsabers as trophies for his accomplishments.

Star Wars Referencing on!


The Force Unleashed on!

Quote

the BF thread

Which thread is that?

[Khorne]

Vader, on Apr 3 2007, 09:26 AM, said:

[...]
Hmmmm perhaps this fella needs a place in the Tie Thread.......

I'd rather have this girl on EB:

Would be much nicer, not >:-) ?

I can't wait for this game to be released. It just looks so friggin' awesome *sing* .
IGN page.<--Lots of info here *y* .

[mutley777]

ImperialScouts, on Apr 3 2007, 09:52 PM, said:

Hehee. Actually, Shaak Ti does die in Ep. 3, it's just not shown. Upon the rescue of the chancelor in the Battle over Corruscant, Shaak Ti goes to find which ship the Chancelor is on. She finds it, and is captured. Since General Grievous is on board the ship, Invisible Hand, I presume that General Grievous kills Shaak Ti for his love of killing jedi and collecting their lightsabers as trophies for his accomplishments.

Actually IS it has been widly discussed that Shaak Ti does not die as seen in the deleted scene. Here is a quote from the star wars databank.

Quote

Although her earlier death at Grievous' hands was completed and included on the DVD as a deleted scene, it should not be considered the canon version of her fate. This is because she is still visible later on in the movie as part of the Kashyyyk hologram. The deleted scene on the DVD, "General Grievous Slaughters a Jedi," should instead be considered an interesting look at what might have been.

Fixed some tags for you :-P - Starwars4J

[Vader]

mutley777, on Apr 3 2007, 11:04 PM, said:

Actually IS it has been widly discussed that Shaak Ti does not die as seen in the deleted scene. Here is a quote from the star wars databank.

Although her earlier death at Grievous' hands was completed and included on the DVD as a deleted scene, it should not be considered the canon version of her fate. This is because she is still visible later on in the movie as part of the Kashyyyk hologram. The deleted scene on the DVD, "General Grievous Slaughters a Jedi," should instead be considered an interesting look at what might have been.

Yep you are correct mutley, IS i think you need to get read more of the jedis fate :-P . Lucas decided that Shaak Ti should live and he also ordered that Quilon Vos be mentioned in the film.

So from what ive read it appears that Vaders apprentice might not be a willing one, its written that he wears a restraining device to make sure he serves vader.

Now it also appears that their keeping his name a secret so who do you guys reckon he is?

[Lord Thrawn]

Uncle Owen. Has to be. :-P

[White Lightning]

Wow, the art work for this game look really good, poor stormies, they look like they are getting badly hit!

[Scouty]

mutley777, on Apr 3 2007, 05:04 PM, said:

Actually IS it has been widly discussed that Shaak Ti does not die as seen in the deleted scene. Here is a quote from the star wars databank.
Fixed some tags for you :-P - Starwars4J

Ah! I see. Thanks for clearing up my wrongness X-D .

And this apprentice fellow is just a new, no-named Sith Apprentice. Most likely.

[Vader]

ImperialScouts, on Apr 5 2007, 03:16 PM, said:

Ah! I see. Thanks for clearing up my wrongness X-D .

And this apprentice fellow is just a new, no-named Sith Apprentice. Most likely.

You could be right on that one, but i do find it strange as to why they would hide it this long. Usually we get a characters name first then pics, not the other way around 8-°