Jump to content


New Bluetooth Receiver for Power Functions System


15 replies to this topic

#1 PetrXP

PetrXP

    Posts: 16
    Joined: 19-September 11
    Member: 20532
    Country: Czech republic

Posted 10 July 2012 - 02:06 PM

information about new Bluetooth receiver for Power Functions system you can find at this website

#2 funkdis

funkdis

    Posts: 38
    Joined: 16-June 12
    Member: 29212

Posted 10 July 2012 - 02:16 PM

View PostPetrXP, on 10 July 2012 - 02:06 PM, said:

information about new Bluetooth receiver for Power Functions system you can find at this website

This opens up a new weld of possibilities. Laptops, android and iOS devices will make use of it with apps.
Controlling things such as street lighting, movement of trains and monorail ... Mmm

Cannot wait, hopefully there will be something to integrate this with us 9v track guys :)

#3 eurotrash

eurotrash

    Posts: 274
    Joined: 30-January 12
    Member: 25286
    Country: Missouri

Posted 10 July 2012 - 03:15 PM

Excellant news!  I'm just sitting here thinking how I could use it.....the possibilities are endless.

#4 kyphur

kyphur

  • Going Postal with Maersk Madness!


    Posts: 572
    Joined: 09-June 10
    Member: 11374
    Country: US

Posted 10 July 2012 - 03:51 PM

Looks awesome but at $87 per unit that would be a costly train conversion!

I fear we'd be paying for a lot of features that would never be used in a train:

5 non-proportional connectors: I could see using  2, 1 for the lights and second 1 for custom features like doors etc..

3 proportional connectors, we'd only need 1 for our throttle.

Another issue I see with ths product is The connectors face the wires outward, if they were turned in then it would be easer to build into 6 wide trains.

Then there's the fact that the bottom is smooth and LEGO connection options are limited to using technic pins from below or the front/back.

The final issue (for trains) is that the device is 6 wide.

If they could make a scaled down version that had only 1 proportional & 2 non-proportional outputs, is 4 wide and the connector wires are routed toward on end instead of off all four sides which sold for about $30 then I'd be the first one here to convert all of my trains.

While the gyro is a cool feature I could do without it but if it could be in the cheaper "train" version then we could use it for automaticlly throttling up & down for slopes.

Edited by kyphur, 10 July 2012 - 05:18 PM.

Posted Image  Posted Image

Images are links

Here is my favorite BrickLink Store


#5 roamingstudio

roamingstudio

  • Blue train track Guinness World Record pusher extraordinaire


    Posts: 1097
    Joined: 21-January 10
    Member: 9215
    Country: Switzerland

Posted 10 July 2012 - 04:26 PM

On the news post
http://coredevelopersteam.com/news/

Quote

With this app Trains fans will be able to program (in time) train speed, deceleration, acceleration, suspension, railway switches, drawbridges, lights up the platforms, lighting of towns and villages. This app will also be used to program (in time) factories, refineries, funicular, robots, etc.


#6 SDH

SDH

    Posts: 40
    Joined: 24-March 12
    Member: 27496
    Country: USA

Posted 10 July 2012 - 10:06 PM

View Postkyphur, on 10 July 2012 - 03:51 PM, said:

I fear we'd be paying for a lot of features that would never be used in a train:
[...]
3 proportional connectors, we'd only need 1 for our throttle.

I was gonna say that I can see using the 3 proportional connectors to power superlong trains that require 2 or more engines to pull. Now that I think about it you could just gang your cables on top of the unit.

View Postkyphur, on 10 July 2012 - 03:51 PM, said:

Another issue I see with ths product is The connectors face the wires outward, if they were turned in then it would be easer to build into 6 wide trains.
[...]
If they could make a scaled down version that had only 1 proportional & 2 non-proportional outputs, is 4 wide and the connector wires are routed toward on end instead of off all four sides which sold for about $30 then I'd be the first one here to convert all of my trains.

I doubt that they would make one with less outputs that much cheaper, most of their costs must be in the bluetooth receiver. We can dream though... I would love to see the unit you described, hopefully they find it worth their while to put one out.
Posted Image

#7 kyphur

kyphur

  • Going Postal with Maersk Madness!


    Posts: 572
    Joined: 09-June 10
    Member: 11374
    Country: US

Posted 11 July 2012 - 02:53 AM

View PostSDH, on 10 July 2012 - 10:06 PM, said:

I doubt that they would make one with less outputs that much cheaper, most of their costs must be in the bluetooth receiver. We can dream though... I would love to see the unit you described, hopefully they find it worth their while to put one out.

I know $30 is probably wishful thinking but maybe $50 would be obtainable? It's just that with the quantities we'd buy the price would have to be ess and it should also be better suited for our building environment (fit inside 6 wide bodies). Maybe they would give bulk discounts so a train club could get together and order 20 or more at a time for savings of $5 per unit.

Posted Image  Posted Image

Images are links

Here is my favorite BrickLink Store


#8 SDH

SDH

    Posts: 40
    Joined: 24-March 12
    Member: 27496
    Country: USA

Posted 12 July 2012 - 03:43 AM

View Postkyphur, on 11 July 2012 - 02:53 AM, said:

I know $30 is probably wishful thinking but maybe $50 would be obtainable? It's just that with the quantities we'd buy the price would have to be ess and it should also be better suited for our building environment (fit inside 6 wide bodies). Maybe they would give bulk discounts so a train club could get together and order 20 or more at a time for savings of $5 per unit.
I completely agree with you, and you might have an angle on bulk discounts.
Posted Image

#9 PetrXP

PetrXP

    Posts: 16
    Joined: 19-September 11
    Member: 20532
    Country: Czech republic

Posted 12 July 2012 - 09:45 AM

View Postkyphur, on 10 July 2012 - 03:51 PM, said:

If they could make a scaled down version that had only 1 proportional & 2 non-proportional outputs, is 4 wide and the connector wires are routed toward on end instead of off all four sides which sold for about $30 then I'd be the first one here to convert all of my trains.



freakwawe has truht: "The price, well I think it is not too much out of range. BT receivers are not that cheap, around 20 EUR."

from this discussion

Edited by PetrXP, 12 July 2012 - 09:45 AM.


#10 kyphur

kyphur

  • Going Postal with Maersk Madness!


    Posts: 572
    Joined: 09-June 10
    Member: 11374
    Country: US

Posted 12 July 2012 - 02:16 PM

View PostPetrXP, on 12 July 2012 - 09:45 AM, said:

freakwawe has truht: "The price, well I think it is not too much out of range. BT receivers are not that cheap, around 20 EUR."

from this discussion

Maybe it isn't time for a BT receiver in every train then. I like the idea of using my iPad tondrive my trains but not at $100 (after shipping) per train.

Maybe a hybrid solution would be best for the time being:

BT to RF device? This would allow cheaper RF receivers in our trains and only require 1 BT transceiver. For a low cost solution coms to the train could be 1 way only requiring a receiver in the train or a more expensive option would be RF transceivers in the train so that itncould report back to the base which would ofmcourse relay the info to the phone/tablet.

Of course the rf receivers/transceivers would need to be addressable but that's just a little bit of data in transmission (id prefix)

Posted Image  Posted Image

Images are links

Here is my favorite BrickLink Store


#11 AndyC

AndyC

    Posts: 1107
    Joined: 23-June 09
    Member: 6485

Posted 12 July 2012 - 10:15 PM

View PostPetrXP, on 12 July 2012 - 09:45 AM, said:

freakwawe has truht: "The price, well I think it is not too much out of range. BT receivers are not that cheap, around 20 EUR."

from this discussion

The actual Bluetooth receiver chips themselves aren't nearly that expensive, you can get them for a couple of Euros each without even buying in bulk. The custom molded casing is probably considerably more expensive. I still think there'd be much more call for a simpler, smaller device that could be produced a lot cheaper and would probably sell in bigger quantities too.
Posted Image

#12 clcwong

clcwong

    Posts: 116
    Joined: 18-August 08
    Member: 3752

Posted 14 July 2012 - 02:38 PM

what is non proportional?

Maybe we could build one with off the shelf bluetooth module n a simple microchip. :devil:

#13 Legotom

Legotom

    Posts: 14
    Joined: 11-June 12
    Member: 29115
    Country: Scotland

Posted 14 July 2012 - 04:12 PM

View Postclcwong, on 14 July 2012 - 02:38 PM, said:

what is non proportional?


Proportional means that you can control the power coming out. So it gives you speed steps like the current Lego PF controller. Non-proportional is just on or off, so good for lights.

#14 Rob Klingberg

Rob Klingberg

    Posts: 56
    Joined: 09-October 10
    Member: 13681
    Country: USA

Posted 30 July 2012 - 04:26 PM

Does anyone plan to purchase one of these (or has anyone already)?  I'd be interested to see how it actually performs, quality of construction, battery life, etc.  Also very interested to see how they implemented the PF connectors-- doesn't Lego have a lock on design for those elements (plugs, connectors, etc.)?  I thought the PF intellectual property was licensed for non-commercial use only.


Overall, it does look like a promising new accessory.

--Rob

#15 Phoxtane

Phoxtane

    Posts: 268
    Joined: 28-May 12
    Member: 28870
    Country: USA

Posted 31 July 2012 - 03:11 AM

I believe the designers of the product were focusing on those who build Technic-themed MOCs; thus, the many proportional and non-proportional connectors. While I find the unit itself to be intriguing, I won't be buying one because they are enormously expensive!
"991. "Kiww the Wabbit" is not a proper viking battlecry."

#16 kyphur

kyphur

  • Going Postal with Maersk Madness!


    Posts: 572
    Joined: 09-June 10
    Member: 11374
    Country: US

Posted 31 July 2012 - 09:42 AM

I certianly won't buy it in the current form as it simply isn't practical for train building unless you’re building like 10 wide...

Posted Image  Posted Image

Images are links

Here is my favorite BrickLink Store




Reply to this topic



  


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users