Technic NOOB : What to buy ?
#1
Posted 24 April 2012 - 02:31 AM
Anyway, I picked up a couple of power functions pieces (motor kit, AAA battery box, a couple IR receivers, the remote, and a gear/axle set from Klutz), but am finding I don't have enough parts to do a whole lot. I'm at the point where I'd like to pick up a few sets over the Spring and Summer. Mid term - I'd like to build a basic config that can be used as a simple RC vehicle (forward/reverse/steering) and longer term, NXT is in my future.
So, first set choice - 8110 (Unimog) or 9397 (Logging Truck)? The Unimog seems more likely to disappear in the near term. I looked at the latest supercar (8070), but it didn't get me as excited... Any thoughts one way or the other? Am I missing out on a better option for someone just getting into Technic? Are there any good kits to buy so that I have parts like a differential, bevel gears, the one piece gear box I've seen around, worm drive, etc? I'm close to zero in terms of Technic parts, so buying individual pieces would be pretty time consuming. Ebay bulk Technic lots could be an option.
Thanks,
Mark
#2
Posted 24 April 2012 - 02:49 AM
To learn all about Lego Power Functions, I recommend reviewing the "Frequently Asked Questions" and answers on the official Powerfunctions website.

The 8110 Unimog U400 set should still be available into Summer 2013 (since "flagship" Lego Technic sets like it are available for about 2 years on Shop.Lego.com ). The 9397 Logging Truck should be available until the end of 2013. Buying the NEEDED parts from Bricklink.com may be better than buying $140-$200 sets.
#3
Posted 24 April 2012 - 04:14 AM
Imho, if you can find one for a good price, the best set for new Technic builders is the 8258 Crane Truck. It has lots of pieces, a nice assortment of gears, 8 tires, and a couple linear actuators. This was the first Technic set I purchased when I exited my "dark ages", and it's still my favorite set that I have.
Also, like Dluders mentioned, bricklink may be a good place for you to purchase parts you need.
#4
Posted 24 April 2012 - 04:49 AM
dhc6twinotter, on 24 April 2012 - 04:14 AM, said:
Also, like Dluders mentioned, bricklink may be a good place for you to purchase parts you need.
#5
Posted 24 April 2012 - 05:14 AM
8070 supercar is really nice too just from a parts selection, so while you may not like it grabbing it on sale to build different stuff out of it wouldn't be a bad idea. it has everything you need to build almost any style of car.
#7
Posted 24 April 2012 - 02:50 PM
#9
Posted 24 April 2012 - 03:42 PM

Rumble is Red,Frenzy is Blue,
On Decepticon Cypertron,
Poem writes you!
My current project: ETF HTX-380, on Brickshelf, and Eurobricks.
#11
Posted 24 April 2012 - 09:41 PM
tim
#13
Posted 24 April 2012 - 10:28 PM
you can always supplement your inventory with other sets, or you can purchase many individual elements directly from lego or from private sellers at bricklink.com. at bricklink, you will find discontinued and hard-to-find elements not available from lego directly.
KEvron
Edited by KEvron, 24 April 2012 - 10:33 PM.
#14
Posted 24 April 2012 - 10:31 PM
KEvron, on 24 April 2012 - 10:28 PM, said:
KEvron
LOL.. I agree, might as well get it out of the way now...
#15
Posted 24 April 2012 - 10:45 PM
Paul Boratko, on 24 April 2012 - 10:31 PM, said:
YOU!!1! you young upstarts and your newfangled elements!
don't get me wrong, the new elements allow for lines which were near impossible with the traditional elements. your own sexy mocs give testament to that. i've gone on ad naseum opining about the design shift; i'd prefer a healthy mix of both old and new, as seen in sets from early last decade. as it is now, the theme has evolved into something of a lego-compatible line, and to lego's own detriment, i believe. the line between technic and system has become so well defined that they risk the loss of cross-over appeal.
KEvron
#20
Posted 03 May 2012 - 06:24 PM
skylinedan, on 03 May 2012 - 05:48 PM, said:
i've got news for you; it was my wife, at the time, who got me back into lego.
btw, "your" is a possesive adjective; "you're" is the contraction required for your predicate.
KEvron
Edited by KEvron, 03 May 2012 - 06:28 PM.
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











