Jump to content


Review: 21013 Big Ben

Review Architecture Reviewers Academy 21013 Big Ben

57 replies to this topic

Poll: Review: 21013 Big Ben (74 member(s) have cast votes)

How do you rate this set?

  1. Poor (3 votes [4.05%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.05%

  2. Below Average (5 votes [6.76%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.76%

  3. Average (21 votes [28.38%])

    Percentage of vote: 28.38%

  4. Above Average (30 votes [40.54%])

    Percentage of vote: 40.54%

  5. Outstanding (15 votes [20.27%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.27%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Rufus

Rufus

  • Schnell! Schnell! Kartoffelkopf!


    Posts: 4983
    Joined: 15-July 09
    Member: 6705
    Country: England

Posted 19 April 2012 - 10:58 PM

Posted Image
Posted Image

It's wonderful to see that The LEGO Group's confidence in the Architecture Series has increased enough for worldwide landmarks to appear!  :cry_happy:  In what might seem opportunistic timing, with the fast approaching 2012 Olympics being held in London, TLG has revealed that its latest Architecture set will model what is probably London's most iconic landmark: the clock tower of Big Ben.

As has been pointed out innumerable times, Big Ben is actually the name of the huge bell which resides within the tower, itself forming the north-west corner of the Palace of Westminster; the tower itself is known simply as the Clock Tower.  But if you say 'Big Ben', I imagine people from around the world will immediately picture this famous tower.

This review is a team effort by Pandora and myself (with a little extra help from a certain someone at a crucial point :wink: ).   The opinions presented here are ours; fortunately we agreed on pretty much everything so there was little need for discussion!  :laugh:

Anyway, with further ado, Pandora and Rufus are proud to present....


Review:  21013 Big Ben

Set Information


Name:  Big Ben
Number:  21013
Theme:  Architecture (Landmark Series)
Release:  1 June 2012
Parts:  341 (our count)
Price:  US $29.99  |  EUR 29.99  |  CAD $39.99


Links  ...  Brickset ... LEGO Architecture
We'll update the price information, links and the official set description as they become available.


The Box

Posted Image

The smart but rather austere box livery of the Architecture range continues with this set.  I see no reason to change it!  :wub:  Big Ben sits atop a technical drawing which may well represent architectural plans of the Palace of Westminster, but who's checking.  :snicker:  The eagle-eyed among you might note that this latest addition to the Architecture range is designed not by Adam Reed Tucker, but instead by Rok Zgalin Kobe, a Slovenian architect.


The back of the box is more colourful, sporting a scale render of the model, with some pictures of the real building in atypical English weather:

Posted Image

The text is a language lesson describing the enclosed booklet, which is in English, and mentions the two Architects of the tower, Charles Barry and Augustus Pugin.


The narrow sides are well suited to a tall, narrow model, and allow the boxes to be stacked on shelves vertically.  The left side features a beautiful low-down shot of the tower:

Posted Image Posted Image

... while the right side, which forms the flap of the box lid, shows an interesting 'exploded' render of the model beside the 'Choking Hazard' warning in a vast array of international languages.

A very small part-rendered picture graces the top of the box,  and the bottom reveals that parts were sourced in DENMARK, HUNGARY, MEXICO, and the CZECH REPUBLIC.  We suspect this represents different manufacturing sources for different regions.


Interestingly, this set - despite being considerably larger - comes in a box no bigger than those of the smallest sets in the range.  It is of identical size to 21002 Empire State Building, or 21000 Willis (formerly Sears) Tower, Chicago, pictured here:

Posted Image

It is, as you might imagine, considerably heavier, and clearly requires two extra years of building experience to build it.  :wink:


Contents

We love these Architecture boxes!  :wub:  There's a certain sense of nostalgia for the days of intricate packaging which heightened the whole LEGO experience.  Admittedly these don't have the (expensive, we've no doubt) plastic inserts and lifting lids of the 80s, but it's clear that TLG have gone to some pains to make the box as collectable as the set.  You can even flatpack the box for longevity without tearing or cutting!

The box is almost as smart on the inside:

Posted Image

This one is remarkably full, which helps to preserve the instruction manual.  You are instructed clearly to 'Enjoy your building experience.' as you open the lid.  It's a really nice touch, and emphasises the lengths TLG has gone to to maximise the ... um ... building experience. :blush:


Out of the box are pulled four polybags, and two loose plates.  As Siegfried/Sinner mentioned in the Sydney Opera House review, it's a shame that not all of the parts are bagged, but we can't really blame LEGO for this in this case.  It's only two pieces, and would probably require much larger bags, which might in turn necessitate a larger box to allow automated packing.  

Posted Image

Looking at this picture, you immediately get a sense of the rather small parts variety - there are only 33 different pieces in the set, including different colours of the same part.


Instructions

Posted Image

Some serious thought has gone into this instruction manual.  It is quite thick, and beautifully presented, being printed on high quality paper, like all the sets in the Architecture range.  Aside from the difference in orientation, the cover is similar to the box front, but does reference the Architecture website.


The rear cover of the manual features an alternative view of the tower from behind:

Posted Image

but is otherwise rather plain.


Most of the interest is contained inside the manual, where can be found ten pages of facts about the tower and its construction, an example of which is shown here:

Posted Image

The text is superbly written.  It is a potted history, packed with facts and interesting to read, without being a daunting mass of text.  We learned quite a lot ourselves!  


Following the tower facts comes a double-paged biography of the architects:

Posted Image

The pictures here are reprints of oil portraits of the long-departed designers of the tower.  Again, kudos to LEGO for going the extra mile to add interest and value.


The instructions themselves are clear, and nicely paced to avoid confusion without being patronising.  About every eight or nine pages is a little inset depicting further little factoids about the building:

Posted Image

It's easy to miss these, if you are concentrating on the building.  We'd recommend taking your time when building, and enjoying these little tidbits of information when you encounter them!  They are a really nice touch.

Otherwise, there are some parts in similar colours (particularly black and dark bluish grey), which could cause confusion; however, if you follow the build order then there shouldn't be any problems.  You would notice if you used a dark bluish grey 1x2 tile on the base, for instance (unless you're building in the dark :tongue: ).


Towards the rear of the manual is the now-standard parts inventory:

Posted Image

Again, the small variety of parts is readily apparent, and belies the size of the set.


Finally, we are treated to a discourse from the Artist himself, and an intriguing look at Architecture in the early days of LEGO (including the invention of the plate!)

Posted Image

We're pleased to note that Rok Zgalin Kobe refers to SNOT (Studs Not On Top), implying it's the acronym used by LEGO designers themselves!  :wub:  We're easily pleased. :blush:


The Parts

But enough about paper, what about the plastic?  We've arranged the parts according to the polybag they came in, which is roughly dictated by size.


The largest bag contains the large tiles, including the unique printed 'Big Ben' piece, and a sea of tan.

Posted Image

Most of these parts are commonplace; even the 2x2 clock face is often found at the Pick-a-Brick wall.  Of note are the dark bluish grey 'Slope 45 1x2 Double', found in two other sets, and the 'Slope 75 2x2x2 Quadruple Convex' in DBG and the two earth green 2x3 Plates, each found only in one other set.  Not rare, though useful, are the nine 1x1 bricks with four studs ('dalek pieces', as we've heard them called).


Generally, part variety is small but quantity high:

Posted Image

We're certainly not complaining about the 57 round bricks and 32 grille tiles in tan, useful for architectural MOCs.  :wub:


2x1 tan plates were at the PaB wall recently, so we're not short of those...

Posted Image

... but jumper plates are always useful.


Finally, we have the ubiquitous round 1x1 plates, and 1x1 tiles in tan are most welcome.

Posted Image

Not a cheese wedge in sight!  :oh:  Overall, it's a part selection that won't get too many people excited, with only a small number of rare elements, although the quantity of some of the parts might make this useful as a parts pack.


The Build

Let's put these plastic blocks together!  :excited:  As you might expect, we start with the familiar Architecture base:

Posted Image

Immediately, you can see by the jumper plates that the model uses a half-stud offset for the entire structure.   This is presumably to centre the model, which is an odd number of studs in length.  The jumpers make a surprisingly strong connection, meaning you can build the model whilst holding it, rather than on a flat surface, although it's worth noting that the two black plates at the base are only connnected via three tiles, giving them a tendency to separate slightly if you do do this.  :blush:


The 'trick' behind the SNOT wall detail is revealed in this shot:

Posted Image

SNOT bricks - with 1 (white), 2 (light bluish grey) and 4 (black) studs on sides are used to attach 1x2 plate-grille tile pieces to give the sides their ridged detail.  The 'gap' that remains under the grilles is filled with 1x1 tiles.  This technique is a little fiddly, but surprisingly strong and effective, and is used throughout the model.


For the second layer, rinse, and repeat... well, nearly.

Posted Image

Here you can see that only black 'dalek' pieces have been used to add SNOT to the sides, rather than the two-sided stud pieces.  Although this might at first glance seem odd - it prevents adding 1x1 bricks in between, which might weaken the structure - there are two reasons for this.  One is that the side-facing studs are also used in some places - to hold SNOT tiling at the side, and the mysterious upward-pointing dark bluish grey tile you can see here - and the second is that the 'open stud' on the top of the dalek pieces is required to attach the roof at a half stud offset (similar to the use of technic 1x1 bricks in the White House, or Empire State Building)


With the roof-pieces attached, the odd DBG tile fills a gap caused by the half-stud offset :thumbup: :

Posted Image

As we add height to the tower, things get a little repetitive, with three identical layers to construct.


As we approach the top of the tower, four single-stud SNOT pieces are added which will hold the clock faces:

Posted Image

And here we can have a nice look at the rear of the building :grin: .


Finally, the rather intricate roof is built:

Posted Image

And we're done!  The build takes about 30 minutes if you're rushing, or an hour if you're leisurely (and read the history while you're at it).  It's a little fiddly in places (making sure the 1x1 tiles sit squarely is a pain, but this is always a problem), and gets a bit repetitive, but being a smallish model this is counteracted by the feeling of the tower taking shape.  Some of the SNOT techniques, especially the roof, are a nice surprise.


The Complete Set

Now let's take a look at the finished article.  :drool:  Big Ben stands proud and erect in all his slightly phallic glory:  :snicker:

Posted Image

This angle shows clearly how effective the half-stud offset is at centering the tower.  We like the use of the SNOT grille-tiles for adding the ridged detail which is crucial for adding realism, and the differentiation between the various levels of the building is brought about quite neatly and simply by the use of 1x1 bricks or round bricks at various points.  It's highly effective.  :thumbup:

Now, let's get this out of the way: the major flaw of this set is the clock faces, which stand proud of the tower by two plates, unlike the real clocks which are if anything slightly recessed.  This is a product of the designer's decision to make the entire building three studs wide, which is necessary to make the building affordable, keep consistency with the rest of the Landmark Series, and itself makes the build more interesting in places.  Moreover, the design of the 2x2 round tile on which the clock sits - with a cross in the centre of the underside, rather than an anti-stud - necessitates the use of the extra 2x2 plate, therefore exacerbating the problem.

A possible solution to this would be to build the clock section of the tower in four-studs wide, at a half-stud offset.  One day we'll try this.  Maybe the designer did, but chose this method in the end.  :def_shrug:


Now that's out of the way, let's continue enjoying the view.  Here's the rear:

Posted Image

The tower (obviously) looks the same from every angle, but here you get a view of the snippet of the rest of Palace of Westminster.  It's 'cut off' from the rest of the building; the blank tiles/bricks indicate where the building would continue: here, and on the left side.  Note the 1x1 round plates instead of cones at the rear: this approximates to a real feature of the building, which doesn't have spires on the inward facing parapets.


Side views (left and right respectively):

Posted ImagePosted Image

The left side features a little dark green, representing a small lawn area in front of the tower where politicians and press gather from time to time.  Note again the cut-off where the building would continue to the river edge.  The right side faces Parliament Square, where the tower sits flush with the edge of the Palace.  :thumbup:



Finally, a shot representing the most common view of the tower:

Posted Image

Another slight niggle, and again due to the use of the three-wide scale, is that the lower part of the roof doesn't slope particularly gracefully, but the use of round studs is probably the best compromise the designer could achieve.


Comparison

Now lets compare the set to the real thing.  Being rather camera-shy, Pandora and I grabbed an unsuspecting random American tourist to help with these shots.  :grin_wub:

Posted Image

The model is rather small (as is the LEGO set :snicker: ) making direct comparison difficult.  It's approximately 1:350 scale, after all.  Still, you can see that the overall impression of the model is pretty accurate, which we think is as good as could be achieved at this scale.


Getting both the tower and the model in focus together was nigh-on impossible. This is about the best we could do:

Posted Image

The blocky roof isn't so noticeable here; unfortunately, the sticky-outy clock faces are.  :sad:   But the time is uncannily correct.  :oh:



Our contract with the Random American Tourist demanded more than just one picture:

Posted Image

:grin:


He made himself useful, and got us into the London Eye for some aerial views:

Posted Image

Well, we'd love a massive Architecture set of the entire Palace of Westminster, but that isn't going to happen anytime soon...


... so here's a shot focused on Big Ben himself, from a similar angle as the last set picture:

Posted Image

We should mention here an interesting observation.  On the way out of the London Eye is a gift shop filled with souvenirs (many relating to the forthcoming Olympics).  This (and many other souvenir shops around the area) would be an ideal place to sell this set - it'll appeal to chance customers who wouldn't normally even consider buying LEGO.  The set makes a great souvenir - it is instantly recognisable, despite its flaws, and this market would perhaps be rather more forgiving than the average AFOL.  We hope TLG have already thought of this.  


Conclusion

Posted Image
Bus and Grenadier Guard not supplied with set.

We were a little disappointed when we saw the preliminary pictures, but having seen the set 'in the flesh', as it were, we think this is actually rather a nice set.  Sure, the protruding clock-faces aren't ideal, but they're certainly better than stickers, and the flaw is balanced by the level of detailing which is astonishing for such a small scale.

Moreover, if the preliminary prices are correct, this set represents far better value than most of the smaller Architecture sets, and perhaps hints that the line is firmly hitting the mainstream.  

The Big Ben set, together with its attractive packaging and informative manual, makes a wonderful collectors' item, and indeed potentially a lucrative souvenir piece (if TLG takes our advice on this :grin: ).  I'm sure they've already thought of this, as the timing of its release with the 2012 Olympics hints.

A larger-scale model might allow more detail, solve the clock problem, and enable perhaps a bit of gold decoration on the tower; but would restrict the target market to the die-hard LEGO fans.  Perhaps TLG have deliberately decided to accept the smaller scale compromise; we think that, overall, the set is pretty good for the scale.  :thumbup:

Design 8  Were it not for the clock faces, we'd give this 10.  It's remarkably detailed for the scale.
Build 9  A pleasing build, sometimes a little repetitive, but with some interesting features along the way.  If you follow the manual carefully, it is an enjoyable experience.
Parts 7  It's not really a set for rare part hunters, but might appeal as a parts pack if you need tan grille tiles or round bricks.
Value 8  We haven't seen the UK price yet, but going by the US and European pricing, this does seem to be better value than many of the smaller Architecture sets.


Overall  8/10  Big Ben might not appeal to die-hard sticklers for accuracy, but it's a detailed and recognisable rendition of what is perhaps London's most iconic landmark.  We were rather pleasantly surprised.  :thumbup:


Thanks for reading!  We hope you enjoyed the review.  Many thanks to CopMike for making this possible, TLG for allowing us an  early look at the set, and Hinckley for being such a good model!  :wub:

Pandora and Rufus.

More pictures on flickr.

Edited by Rufus, 02 March 2013 - 02:38 PM.
Tags Adjusted


#2 caperberry

caperberry

    Posts: 352
    Joined: 24-February 12
    Member: 26894
    Country: UK

Posted 19 April 2012 - 11:46 PM

Great review and great to see it by the real thing! You did well with the pictures. Well I wasn't expecting Random American Tourist.
You've even managed to make me look beyond the clock face design, which look even worse now seen side on.
I would LOVE to finish off the rest of the building at this scale!
Hopefully the UK price won't be inflated.

Edited by caperberry, 19 April 2012 - 11:46 PM.

Posted Image

#3 lightningtiger

lightningtiger

  • Doing the Chicken Dance


    Posts: 18556
    Joined: 28-October 09
    Member: 7997
    Country: Australia

Posted 19 April 2012 - 11:59 PM

Excellent review, now this looks more like Big Ben than the Opera House set looked to the real thing. :wink:
I like this a lot, might be my first one of this kind of Lego sets....I did say might, depends on the price. :blush:

#4 Big Cam

Big Cam

  • A good mood, too.


    Posts: 13999
    Joined: 02-April 09
    Member: 5701
    Country: USA

Posted 20 April 2012 - 12:00 AM

A fantastic review, I swear the images look even better than the pre release ones.

The cameo adds you know humor.  :sweet:

#5 Alasdair Ryan

Alasdair Ryan

  • Technic Hall of Fame Editor


    Posts: 4968
    Joined: 22-November 09
    Member: 8292
    Country: Scotland

Posted 20 April 2012 - 12:10 AM

You made a great review.:thumbup:
I wonder if the price is quite high because of all those tan bricks,I would hazzard a guess that you might be able to build it a bit cheaper if you ordered the bricks from Bricklink, thirty pounds seems very expensive compered to what you could find in a technic set for the same price.:sweet:

Edit


Some quick bricklink search's later and i have found out that you could buy all the bits for about $20 dollers - £12 uk pounds,of course all that info you get in the booklet will be a good history lesson for some of you too so some of you might want to get this to read.

Edited by Alasdair Ryan, 20 April 2012 - 01:43 AM.

Posted Image

Updated 02/08/12
Posted Image

#6 JackJonespaw

JackJonespaw

  • Help Me Build Hogwarts!


    Posts: 2095
    Joined: 12-June 11
    Member: 18405
    Country: U.S.A.

Posted 20 April 2012 - 12:18 AM

Nice review! I love this newest Architecture set. The detail is great!

#7 LEGO Guy Bri

LEGO Guy Bri

    Posts: 2872
    Joined: 28-October 10
    Member: 13958
    Country: X

Posted 20 April 2012 - 12:36 AM

Great review, very enlightening. I too, am a little off on the clock faces jutting out, as they do. I would b more impressed if it was given a special more detailed clock face, as well. The old clock is needs an update of a little more detail and this would have been a perfect set for it. Still it is a very nice model   Posted Image
-I don't tell you how to tell me what to do, so don't you tell me how to do what you told me to do... I know when to use finesse

#8 Hinckley

Hinckley

  • Jesus F R A C


    Posts: 29200
    Joined: 15-September 05
    Member: 486
    Country: Chicago, USA

Posted 20 April 2012 - 12:41 AM

View PostAlasdair Ryan, on 20 April 2012 - 12:10 AM, said:

Nice review i am guessing the price is quite high because of those tan bricks,I would hazzard a guess that you could properly build it a bit cheaper if you ordered the bricks from Bricklink.
Are you posting from your phone? :sceptic: Please try not to be so sloppy in posting. We like to preserve language when we can. I'm not trying to pick on you, but I know you're a frequent contributor and I'd appreciate some attention paid to grammar.

As far as the postulation that you could build this set cheaper via bricklink; have you done the research to prove that or are you just hazarding a guess? It'd be great to see the research. Honestly, I'd like to see if these sets could be built cheaper. I'm not trying to pick a fight. I actually wonder if ordering all of these parts and getting them shipped would actually make an enormous difference.

These sets are made for a higher end tourism market, anyway. This research would be best to discern for fans what the value is. Can we assess some value in the lovely booklet with all the history of the site, the architecture's trademark costs and supporting fellow AFOLs? Random postulations are fun, but what if they were backed up by half the work the reviewers have put in?

New Member? Read This | Questions? Need Help? Ask Here
Site Guidelines | Eurobricks FAQ | Visual User Guide


#9 daisy

daisy

  • Sci-Fi E.G.G. Counter


    Posts: 136
    Joined: 11-April 12
    Member: 27893
    Country: U.S.A.

Posted 20 April 2012 - 12:55 AM

Thanks for the review! So glad to hear it is approved by those familiar with the landmark.  

This seems like a really nice price range, with useful parts.  

The instruction book is lovely and makes the set worth it - even if you could come buy the parts cheaper elsewhere.

Great review - and another set to add to my growing list.

Edited by daisy, 20 April 2012 - 12:56 AM.


#10 Darkdragon

Darkdragon

  • Destroyed Dreams of Super-Santa


    Posts: 5030
    Joined: 22-November 10
    Member: 14331
    Country: USA

Posted 20 April 2012 - 01:05 AM

Great (and hilarious) review you guys.  This set is really cute. I don't have any of the Architecture line yet but one of these days I hope to pick a few up.

I've never seen the real place, so thanks so much for all the photos of both the model and the real thing. It's always nice to see the comparison right in the review.

New Member? Read This | Questions? Need Help? Ask Here

Site Guidelines | Eurobricks FAQ | Visual User Guide | Tutorials


Posted ImagePosted ImageLearn how to make comics & animation: Brick Flicks & Comics Academy Posted Image Posted Image


#11 Hewman

Hewman

  • I am Vigilance!


    Posts: 1376
    Joined: 03-April 07
    Member: 1497
    Country: ...

Posted 20 April 2012 - 01:43 AM

That's the best review I've read in a long time. Well done to you all.
The seit is a big improvement on the Sydney Opera House. To me a lot of the beauty of Big Ben is in the clock face so that regular Lego clock tile really bothers me. There are some fun building techniques and I think the designer did one of the best jobs I've seen in the Architecture line. I just can't get over the clock which my eyes are drawn to every time I see it.

#12 Nightshroud99

Nightshroud99

    Posts: 1240
    Joined: 03-October 09
    Member: 7668
    Country: Canada

Posted 20 April 2012 - 01:48 AM

Man I want this set :drool: I think it's very well done except for the clock, and the build seems very enjoyable.

Now I'm really looking forward to it's June release, thanks for the review Rufus, Pandora and Hinckey.
My YouTube Channel! 20,000 subscribers and growing! I review LEGO!
http://www.youtube.c...r/Nightshroud99

#13 ShaydDeGrai

ShaydDeGrai

  • Moldy Expert


    Posts: 452
    Joined: 28-February 12
    Member: 26992
    Country: USA

Posted 20 April 2012 - 01:57 AM

Excellent review.  Thanks for sharing.  The protruding clock faces have been a sore point for me ever since I saw the first photos to come out of the toy fair (I'm one of those die-hards who'd gladly pay more for a slightly larger model with recessed faces) but now I think I'll pick this one up anyway; other than the top of the tower, it looks like a fine addition to the line.


Posted Image


#14 Si-MOCs

Si-MOCs

  • SPACESHIP! SPACESHIP! SPACESHIP!


    Posts: 2969
    Joined: 13-March 11
    Member: 16567
    Country: ▒♠▒

Posted 20 April 2012 - 03:26 AM

Wow... LEGO is really show'n the love these days... even shipping models for reviews.  :laugh:

Great review... I think you actually sold me on the set !  :thumbup:


Great job on the set!
Posted Image Posted Image  Posted Image Posted Image
I'd seek professional help - but I spent the money on LEGO. | flickr

New Member? Read This | Questions? Need Help? Ask Here

Site Guidelines | Eurobricks FAQ | Visual User Guide


#15 Niku

Niku

  • Wants two initials


    Posts: 1469
    Joined: 26-December 10
    Member: 14912
    Country: Guatemala

Posted 20 April 2012 - 03:36 AM

Thanks for the review Rufus and Pandora.  :thumbup:
And Hinckley too.
Liking much the final model, I think this might be the first architecture model I´ll get, that if arrives here.
In any case the way is built will be a new and interesting experience.

Posted Image


Spoiler


#16 Rick

Rick

  • Wants to be important too! (but already is)


    Posts: 7607
    Joined: 11-February 09
    Member: 5261
    Country: The Netherlands

Posted 20 April 2012 - 06:42 AM

Lovely review. :wub_drool:  Great pictures, insightful and humorous (as always :wink: ). I really like all the half-stud offsetting: it seems essential to the looks of the finished model. I'm afraid the "clock problem" can't really be solved easily. If you'd make the structure four studs wide, the sections of the tower need to be vertically stretched as well, which might not work out well with the dimensions of the 1 x 2 grille tiles. Overall, it seems like a really nice compromise in terms of level of detail, nice building techniques, and piece count/price.

#17 Peppermint_M

Peppermint_M

  • A few backspaces will do


    Posts: 7520
    Joined: 21-December 08
    Member: 4757
    Country: Wales.

Posted 20 April 2012 - 07:30 AM

One day, one day I will have space to display those sets and Big Ben is certainly on the list! Thanks for the review guys, it was fab!

If there was no such thing as science; you'd be right.


New Member? Read This | Questions? Need Help? Ask Here

Site Guidelines | Eurobricks FAQ | Visual User Guide | Tutorials


Tesni Hightribe


#18 Kim Thomsen

Kim Thomsen

  • Feed me!!


    Posts: 244
    Joined: 15-March 12
    Member: 27336
    Country: Denmark

Posted 20 April 2012 - 07:48 AM

Super review.
Great to see that random tourist was able to help you out with the pics :laugh:
I'll make sure to pass this around. :thumbup:

#19 mrklaw

mrklaw

    Posts: 354
    Joined: 04-November 10
    Member: 14078

Posted 20 April 2012 - 08:30 AM

Great review.

If you wanted to expand and build more of the palace, do you think it'd be cheaper to buy multiple sets, or bulk order tan bricks from bricklink?

Think this will be my first architecture set.

Edited by mrklaw, 20 April 2012 - 09:05 AM.


#20 conchology

conchology

    Posts: 54
    Joined: 17-August 11
    Member: 19829
    Country: Philippines

Posted 20 April 2012 - 08:54 AM

Great review, well done. This set is a welcome addition to the architecture series.   :thumbup:

#21 der seb

der seb

  • 300th Town Forum Reviewer!


    Posts: 134
    Joined: 24-May 07
    Member: 1610
    Country: Germany

Posted 20 April 2012 - 09:08 AM

Thank You for the review!
Seems like a nice set.

I tried to build it with MLCad and got over two problems I couldn't make out from your pictures:

1) Is the arrangement of the (darker) bricks in the second floor correct?
2) Is there any plate inside the eight round tan plates? (same situation below the clocks, too)
Posted Image

This was the only way I found to get the 57th round brick inside the model.

-
Sebastian
My Renders:
Posted Image

#22 -GZ-

-GZ-

    Posts: 209
    Joined: 09-January 10
    Member: 8976
    Country: Russia

Posted 20 April 2012 - 11:24 AM

Thanks for the great review! In my opinion the set is quite beautiful, again except the clock.  :sad: I think that it would be better to make the tower less detailed without any clock parts (well.. just like in my Spasskaya Tower  :blush:) or maybe even detailed stickers with gold decoration pattern (the set is meant to be displayed, so the stickers applied directly to the top part without any SNOT parts here wouldn't bother as much as these clock parts!!)
Have you ever seen LEGO... ROMAN EMPERORS? COMPOSITE CAPITALS? ARCHES? BAROQUE? Use the links! Comment on Flickr!

I'm from Russia - sorry for my English) * -GZ- is a member of Doublebrick (Russian LEGO fans community) since August 2006.

#23 rriggs

rriggs

    Posts: 787
    Joined: 15-June 08
    Member: 3307
    Country: UK

Posted 20 April 2012 - 12:12 PM

Nice review - and well done for nabbing a tourist to use as a model!

It's a shame that the scale has meant the clock faces sit so proud of the tower.  For me that's enough to put me off from buying this set.  I understand why they ended up at that scale with the tower 3-wide but someone at some point during design and development should have said that the standard 2x2 clock faces don't work.  At that point they could have switched to stickers(!) or printed pieces.  Even at this scale, simply switching to 2x2 square tiles printed or stickered would have pulled the clock faces in to the tower a bit.

They could have moulded a 3x3x3 brick just for the purpose printed with intricate clock faces on four sides  :tongue:  That would have been one for the collectors to seek out in years to come!!

It's a shame.

Anyway, I'm now looking forward to whoever it is that builds the rest of the Palace of Westminster at the same scale....

Cheers

Rog

Edited by rriggs, 20 April 2012 - 12:15 PM.

"I bet Einstein turned himself all kinds of colours before he invented the lightbulb"

#24 gylman

gylman

  • Excellent......


    Posts: 1761
    Joined: 25-February 05
    Member: 252

Posted 20 April 2012 - 12:19 PM

Some thoughts:

1)  I think the value for money with this set may be the best in the entire series. Though I've shunned the smaller sets (Burj Dubai...UGH!) I will get this one.

2)  This is ideal for a work desk somewhere.

3)  The booklet does add value, and I've enjoyed them all. By the way, I find the SMELL of the booklets inside the architecture sets quite wonderful. In this age of eBooks and online reading, it's easy to forget that books are a multisensory experience that cannot be full fully duplicated by a Kindle or Kobo.

4)  There might be a way to rebuild the top of the tower so that the clock faces look a bit nicer. Obviously it would require some ninja building techniques given the scale here.


5)  This is a really great review.  Eurobricks should publish a book of their best reviews. It would be up there with the Brick Testament. Maybe we should call it The Eurobricks Testament

#25 Mr_Malfoy

Mr_Malfoy

    Posts: 535
    Joined: 03-April 11
    Member: 17027
    Country: Middle-Earth

Posted 20 April 2012 - 12:51 PM

Nice review, Pandora and Rufus :thumbup: !
I'm not an Architecture fan, but I might get this set, it's such a great model, and it'll be good have it on hand while watching the opening ceremonies of the Olympics this summer :sweet: !
I'm a Christian and proud of it! I'm also proud to be a Hunger Games, Harry Potter, Disney, Lord of the Rings, and LEGO fan too...



Reply to this topic



  



Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Review, Architecture, Reviewers Academy, 21013, Big Ben

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users