Jump to content

Comparison 7470 and 10213

  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Cavey


    Posts: 40
    Joined: 23-November 09
    Member: 8304

Posted 15 April 2012 - 05:56 PM

Posted Image
Hello all,

i managed to get my hands on a 7470 Space Shuttle Discovery-STS-31 and decided to share some pictures on this set as well as some comparison shots of the 10213 space shuttle set. Sorry if my photos are amateurish.

Should you require reference or the review on 10213, please check out dr_spock's review.


This is the front of the 7470 space shuttle. It has a more blocky but has a more solid look.
Posted Image

Side view of the 7470 space shuttle. Not so spectacular due to the holes...
Posted Image

Back view of the 7470 space shuttle
Posted Image

Bottom view of the 7470 space shuttle, The yellow technic parts are used to lower the front and back landing gears.
Posted Image

This is the shuttle's cockpit. while 1 minifig can fit inside, it wont be secure.
Posted Image

Shuttle's cargo area, Satellite and deploying arm of shuttle
Posted Image

Without the satellite. Sorry i can't take a photo with the satellite on the arm as i am missing some technic parts :( . Note the rubber bands used for the landing gears
Posted Image

The shuttle's tail is moveable (left and right)
Posted Image

Comparing 10213's Satellite and 7470's Satellite
Posted Image

10213 and 7470 front shot - Some how having a windscreen pieces looks much better than slopes
Posted Image

10213 and 7470 side shot
Posted Image

10213 and 7470 side shot 2
Posted Image

10213 and 7470 top view - Aligning them from the back engine, 7470 is longer
Posted Image

10213 and 7470 back view - the 7470 smaller engines are held with technic bricks so they are more sturdy.
Posted Image

Fun shot 10213, 7470 , 6544, 6339 shuttle.
Posted Image

Building the 7470 was fun however maybe slightly challenging if you are not a technic person, took about 2 hrs to finish building it. Comparing this with 10213, i think the 7470 shuttle has the look and feel of the real shuttle. If you like space shuttles and have the chance to grab hold of this shuttle for a decent price, do get it as well as it is well worth it. :)

Edited by Rufus, 25 April 2012 - 07:11 PM.

#2 Lyichir


    Posts: 2821
    Joined: 17-December 10
    Member: 14738
    Country: USA

Posted 15 April 2012 - 08:06 PM

I think the slopes work better than the windscreen, actually. The windscreen isn't nearly wide enough for a shuttle that size.

#3 prateek


  • Study hard!

    Posts: 10419
    Joined: 09-July 05
    Member: 426
    Country: Canada

Posted 15 April 2012 - 08:21 PM

View PostLyichir, on 15 April 2012 - 08:06 PM, said:

I think the slopes work better than the windscreen, actually. The windscreen isn't nearly wide enough for a shuttle that size.
Agreed. It's also worth noting that Cavey put the outer windshield slopes in place sloping towards the front, whereas in the instructions (and which looks better) the slopes are facing sideways.
Posted Image

#4 Vindicare


    Posts: 4783
    Joined: 12-August 10
    Member: 12542
    Country: USA(California)

Posted 16 April 2012 - 05:48 AM

Thanks for the comparison. You can definitely see the common areas of the two builds. Only minor changes being made.
Clone Army-147 & counting...

#5 dr_spock


  • BoBS IT Dept

    Posts: 9408
    Joined: 28-December 09
    Member: 8775
    Country: Canada

Posted 17 April 2012 - 06:15 AM

Thanks for the comparison.  It's interesting to see how things evolve over the years.

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users