Jump to content


Brickbeard's Bounty better than Queen Anne's Revenge?


31 replies to this topic  – Started by TheLegoChronicler , Jan 10 2012 10:12 PM

#1 TheLegoChronicler

TheLegoChronicler

    Posts: 13
    Joined: 02-October 11
    Member: 20761
    Country: USA

Posted 10 January 2012 - 10:12 PM

As I have perused the various discussion forums I have been shocked at the, by comparison, scathing reviews directed at the QAR as oppossed to the affection which is lavished on the Brickbeard's Bounty.  Is this true?  Is the BB truly regarded by this community as being a better ship than the QAR?  And if so why?

As one who owns and has built all 12 of the official Lego ships I regard the QAR as being one of the better ships and the BB as much more in the middle of the pack.  When compared to the QAR the BB is cartoony, has no front deck, has toothpicks holding up the sails, is smaller and contains far less detail.  The only thing I see that is better is that the rear cabin is enclosed but its other deficiences outweigh that one plus in my mind.  

So I am curious, do you like the BB better than the QAR and if so why?  Or have I gotten the wrong impression?
The Lego Chronicler
www.thelegochronicler.blogspot.com

#2 Captain Blackbeard

Captain Blackbeard

    Posts: 81
    Joined: 01-January 12
    Member: 23709
    Country: New Zealand

Posted 10 January 2012 - 10:14 PM

I prefer the QAR, especially now that I have given it a second deck. I don't really like the old ships. as their lack of realism puts me off, whereas the QAR looks like a real ship.
Battle not with monsters lest ye become a monster; and if you gaze into the abyss the abyss gazes into you

#3 charlieboy

charlieboy
  • chuffed to bits


    Posts: 802
    Joined: 25-August 09
    Member: 7180
    Country: Ye Olde England

Posted 10 January 2012 - 10:29 PM

View PostCaptain Blackbeard, on 10 January 2012 - 10:14 PM, said:

I prefer the QAR, especially now that I have given it a second deck.

Do you have any pics of that? I built mine last night and I have to say I love it! The ship itself is fantastic but could do with a few improvements but thats just my personal taste.

As for BB, it's a set I dont own but was seriously considering buying. I love the shape, I love the closed cabin and I love the minifigs much more than the ones that came with the QAR. The only reason I now probably wont buy it is because i've recrewed my QAR with lots of classic pirates figs and will be modding the ship to suit my personal tastes and having two pirate ships and no imperial vessals seems silly!

Edited by charlieboy, 10 January 2012 - 10:31 PM.


#4 Captain Blackbeard

Captain Blackbeard

    Posts: 81
    Joined: 01-January 12
    Member: 23709
    Country: New Zealand

Posted 10 January 2012 - 10:47 PM

@Charlie
My camera isn't working, but the upgrades are simple; The grey 2 by 4 plates above the cannon portholes (they'll only have four studs poking out), you can put platforms spanning the gap between port and starboard, but the bone railings will have to have black bricks put underneath them, so that they're at normal railing height (not the old height, which is really high, just 1 brick underneath each slant piece with bones), but leave an area around the main mast so it's not obstructed.
note; There will not be enough headroom in the gun deck for a minifig to stand
Also, when you've completed adding the deck, you can put cannons poking out between the gaps in the bone railing
Battle not with monsters lest ye become a monster; and if you gaze into the abyss the abyss gazes into you

#5 TheLegoChronicler

TheLegoChronicler

    Posts: 13
    Joined: 02-October 11
    Member: 20761
    Country: USA

Posted 10 January 2012 - 10:47 PM

View PostCaptain Blackbeard, on 10 January 2012 - 10:14 PM, said:

I prefer the QAR, especially now that I have given it a second deck. I don't really like the old ships. as their lack of realism puts me off, whereas the QAR looks like a real ship.

Yeah I must confess that my affinity for the QAR is partially due to the modifications I did to it.  I added a hold beneath the front deck, enclosed the captain's cabin and added a galley beneath the back in a manner similar to the Imperial Flagship.  

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Edited by TheLegoChronicler, 10 January 2012 - 10:48 PM.

The Lego Chronicler
www.thelegochronicler.blogspot.com

#6 Hive

Hive
  • Friendsified!


    Posts: 913
    Joined: 19-March 10
    Member: 9979
    Country: Denmark

Posted 10 January 2012 - 11:10 PM

I don't own any of the ships (but plan on buying both POTC ships later this year), but judging from pictures of all the ships (which I have studied extensively) I'd definately say the QAR is the prettier ship. The colours are better, the sails are heaps better and the size is more impressive. BB does have a much better rear, though the cannon there kinda ruins it. I also like the BB figs more, but that's purely due to them being yellow instead of fleshie. I must admit that I'm impressed by the QAR minifig torsos (and the cool tan hat).

#7 Yawgmoth

Yawgmoth
  • Glory to the Bluecoats!


    Posts: 240
    Joined: 08-April 10
    Member: 10202
    Country: Costa Rica

Posted 10 January 2012 - 11:29 PM

QAR is by far a better ship IMHO.. beatiful sails, not cartonish and childish ones.. lots of details, a lot bigger, and mean looking, better crew, better colour scheme, overall, if I could give a grade based on 1 to 10 for each one, I'd grade the BB bounty with a 5, and the QAR with a 8.5 - 9.. even the name of  it's captain, brickbeard, is something that I don't like either :P
Redesigning classics, with my own flavor :)

Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image

#8 Napoleon53

Napoleon53

    Posts: 138
    Joined: 01-January 12
    Member: 23727
    Country: Zanzitania

Posted 11 January 2012 - 12:07 AM

QAR! I have both, and I would not buy a second BBB, but I am buying a second QAR. 1000+ parts in the QAR versus the 500+ in the BBB speaks for itself. Plus, if you order QAR on Amazon like I did, it's only 99 bucks, which is a steal. And of course, the skull sails on the BBB are, IMO, absolutely horrendous.

Edited by Napoleon53, 11 January 2012 - 12:08 AM.

"Imagination rules the world." - Emperor Napoleon I
Posted Image
PS3 ID: Jamako53

#9 Captain Blackbeard

Captain Blackbeard

    Posts: 81
    Joined: 01-January 12
    Member: 23709
    Country: New Zealand

Posted 11 January 2012 - 12:18 AM

Oh. to buy another QAR. Curse you, dream of a Border Collie, for making me devote my life to a dog!  :pir_laugh2:
The design on the QAR sails is amazing, also. Crossed swords under a crown, what could be better?

Edited by Captain Blackbeard, 11 January 2012 - 12:20 AM.

Battle not with monsters lest ye become a monster; and if you gaze into the abyss the abyss gazes into you

#10 Napoleon53

Napoleon53

    Posts: 138
    Joined: 01-January 12
    Member: 23727
    Country: Zanzitania

Posted 11 January 2012 - 12:40 AM

View PostCaptain Blackbeard, on 11 January 2012 - 12:18 AM, said:


The design on the QAR sails is amazing, also. Crossed swords under a crown, what could be better?

And the QAR sails don't have a honking ugly copyright thumbing your eye. :pir-tongue: If you look extremely closely, there is a copyright, but I had the set for a few days before I even noticed.
"Imagination rules the world." - Emperor Napoleon I
Posted Image
PS3 ID: Jamako53

#11 Yawgmoth

Yawgmoth
  • Glory to the Bluecoats!


    Posts: 240
    Joined: 08-April 10
    Member: 10202
    Country: Costa Rica

Posted 11 January 2012 - 01:46 AM

View PostNapoleon53, on 11 January 2012 - 12:40 AM, said:

And the QAR sails don't have a honking ugly copyright thumbing your eye. :pir-tongue: If you look extremely closely, there is a copyright, but I had the set for a few days before I even noticed.

Gotta admit I haven't noticed it, 'til you mentioned about it hehe
Redesigning classics, with my own flavor :)

Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image

#12 Sebeus I

Sebeus I
  • Winner of the Third Tournament of Retribution!


    Posts: 1430
    Joined: 04-September 08
    Member: 3891
    Country: Belgium

Posted 11 January 2012 - 06:47 AM

View PostTheLegoChronicler, on 10 January 2012 - 10:12 PM, said:

...
Is the BB truly regarded by this community as being a better ship than the QAR?  And if so why?

You will see that this community has very different opinions about it as well, I'll show you,


View PostCaptain Blackbeard, on 10 January 2012 - 10:14 PM, said:

I prefer the QAR, especially now that I have given it a second deck. I don't really like the old ships. as their lack of realism puts me off, whereas the QAR looks like a real ship.
I don't really like the new ships as their lack of realism puts me off, the black seas barracuda, that one looks like a real ship.

:pir_laugh2:

So you see, my opinion is the complete opposite of Captain Blackbeard's and yet I call on the same argument that he calls on to justify his choice,
the only sensible thing I can say about this is that there is no better ship, the ships are not so different, it are the people who make the difference.

Now as for my presonal opinion about the QAR versus the BB,
I prefer the QAR as well, the sail plan is superior to the one of the BB and the sails itself are a lot nicer as well (and on that point I'm on the same side as Captain Blackbeard  :pir_laugh2: )

Edited by Sebeus Iniwum, 11 January 2012 - 06:49 AM.


#13 Captain Blackbeard

Captain Blackbeard

    Posts: 81
    Joined: 01-January 12
    Member: 23709
    Country: New Zealand

Posted 13 January 2012 - 02:22 AM

No need to turn this into a clash, Sebeus. Your opinion doesn't concern me. Neither ship has a second deck, yet both has guns (not so many on the BB) so neither is realistic. Except, the QAR was easier to modify.
Battle not with monsters lest ye become a monster; and if you gaze into the abyss the abyss gazes into you

#14 Captain Becker

Captain Becker
  • Pirate Pig


    Posts: 1545
    Joined: 30-December 09
    Member: 8823
    Country: Finland

Posted 13 January 2012 - 11:09 AM

QAR for me, it looks much nicer, have more sails and is easy to MOD. :pir-classic:  The only bd thing about QAR is the cabin, its too small.

Captain Becker
My LEGO collection

"An Admiral a day, keeps the Doctor away" General Skalldyr in ToR II

Posted Image Posted Image <---- Thank you so much joey Bluecoats FTW
Thank you Jebediahs

#15 Captain Roger

Captain Roger
  • Salty EB dog


    Posts: 568
    Joined: 14-June 05
    Member: 376
    Country: the sea

Posted 13 January 2012 - 05:09 PM

-BB's cannos have movement mechanism. QAR's cannons not. One point to BB
-BB's has a really cool poop deck. QAR's stern is a bit empty. One point to BB
-QAR's sails are much better than BB's(BB's sails are terrible). One point to QAR

So, for me:

BB: 2
QAR: 1

I prefer BB, then. By the way, I think QAR has 12 pockets, so it could have 6 or 12 cannons...but it has only 3...too bad.
LET'S CRAH THE IMPERIAL GUARDS!!!

#16 Sebeus I

Sebeus I
  • Winner of the Third Tournament of Retribution!


    Posts: 1430
    Joined: 04-September 08
    Member: 3891
    Country: Belgium

Posted 13 January 2012 - 05:43 PM

View PostCaptain Roger, on 13 January 2012 - 05:09 PM, said:

-BB's cannos have movement mechanism. QAR's cannons not. One point to BB
...
Good point, I didn't take that into consideration but still, QAR beats the BB, the QAR has a smaller ppo deck but that's also more realistic for such a tall cabin.


View PostCaptain Blackbeard, on 13 January 2012 - 02:22 AM, said:

No need to turn this into a clash, Sebeus. Your opinion doesn't concern me. Neither ship has a second deck, yet both has guns (not so many on the BB) so neither is realistic. Except, the QAR was easier to modify.
No clash at all  :pir_laugh2:

Now,

View PostTheLegoChronicler, on 10 January 2012 - 10:12 PM, said:

As I have perused the various discussion forums I have been shocked at the, by comparison, scathing reviews directed at the QAR as oppossed to the affection which is lavished on the Brickbeard's Bounty.  Is this true?  Is the BB truly regarded by this community as being a better ship than the QAR?  And if so why?


I could be wrong but perhaps you confuse the Black Seas Barracuda with the Brickbeard bounty (BSB  -  BB)
both ships have the same colors of sails so it's very possible,
Personally I would spot the difference instantly, the BSB is superior to the BB in every aspect (IMO).
Anyway, I think a lot of members here prefer the black seas barracuda over most other ships.

#17 Hive

Hive
  • Friendsified!


    Posts: 913
    Joined: 19-March 10
    Member: 9979
    Country: Denmark

Posted 13 January 2012 - 06:30 PM

View PostSebeus Iniwum, on 13 January 2012 - 05:43 PM, said:

Anyway, I think a lot of members here prefer the black seas barracuda over most other ships.

Design-wise, I think only the newest Imperial Flagship is better than the BSB - though I think several ships generally have a better color scheme, as I'm not too fond of the yellow and, especially, old grey in it. I prefer the colors of both the BB and the QAR to the BSB by far.

#18 Captain Roger

Captain Roger
  • Salty EB dog


    Posts: 568
    Joined: 14-June 05
    Member: 376
    Country: the sea

Posted 14 January 2012 - 09:46 PM

View PostSebeus Iniwum, on 13 January 2012 - 05:43 PM, said:

Good point, I didn't take that into consideration but still, QAR beats the BB, the QAR has a smaller ppo deck but that's also more realistic for such a tall cabin.

If we talk about realism, QAR has lots of skeleton ornaments...this is not realistic. By the way I don't understand why that smaller poop deck is more realistic for such a tall cabin
LET'S CRAH THE IMPERIAL GUARDS!!!

#19 Captain Blackbeard

Captain Blackbeard

    Posts: 81
    Joined: 01-January 12
    Member: 23709
    Country: New Zealand

Posted 14 January 2012 - 09:48 PM

Actually, it is realistic. What kinda pirate captain would leave his ship unadorned? Blackbeard simply added the bones of those he slain onto the ship. No harm done (figuratively)
Besides, it looks good!
Battle not with monsters lest ye become a monster; and if you gaze into the abyss the abyss gazes into you

#20 Sebeus I

Sebeus I
  • Winner of the Third Tournament of Retribution!


    Posts: 1430
    Joined: 04-September 08
    Member: 3891
    Country: Belgium

Posted 14 January 2012 - 10:28 PM

View PostCaptain Roger, on 14 January 2012 - 09:46 PM, said:

If we talk about realism, QAR has lots of skeleton ornaments...this is not realistic. By the way I don't understand why that smaller poop deck is more realistic for such a tall cabin
Stability, the typical tumblehome of such ships,
the higher a deck is located, the thinner it is, check out other galleons and see for yourself.
Now ofcourse the official lego ships generally don't care much about the tumblehome, the prefab hulls are already a hystorically unaccuracy when used for a waterline model so I suppose it's not usefull to take this quality into considerations when discussing official LEGO ships  :pir-hmpf_bad:

#21 Captain Blackbeard

Captain Blackbeard

    Posts: 81
    Joined: 01-January 12
    Member: 23709
    Country: New Zealand

Posted 15 January 2012 - 12:54 AM

The bottom of the hull approximates the waterline, but those new-ish City ships, with the buoyant hull, are really neat! I'm getting the police boat so I can use its hull to build a yacht, I've already made the sail. Unfortunately, I made a simple big triangular sail, not the rectangular-ish sail that most large yachts have, but oh well. I don't have much fabric left.
Battle not with monsters lest ye become a monster; and if you gaze into the abyss the abyss gazes into you

#22 Piranha

Piranha
  • Tag! You're it


    Posts: 4372
    Joined: 07-April 07
    Member: 1506
    Country: USA

Posted 15 January 2012 - 01:30 AM

Yeah I like BB better myself. It is classic LEGO Pirates (2) and has better figs a nicer color scheme and is not lacking in much. :shark:

Got Questions? Need help? New member?
Read the site guidelines | Index of helpful tutorials | Eurobricks FAQ

Posted Image
  


#23 Yawgmoth

Yawgmoth
  • Glory to the Bluecoats!


    Posts: 240
    Joined: 08-April 10
    Member: 10202
    Country: Costa Rica

Posted 15 January 2012 - 08:08 AM

View PostCaptain Blackbeard, on 14 January 2012 - 09:48 PM, said:

Actually, it is realistic. What kinda pirate captain would leave his ship unadorned? Blackbeard simply added the bones of those he slain onto the ship. No harm done (figuratively)
Besides, it looks good!

QAR.. according to the movie, or to some official images on the internet, hast indeed lots of skeletal ornaments, or hanged skeletons.., but not in the places 4195 lego QAR has..it doesn't bothers me much, but it could certainly be better placed.. fortunately, it brings enough material for us to make the neccesary mods :P

Edited by Yawgmoth, 15 January 2012 - 08:11 AM.

Redesigning classics, with my own flavor :)

Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image

#24 Dreamweb

Dreamweb
  • Thanks for your contributions!


    Posts: 1567
    Joined: 28-June 05
    Member: 396
    Country: Poland

Posted 15 January 2012 - 09:41 PM

I prefer the Brickbeard's Bounty myself. It has more features to play with, such as the accessible cabin and so on. However QAR has much better sails. But overall BB is still better.

#25 Jack Bricker

Jack Bricker

    Posts: 621
    Joined: 01-November 09
    Member: 8047

Posted 16 January 2012 - 03:10 AM

I have to say that I prefer the QAR.  Both ships feel a bit empty but, the QAR is a lot easier to modify, probably why Lego put those grey shelves on the QAR to begin with, and the QAR has much better sails.  The cabin inside BB is more spacious but is also more empty whereas when you put a door on the QAR cabin and put in a chair it looks a lot better and although is difficult to play with I think it still works.  As far as the cannons are concerned none of Lego's large pirate or imperial ships come with all of their cannons and QAR does have the capacity for double the amount of cannons than the BB.  The only thing I like better about the BB is the mermaid figurehead and then again I really like the flaming skeleton on the QAR. :pir-classic:



Reply to this topic



  


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Sponsored Links