Jump to content


2012 LEGO Architecture News & Discussion


  • Please log in to reply
141 replies to this topic

#26 Aanchir

Aanchir

  • Color Encyclopedia


    Posts: 9170
    Joined: 31-December 09
    Member: 8841
    Country: United States

Posted 13 January 2012 - 03:55 PM

Some parts of the model seem really stylishly replicated, others not so much. The sails themselves look excellent for this size, but the places where they meet are a bit gappy-looking. There is definitely a lot to be said for the techniques that were presumably used to get the different sections of the building at the correct angles from one another-- having such a large portion of the model not parallel to the edges of the base is unusual for any LEGO set, even a LEGO Architecture set. I'm curious if this relies on the Pythagorean method of angling bricks or on some type of hinge plate like the 2x2 turntable.

While I agree a larger-scale model could have been much more precise, one thing I kind of like about some Architecture sets (like the Space Needle, which I consider the best set from the first wave) is how they go for the overall impression of their subjects rather than necessarily for more exact, sculpture-like renditions. The same can sort of be seen in the four "horsemen" atop the Brandenburg Gate. In general for the Architecture line this is a very nice set, and I'm sure if TLG ever wanted to go back and make a larger model like the Taj Mahal set, there'd be nothing stopping them.

#27 ZO6

ZO6

  • EB Adventurers Reviewer and now a Teacher


    Posts: 778
    Joined: 16-April 07
    Member: 1532
    Country: Canada

Posted 13 January 2012 - 04:21 PM

I thought a couple years ago there was a short article/teaser saying that TLC was working on the Sydney Opera House and that it'd set a new highest piece count (greater than the Taj Mahal)?  I can't recall where that was posted (somewhere here on EB).  Anyways, I too am disappointed that this set not only didn't turn out to be another Sculpture but that this Architecture version seems incapable of doing the building justice. Oh well, can't win 'em all.

#28 JopieK

JopieK

  • Kneecap Buster


    Posts: 2703
    Joined: 04-January 07
    Member: 1180
    Country: Netherlands

Posted 13 January 2012 - 05:00 PM

View Postthe-bricking-builder, on 15 December 2011 - 04:39 PM, said:

Hello.
when I was looking at brickshop.nl,In the new items bar was this added:
LEGO 21012 Sydney Opera House.
The release date is 1 june 2012,and the price 39,99 euro's.
this was the same site that give us information about the pet shop,and the joust,so I think we can trust  this.
What do you think?

there are ligid then, a lot of european lugs don't like the fact that LEGO supplied brickshop.nl with the Maersk train set before they gave it to LUGs like de Bouwsteen, BeLUG or Lowlug. brickshop.nl came out with a youtube video about it. It seems they have good connections with LEGO :)

New Member? Read This | Questions? Need Help?Ask Here
Site Guidelines | Eurobricks FAQ | Visual User Guide


Posted Image

-== Classic LEGO trains are the best ==-

Do you need replacement stickers for LEGO (reproductions and customs): ministickers.nl

What then about the LEGuanO?!


#29 Athos

Athos

  • Sloppiness Seeker


    Posts: 3893
    Joined: 31-October 04
    Member: 84
    Country: USA

Posted 13 January 2012 - 06:15 PM

Wow, it looks terrible. It looks more like a super sarlaac than the opera house.

Steve

#30 Cult of Shezmu

Cult of Shezmu

    Posts: 19
    Joined: 31-December 11
    Member: 23682
    Country: Wales

Posted 13 January 2012 - 06:25 PM

Nice! I'm looking forward to seeing this on release... has it been confirmed that it'll be roughly 40 EUR to buy?

#31 Meatman

Meatman

    Posts: 1600
    Joined: 04-November 08
    Member: 4287

Posted 13 January 2012 - 06:36 PM

Meh. I'll pass on this one. I would much rather see a large scale model.

Edited by Meatman, 13 January 2012 - 06:36 PM.


#32 Costy

Costy

    Posts: 551
    Joined: 13-January 12
    Member: 24102
    Country: Australia

Posted 13 January 2012 - 08:41 PM

As an Aussie, I think this one looks alright, but I agree that the size is too small to do it well.

Nagure the Yeti Berserker


#33 Clone gunner comander jedi

Clone gunner comander jedi

    Posts: 107
    Joined: 17-December 11
    Member: 23248
    Country: United Kingdom

Posted 13 January 2012 - 09:05 PM

Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image

#34 frogstudio

frogstudio

    Posts: 415
    Joined: 06-February 08
    Member: 2684
    Country: Argentina

Posted 13 January 2012 - 09:40 PM

First time I say this of a LEGO set:  This is horrible!!!!

#35 ibecks

ibecks

    Posts: 100
    Joined: 01-May 11
    Member: 17583

Posted 13 January 2012 - 09:48 PM

This is pretty disappointing.  I don't collect this series, but when I saw the name of the set I expected a much better representation of it than this.  Not sure how you could do the sails better... maybe there should be a Eurobricks competition to design a better one!  :wink:

#36 lightningtiger

lightningtiger

  • Gungans taste like chicken


    Posts: 21406
    Joined: 28-October 09
    Member: 7997
    Country: Australia

Posted 13 January 2012 - 09:48 PM

Is this what we have been waiting for.....it's a MEH ! :facepalm:
The sail shapes are not even close, at least the others in the series look similar to what they are meant to be.
So, this.....Posted Image.....has became that. :innocent:
Each sail piece ends at a point not a squared off line.....it looks like it from a distance....get closer and it's a fail.
Sorry, Lego but from this Aussie who has walked around it for real....you fail. :blush:

#37 TheLegoDr

TheLegoDr

  • Yellow Panel Expert


    Posts: 5013
    Joined: 18-July 11
    Member: 19128
    Country: USA

Posted 13 January 2012 - 10:28 PM

I am not from Australia. I have never visited this iconic building. When I first saw the pictures I thought it looked terrible. Nowhere near how it should look. After looking at the picture LT put up, I actually can visualize what Lego was doing. I actually kind of like it now. I still won't buy it, but it isn't as bad as I was thinking it was originally.
Posted Image   Posted Image  Posted Image   Posted Image   Posted Image  Posted Image

flickr

#38 Brickmamba

Brickmamba

    Posts: 1320
    Joined: 08-April 11
    Member: 17142
    Country: OZ

Posted 13 January 2012 - 10:38 PM

Wow how bad is that, the midi scale seems to be a lazy outlet for Lego when it comes to giving an answer for each set in this series, as bad as some buildings have been in the past this takes the cake  :thumbdown:
My Flickr
My Instagram @kjavis

#39 Spencer_R

Spencer_R

    Posts: 73
    Joined: 27-June 10
    Member: 11691
    Country: USA

Posted 13 January 2012 - 11:21 PM

Are those 1x2 trans-black plates?!  :drool:
Spencer R.

Flickr Mocpages

#40 Darth of Soals

Darth of Soals

    Posts: 23
    Joined: 13-January 12
    Member: 24143

Posted 13 January 2012 - 11:42 PM

Iv never much been interested in the Architecture sets
  And to be honest, this dosen't really do much for me but
  i do like how this particular set it made,
  hinged slopes if im not mistaken... :thumbup:

#41 Delta 38

Delta 38

    Posts: 1352
    Joined: 03-January 10
    Member: 8890
    Country: Australia.

Posted 14 January 2012 - 01:21 AM

Wow. I don't collect Architecture sets (not available in stores), but this definitely looks like one of the worse models of the lot.
I would have expected something bigger, considering it's a fairly iconic landmark.

Also because I live ten minutes away from it.  :tongue:
Hi.

#42 Esurient

Esurient

  • aka Romeo


    Posts: 1046
    Joined: 06-May 11
    Member: 17675

Posted 14 January 2012 - 01:45 AM

The sail structures need to be connected and their tips need to be sharp and pointy. This set isn't a close representation of the real structure. And seriously the set has too many holes. Not even close. Worse architecture set so far.
Now appearing as Elin Surefoot 397 years old Dwarven Cleric in Sandy's Cruel Angel's Thesis

#43 Shawn

Shawn

    Posts: 236
    Joined: 18-March 10
    Member: 9964

Posted 14 January 2012 - 02:44 AM

I agree that is looks like crap. I wonder how many pieces it would have taken to make it look like this?

AWESOME
Shawn
http://www.minifigpriceguide.com
See the top 100 rare and expensive minifigures
http://www.minifigpr...inifigures.html

#44 chuckie8646

chuckie8646

    Posts: 186
    Joined: 12-May 11
    Member: 17813
    Country: UK

Posted 14 January 2012 - 03:15 AM

Ahhhhhhhhh.... Hmmm well Im disappointed. i have been wanting a sydney opera house really bad but if the option is no opera house or this one i chose no opera house.
I get the feeling that this set was rushed. I just hope this is just false photo.
Man what a shame  :cry_sad:
Charlie

#45 Ceroknight

Ceroknight

  • Straight Up Cero!


    Posts: 3192
    Joined: 30-August 10
    Member: 12949
    Country: Canada

Posted 14 January 2012 - 05:02 AM

Disappointing, very disappointing :sceptic:
Ceroknight
Posted Image Posted Image
Photo by Librarian-bot:His Fantastic Deviantart page
Brickset  Flickr

#46 Rune Haako

Rune Haako

    Posts: 130
    Joined: 31-October 07
    Member: 2143
    Country: United States

Posted 14 January 2012 - 05:12 AM

That looks awful. I'm glad I don't buy these, or I'd be upset.

#47 Elaine_C

Elaine_C

    Posts: 19
    Joined: 14-January 12
    Member: 24164
    Country: New Zealand

Posted 14 January 2012 - 07:19 AM

View Postmo123567, on 16 December 2011 - 03:26 AM, said:

I'm not Australian but I agree with you. The Sydney Opera house would have made a wonderful Taj Mahal sized set. I'm not a big fan of the architecture line.

Same here. I got fairly excited reading rumours this would possibly be released as a Large Scale Model, so a bit disappointed.
Great for Architecture line though, I think it's awesome that also non-US buildings have been designed for this lately. :thumbup:

#48 Esurient

Esurient

  • aka Romeo


    Posts: 1046
    Joined: 06-May 11
    Member: 17675

Posted 14 January 2012 - 10:15 AM

View PostShawn, on 14 January 2012 - 02:44 AM, said:

I agree that is looks like crap. I wonder how many pieces it would have taken to make it look like this?

AWESOME

TLG should have made something like this. That is really life-like. A 5922 piece Taj Mahal would mean TLG is capable of a 5000 piece Sydney Opera House.
Now appearing as Elin Surefoot 397 years old Dwarven Cleric in Sandy's Cruel Angel's Thesis

#49 brickie

brickie

    Posts: 227
    Joined: 18-September 11
    Member: 20503
    Country: Australia

Posted 14 January 2012 - 12:42 PM

If the photos are to be believed, it looks like the 15 year old work experience student at Lego knocked this monstrosity up in their lunch break.

#50 Aanchir

Aanchir

  • Color Encyclopedia


    Posts: 9170
    Joined: 31-December 09
    Member: 8841
    Country: United States

Posted 14 January 2012 - 02:26 PM

View Postbrickie, on 14 January 2012 - 12:42 PM, said:

If the photos are to be believed, it looks like the 15 year old work experience student at Lego knocked this monstrosity up in their lunch break.
I don't like comments like this; they seem to ignore the effort and experience that goes into even sloppy-looking designs. If you look at the angle of the main building from the rectangular base, that doesn't strike me as the work of an amateur, but rather the work of a professional. If the sails show less professionalism that could just mean that the designer had different priorities than getting the sails exactly right. But IMO even the sails are a lot more sophisticated in design than anything I could have thrown together at this scale, echoing their familiar flaring shape in a way that couldn't be mistaken for any other building.

I'm curious what the price point for this set will be. Amazon.co.jp prices it a bit higher than the Brandenburg Gate, and I think that seems reasonable, since it seems similar in size but with a much more complicated base.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users