Jump to content


Building 6289 Red Beard Runner vs 6243 Brickbeard's Bounty


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic  – Started by Israel_B , Jul 11 2011 04:36 PM

#1 Israel_B

Israel_B

    Posts: 17
    Joined: 06-July 11
    Member: 18897

Posted 11 July 2011 - 04:36 PM

I'm fortunate that I just got both these ships used from a kind bricklink seller. I built the (re-issue) Brickbeard's Bounty first and  was nothing but impressed at the set and instructions. Everyone agrees it is an amazing ship. That done I built the 6289 Red Beard Runner next. This set didnt come with original instructions but I was able to get them off the lego.com support site. The build seemed over complicated, the instructions unclear and just wrong in some places. Is this a difference of how instructions are done these days vs back then or are my impressions of the RBR completely off base?

Pardon me if I'm crossing well trod ground. I'm new here and have tried to look through the posting archives but if this was covered and I missed it, my apologies.

#2 Captain Becker

Captain Becker
  • Once a red coat, not always a red coat.


    Posts: 1644
    Joined: 30-December 09
    Member: 8823
    Country: Finland

Posted 11 July 2011 - 09:56 PM

I myself dont find earlier instruction books that hard, but it is clear at instruction books are now more clearer and makes the build easier, it shows the pieces wich you need, and the amount of them ETc. In early days, there wasnt such things. So yeah, quality of instruction booklets is increased i would say.

Captain Becker
Posted Image Posted Image <---- Thank you so much joey!
Thank you Jebediahs

Currently playing as: Captain Charles J. Becker, Oleon in BOBS
Posted Image

#3 yys4u

yys4u

    Posts: 215
    Joined: 25-September 10
    Member: 13441
    Country: United States

Posted 11 July 2011 - 11:02 PM

The older instructions are a little harder to read in my opinion, but I like the older ones rather than the new ones. The new ones you'll find a whole page dedicated to 2-3 pieces, older instructions added MANY more bricks per step and its hard to catch them. So as an adult, I like the older instructions cause it's more of a challenge, now a days, even with sets labelled 16+ I'm pretty sure a 12 year old could follow them.

That being said, I think Brickbeard's bounty is much better designed than Red Beard Runner and thus may be easier to follow.

#4 Sebeus I

Sebeus I
  • Winner of the Third Tournament of Retribution!


    Posts: 1571
    Joined: 04-September 08
    Member: 3891
    Country: Belgium

Posted 12 July 2011 - 08:30 AM

The red beard runner is to my opinion a more interesting ship, partially because of its complexity, I love its cabin.
As said already the more recent instructions are much easier though personally I'm often having difficulties with finding the right color, black and dark gray are almost the same.
Anyway, Brickbeard's Bounty may be easier to build but the RBR is much more interesting, it just takes a little bit more of an effort.
Posted Image

#5 Edmond Dantes

Edmond Dantes

    Posts: 328
    Joined: 01-June 09
    Member: 6261
    Country: United States

Posted 12 July 2011 - 09:38 PM

View PostIsrael_B, on 11 July 2011 - 04:36 PM, said:

I'm fortunate that I just got both these ships used from a kind bricklink seller. I built the (re-issue) Brickbeard's Bounty first and  was nothing but impressed at the set and instructions. Everyone agrees it is an amazing ship. That done I built the 6289 Red Beard Runner next. This set didnt come with original instructions but I was able to get them off the lego.com support site. The build seemed over complicated, the instructions unclear and just wrong in some places. Is this a difference of how instructions are done these days vs back then or are my impressions of the RBR completely off base?

Pardon me if I'm crossing well trod ground. I'm new here and have tried to look through the posting archives but if this was covered and I missed it, my apologies.


A re-issued Brickbeard's Bounty?  Are you sure you don't mean Black Seas Barracuda?

#6 Israel_B

Israel_B

    Posts: 17
    Joined: 06-July 11
    Member: 18897

Posted 13 July 2011 - 01:04 AM

View PostEdmond Dantes, on 12 July 2011 - 09:38 PM, said:

A re-issued Brickbeard's Bounty?  Are you sure you don't mean Black Seas Barracuda?

It is definitely 6243 Brickbeard's Bounty. I could of course be mistaken on the re-issue point.

#7 Zeya

Zeya
  • Thinks He's a Stud


    Posts: 1038
    Joined: 28-September 10
    Member: 13511
    Country: United States

Posted 13 July 2011 - 01:56 AM

View PostIsrael_B, on 13 July 2011 - 01:04 AM, said:

It is definitely 6243 Brickbeard's Bounty. I could of course be mistaken on the re-issue point.

When I came out of my dark age, I thought for sure that Brickbeard's Bounty was the exact same as a ship I had as a kid and Lego was still producing older sets. I was totally wrong. In fact, going back and seeing just the differences in minfigure printing was staggering! Things seemed so much more exciting and vivid in my mind's eye.

But yeah Brickbeard's Bounty is not a re-issue; it's from the 2009 Pirates line (on store shelves until the past 6-8 months or so). The re-issues you're probably thinking of are from the "Legends" line that they had for a short time. They re-did a couple of the pirate ships and one of the castles. The "Legends" had notable differences and they weren't 100% true to the originals, it seems. I think the Legends sets were some time around 2000-2004. I'm too lazy to dig up links on brickset or bricklink.  :pir-hmpf_bad:




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Sponsored Links